Xia Wu , Mingxia Du , Hanqing Liu , Zihan Song , Wenlong Jia
{"title":"基于多尺度随机模型的天然气管道事故碎片危害耦合评估与风险重构","authors":"Xia Wu , Mingxia Du , Hanqing Liu , Zihan Song , Wenlong Jia","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional risk assessment models for natural gas pipeline incidents predominantly focus on jet fire thermal radiation zones, while secondary hazards caused by ejected debris—owing to challenges in quantifying the randomness of debris quantity, mass, and ejection trajectories—are often underestimated. This study proposes a multi-scale coupled model integrating stochastic debris generation mechanisms and physical ejection processes to reconfigure the dynamic propagation pathways and spatial risk distribution of debris hazards. Leveraging statistical analysis of 95 global pipeline rupture incidents from 1954 to 2024, we established a probabilistic database for debris quantity, mass distribution, and ejection angles. A cohesive crack model was employed to simulate debris generation, with Monte Carlo methods addressing ejection parameter uncertainties. Validated against the 2009 pipeline rupture incident in Ontario, Canada, the model predicted that 97.2 % of debris landed within 150 m of the rupture site, aligning closely with observed maximum ejection distances. Full-scale simulations for pipeline section 100–4 revealed a maximum debris flight distance of 263.6 m, surpassing the thermal radiation boundary (222.9 m) calculated by the ASME B31.8S standard. This study exposes the systemic underestimation of hazard zones by conventional thermal radiation models and advocates integrating debris dynamics assessments into intelligent pipeline safety management systems. Furthermore, the proposed probabilistic-physical coupling framework supports multi-hazard synergy analysis (e.g., thermal radiation-debris-soil erosion interactions), offering a decision-making paradigm for high-precision pipeline design, resilient urban infrastructure planning, and energy transportation risk mitigation in the context of carbon neutrality349.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 107344"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coupled assessment and risk reconfiguration of debris hazards in natural gas pipeline incidents via multi-scale stochastic modeling\",\"authors\":\"Xia Wu , Mingxia Du , Hanqing Liu , Zihan Song , Wenlong Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Traditional risk assessment models for natural gas pipeline incidents predominantly focus on jet fire thermal radiation zones, while secondary hazards caused by ejected debris—owing to challenges in quantifying the randomness of debris quantity, mass, and ejection trajectories—are often underestimated. This study proposes a multi-scale coupled model integrating stochastic debris generation mechanisms and physical ejection processes to reconfigure the dynamic propagation pathways and spatial risk distribution of debris hazards. Leveraging statistical analysis of 95 global pipeline rupture incidents from 1954 to 2024, we established a probabilistic database for debris quantity, mass distribution, and ejection angles. A cohesive crack model was employed to simulate debris generation, with Monte Carlo methods addressing ejection parameter uncertainties. Validated against the 2009 pipeline rupture incident in Ontario, Canada, the model predicted that 97.2 % of debris landed within 150 m of the rupture site, aligning closely with observed maximum ejection distances. Full-scale simulations for pipeline section 100–4 revealed a maximum debris flight distance of 263.6 m, surpassing the thermal radiation boundary (222.9 m) calculated by the ASME B31.8S standard. This study exposes the systemic underestimation of hazard zones by conventional thermal radiation models and advocates integrating debris dynamics assessments into intelligent pipeline safety management systems. Furthermore, the proposed probabilistic-physical coupling framework supports multi-hazard synergy analysis (e.g., thermal radiation-debris-soil erosion interactions), offering a decision-making paradigm for high-precision pipeline design, resilient urban infrastructure planning, and energy transportation risk mitigation in the context of carbon neutrality349.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025006111\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025006111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Coupled assessment and risk reconfiguration of debris hazards in natural gas pipeline incidents via multi-scale stochastic modeling
Traditional risk assessment models for natural gas pipeline incidents predominantly focus on jet fire thermal radiation zones, while secondary hazards caused by ejected debris—owing to challenges in quantifying the randomness of debris quantity, mass, and ejection trajectories—are often underestimated. This study proposes a multi-scale coupled model integrating stochastic debris generation mechanisms and physical ejection processes to reconfigure the dynamic propagation pathways and spatial risk distribution of debris hazards. Leveraging statistical analysis of 95 global pipeline rupture incidents from 1954 to 2024, we established a probabilistic database for debris quantity, mass distribution, and ejection angles. A cohesive crack model was employed to simulate debris generation, with Monte Carlo methods addressing ejection parameter uncertainties. Validated against the 2009 pipeline rupture incident in Ontario, Canada, the model predicted that 97.2 % of debris landed within 150 m of the rupture site, aligning closely with observed maximum ejection distances. Full-scale simulations for pipeline section 100–4 revealed a maximum debris flight distance of 263.6 m, surpassing the thermal radiation boundary (222.9 m) calculated by the ASME B31.8S standard. This study exposes the systemic underestimation of hazard zones by conventional thermal radiation models and advocates integrating debris dynamics assessments into intelligent pipeline safety management systems. Furthermore, the proposed probabilistic-physical coupling framework supports multi-hazard synergy analysis (e.g., thermal radiation-debris-soil erosion interactions), offering a decision-making paradigm for high-precision pipeline design, resilient urban infrastructure planning, and energy transportation risk mitigation in the context of carbon neutrality349.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.