基于quechers的商用猫狗干粮农药残留冷冻清理方法的优化与验证

IF 4 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Ana Macías-Montes , Octavio P. Luzardo , Annalisa Zaccaroni , Andrea Acosta-Dacal
{"title":"基于quechers的商用猫狗干粮农药残留冷冻清理方法的优化与验证","authors":"Ana Macías-Montes ,&nbsp;Octavio P. Luzardo ,&nbsp;Annalisa Zaccaroni ,&nbsp;Andrea Acosta-Dacal","doi":"10.1016/j.chroma.2025.466093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Addressing pesticide residues in feed for cats and dogs is essential to assess their potential impact on their health. In this study, we validated a QuEChERS-based multi-residue method for analyzing 211 pesticide residues in cat and dog feed by LC-MS/MS and GC–MS/MS. To overcome the challenges posed by the complex nature of pet feed, we refined the clean-up step, comparing PSA, EMR-Lipid, and freezing approaches. Freeze-out yielded the best results, with 91.9 % of analytes achieving recoveries within 70–120 % and RSDs≤20 %, and two freezing cycles proved sufficient for effective matrix removal while maintaining analyte recoveries. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first validated QuEChERS method to use freezing-out as a standalone clean-up strategy, offering a simplified and cost-effective solution for high-fat matrices. The method was validated in terms of linearity, accuracy, and precision. Matrix-matched calibration curves (R² ≥ 0.99) were used for all analytes. Recoveries were within 70–120 % for all spiking levels in most compounds, with a few analytes showing recoveries between 60–130 % in the extended range allowed by SANTE guidelines. All RSDs were below 20 % by established validation guidelines. The method demonstrated high sensitivity, with most analytes achieving limits of quantification below the generic 10.0 µg/kg MRL established by EU regulations for feed. Notably, over 70 % of analytes achieved LOQs at least ten times lower. All limits of detection were equal to or below 10.0 µg/kg. The method's applicability was demonstrated by analyzing 16 commercial pet feed samples, where 112 residues of 39 pesticides were detected.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography A","volume":"1756 ","pages":"Article 466093"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization and validation of a QuEChERS-based method with a freezing-out clean-up for pesticide residues in commercial dry food for dogs and cats\",\"authors\":\"Ana Macías-Montes ,&nbsp;Octavio P. Luzardo ,&nbsp;Annalisa Zaccaroni ,&nbsp;Andrea Acosta-Dacal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chroma.2025.466093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Addressing pesticide residues in feed for cats and dogs is essential to assess their potential impact on their health. In this study, we validated a QuEChERS-based multi-residue method for analyzing 211 pesticide residues in cat and dog feed by LC-MS/MS and GC–MS/MS. To overcome the challenges posed by the complex nature of pet feed, we refined the clean-up step, comparing PSA, EMR-Lipid, and freezing approaches. Freeze-out yielded the best results, with 91.9 % of analytes achieving recoveries within 70–120 % and RSDs≤20 %, and two freezing cycles proved sufficient for effective matrix removal while maintaining analyte recoveries. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first validated QuEChERS method to use freezing-out as a standalone clean-up strategy, offering a simplified and cost-effective solution for high-fat matrices. The method was validated in terms of linearity, accuracy, and precision. Matrix-matched calibration curves (R² ≥ 0.99) were used for all analytes. Recoveries were within 70–120 % for all spiking levels in most compounds, with a few analytes showing recoveries between 60–130 % in the extended range allowed by SANTE guidelines. All RSDs were below 20 % by established validation guidelines. The method demonstrated high sensitivity, with most analytes achieving limits of quantification below the generic 10.0 µg/kg MRL established by EU regulations for feed. Notably, over 70 % of analytes achieved LOQs at least ten times lower. All limits of detection were equal to or below 10.0 µg/kg. The method's applicability was demonstrated by analyzing 16 commercial pet feed samples, where 112 residues of 39 pesticides were detected.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chromatography A\",\"volume\":\"1756 \",\"pages\":\"Article 466093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chromatography A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967325004388\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967325004388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

解决猫和狗饲料中的农药残留问题对于评估其对其健康的潜在影响至关重要。在本研究中,我们验证了基于quechers的多残留分析方法(LC-MS/MS和GC-MS /MS)对猫和狗饲料中211种农药残留的分析。为了克服宠物饲料的复杂性所带来的挑战,我们改进了清理步骤,比较了PSA、emr -脂质和冷冻方法。冻结的效果最好,91.9%的分析物回收率在70 - 120%之间,rsd≤20%,两次冻结循环足以在保持分析物回收率的同时有效去除基质。据我们所知,这是第一个将冷冻作为独立清理策略的经过验证的QuEChERS方法,为高脂肪基质提供了一种简化且经济高效的解决方案。从线性度、准确度、精密度等方面对该方法进行了验证。所有分析物均采用矩阵匹配校准曲线(R²≥0.99)。在大多数化合物中,所有峰值水平的回收率在70 - 120%之间,在SANTE指南允许的扩展范围内,少数分析物的回收率在60 - 130%之间。根据既定的验证指南,所有rsd均低于20%。该方法具有很高的灵敏度,大多数分析物的定量限低于欧盟饲料法规规定的通用10.0µg/kg MRL。值得注意的是,超过70%的分析物的loq至少降低了10倍。所有检出限均等于或低于10.0µg/kg。通过对16份市售宠物饲料样品进行分析,共检测出39种农药的112种残留,验证了该方法的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization and validation of a QuEChERS-based method with a freezing-out clean-up for pesticide residues in commercial dry food for dogs and cats
Addressing pesticide residues in feed for cats and dogs is essential to assess their potential impact on their health. In this study, we validated a QuEChERS-based multi-residue method for analyzing 211 pesticide residues in cat and dog feed by LC-MS/MS and GC–MS/MS. To overcome the challenges posed by the complex nature of pet feed, we refined the clean-up step, comparing PSA, EMR-Lipid, and freezing approaches. Freeze-out yielded the best results, with 91.9 % of analytes achieving recoveries within 70–120 % and RSDs≤20 %, and two freezing cycles proved sufficient for effective matrix removal while maintaining analyte recoveries. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first validated QuEChERS method to use freezing-out as a standalone clean-up strategy, offering a simplified and cost-effective solution for high-fat matrices. The method was validated in terms of linearity, accuracy, and precision. Matrix-matched calibration curves (R² ≥ 0.99) were used for all analytes. Recoveries were within 70–120 % for all spiking levels in most compounds, with a few analytes showing recoveries between 60–130 % in the extended range allowed by SANTE guidelines. All RSDs were below 20 % by established validation guidelines. The method demonstrated high sensitivity, with most analytes achieving limits of quantification below the generic 10.0 µg/kg MRL established by EU regulations for feed. Notably, over 70 % of analytes achieved LOQs at least ten times lower. All limits of detection were equal to or below 10.0 µg/kg. The method's applicability was demonstrated by analyzing 16 commercial pet feed samples, where 112 residues of 39 pesticides were detected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography A
Journal of Chromatography A 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
14.60%
发文量
742
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography A provides a forum for the publication of original research and critical reviews on all aspects of fundamental and applied separation science. The scope of the journal includes chromatography and related techniques, electromigration techniques (e.g. electrophoresis, electrochromatography), hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, sample preparation, and detection methods such as mass spectrometry. Contributions consist mainly of research papers dealing with the theory of separation methods, instrumental developments and analytical and preparative applications of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信