利用分子技术了解越南达克湖省特定种类钩虫流行率和感染强度并检测类圆线虫。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Wenyu Liu, Adam W Bartlett, Katrina Blazek, Sze Fui Hii, Clare E F Dyer, Vito Colella, Rebecca J Traub, Dinh Ng-Nguyen, Susana Vaz Nery
{"title":"利用分子技术了解越南达克湖省特定种类钩虫流行率和感染强度并检测类圆线虫。","authors":"Wenyu Liu, Adam W Bartlett, Katrina Blazek, Sze Fui Hii, Clare E F Dyer, Vito Colella, Rebecca J Traub, Dinh Ng-Nguyen, Susana Vaz Nery","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.24-0670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is an increasingly recognized diagnostic tool for soil-transmitted helminths (STHs), overcoming limitations of microscopy. We compared qPCR with Kato-Katz (KK) and sodium nitrate flotation (SNF; specific gravities 1.2 and 1.3) in determining STH prevalence and infection intensity using samples from a community survey of 351 people in Dak Lak province, Vietnam. Established correlation formulas were used to convert qPCR cycle threshold values to eggs per gram to compare infection intensity. Sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between methods were also investigated. Hookworm was the predominant STH detected, with prevalences of 70.3% (95% CI: 63.6-76.9) by qPCR, 59.1% (95% CI: 46.3-72.4) by 1.2SNF, 56.5% (95% CI: 43.2-69.4) by 1.3SNF, and 47.8% (95% CI: 34.6-57.6) by KK. Detection of Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura was low across methods. Prevalences of zoonotic hookworm Ancylostoma ceylanicum and Strongyloides species by qPCR were 3.0% (95% CI: 1.3-6.4) and 17.3% (95% CI: 8.1-22.3), respectively. qPCR detected higher prevalence of moderate- (8.3% versus <2%) and heavy-intensity (9.4% versus 0%) infections than microscopy. The sensitivities of microscopy methods were 81.0% (1.2SNF), 75.8% (1.3SNF), and 67.4% (KK). Diagnostic agreement for hookworm was moderate between qPCR and KK and between qPCR and 1.3SNF, and it was good between qPCR and 1.2SNF. The superior performance of qPCR in detecting hookworm coupled with the capacity to differentiate hookworm species and detect Strongyloides spp. supports the role of qPCR to inform control strategies, particularly for zoonotic reservoirs and use of macrocyclic lactones.</p>","PeriodicalId":7752,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harnessing Molecular Techniques to Inform Species-Specific Hookworm Prevalence and Infection Intensity and Detect Strongyloides in Dak Lak Province, Vietnam.\",\"authors\":\"Wenyu Liu, Adam W Bartlett, Katrina Blazek, Sze Fui Hii, Clare E F Dyer, Vito Colella, Rebecca J Traub, Dinh Ng-Nguyen, Susana Vaz Nery\",\"doi\":\"10.4269/ajtmh.24-0670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is an increasingly recognized diagnostic tool for soil-transmitted helminths (STHs), overcoming limitations of microscopy. We compared qPCR with Kato-Katz (KK) and sodium nitrate flotation (SNF; specific gravities 1.2 and 1.3) in determining STH prevalence and infection intensity using samples from a community survey of 351 people in Dak Lak province, Vietnam. Established correlation formulas were used to convert qPCR cycle threshold values to eggs per gram to compare infection intensity. Sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between methods were also investigated. Hookworm was the predominant STH detected, with prevalences of 70.3% (95% CI: 63.6-76.9) by qPCR, 59.1% (95% CI: 46.3-72.4) by 1.2SNF, 56.5% (95% CI: 43.2-69.4) by 1.3SNF, and 47.8% (95% CI: 34.6-57.6) by KK. Detection of Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura was low across methods. Prevalences of zoonotic hookworm Ancylostoma ceylanicum and Strongyloides species by qPCR were 3.0% (95% CI: 1.3-6.4) and 17.3% (95% CI: 8.1-22.3), respectively. qPCR detected higher prevalence of moderate- (8.3% versus <2%) and heavy-intensity (9.4% versus 0%) infections than microscopy. The sensitivities of microscopy methods were 81.0% (1.2SNF), 75.8% (1.3SNF), and 67.4% (KK). Diagnostic agreement for hookworm was moderate between qPCR and KK and between qPCR and 1.3SNF, and it was good between qPCR and 1.2SNF. The superior performance of qPCR in detecting hookworm coupled with the capacity to differentiate hookworm species and detect Strongyloides spp. supports the role of qPCR to inform control strategies, particularly for zoonotic reservoirs and use of macrocyclic lactones.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0670\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)是一种越来越被认可的土壤传播蠕虫(STHs)诊断工具,克服了显微镜的局限性。我们比较了qPCR与Kato-Katz (KK)和硝酸钠浮选(SNF);比重1.2和1.3),利用越南达克省351人的社区调查样本,确定STH流行率和感染强度。利用建立的相关公式将qPCR周期阈值转换为每克卵数,比较感染强度。敏感性、特异性和方法之间的一致性也进行了调查。以钩虫为主,qPCR阳性率为70.3% (95% CI: 63.6 ~ 76.9), 1.2SNF阳性率为59.1% (95% CI: 46.3 ~ 72.4), 1.3SNF阳性率为56.5% (95% CI: 43.2 ~ 69.4), KK阳性率为47.8% (95% CI: 34.6 ~ 57.6)。各方法对类蚓蛔虫和毛滴虫的检出率均较低。经qPCR检测,人畜共患钩虫和圆线虫的检出率分别为3.0% (95% CI: 1.3 ~ 6.4)和17.3% (95% CI: 8.1 ~ 22.3)。qPCR检测到中度-患病率较高(8.3%)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harnessing Molecular Techniques to Inform Species-Specific Hookworm Prevalence and Infection Intensity and Detect Strongyloides in Dak Lak Province, Vietnam.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is an increasingly recognized diagnostic tool for soil-transmitted helminths (STHs), overcoming limitations of microscopy. We compared qPCR with Kato-Katz (KK) and sodium nitrate flotation (SNF; specific gravities 1.2 and 1.3) in determining STH prevalence and infection intensity using samples from a community survey of 351 people in Dak Lak province, Vietnam. Established correlation formulas were used to convert qPCR cycle threshold values to eggs per gram to compare infection intensity. Sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between methods were also investigated. Hookworm was the predominant STH detected, with prevalences of 70.3% (95% CI: 63.6-76.9) by qPCR, 59.1% (95% CI: 46.3-72.4) by 1.2SNF, 56.5% (95% CI: 43.2-69.4) by 1.3SNF, and 47.8% (95% CI: 34.6-57.6) by KK. Detection of Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura was low across methods. Prevalences of zoonotic hookworm Ancylostoma ceylanicum and Strongyloides species by qPCR were 3.0% (95% CI: 1.3-6.4) and 17.3% (95% CI: 8.1-22.3), respectively. qPCR detected higher prevalence of moderate- (8.3% versus <2%) and heavy-intensity (9.4% versus 0%) infections than microscopy. The sensitivities of microscopy methods were 81.0% (1.2SNF), 75.8% (1.3SNF), and 67.4% (KK). Diagnostic agreement for hookworm was moderate between qPCR and KK and between qPCR and 1.3SNF, and it was good between qPCR and 1.2SNF. The superior performance of qPCR in detecting hookworm coupled with the capacity to differentiate hookworm species and detect Strongyloides spp. supports the role of qPCR to inform control strategies, particularly for zoonotic reservoirs and use of macrocyclic lactones.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, established in 1921, is published monthly by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It is among the top-ranked tropical medicine journals in the world publishing original scientific articles and the latest science covering new research with an emphasis on population, clinical and laboratory science and the application of technology in the fields of tropical medicine, parasitology, immunology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, basic and molecular biology, virology and international medicine. The Journal publishes unsolicited peer-reviewed manuscripts, review articles, short reports, images in Clinical Tropical Medicine, case studies, reports on the efficacy of new drugs and methods of treatment, prevention and control methodologies,new testing methods and equipment, book reports and Letters to the Editor. Topics range from applied epidemiology in such relevant areas as AIDS to the molecular biology of vaccine development. The Journal is of interest to epidemiologists, parasitologists, virologists, clinicians, entomologists and public health officials who are concerned with health issues of the tropics, developing nations and emerging infectious diseases. Major granting institutions including philanthropic and governmental institutions active in the public health field, and medical and scientific libraries throughout the world purchase the Journal. Two or more supplements to the Journal on topics of special interest are published annually. These supplements represent comprehensive and multidisciplinary discussions of issues of concern to tropical disease specialists and health issues of developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信