Yi Xiao , Xi Rao , Ming Chang , Liang Chen , Huan Huang
{"title":"城市抗洪能力评价与障碍因素识别——以中国三大城市群为例","authors":"Yi Xiao , Xi Rao , Ming Chang , Liang Chen , Huan Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban flooding has emerged as a structural challenge that hinders the resilient transformation of cities in the context of intensifying global climate change and frequent extreme weather events. However, comprehensive and systematic comparative analyses at the urban agglomeration scale are relatively scarce. To address this gap, this study developed a multidimensional evaluation framework (EEISI) that integrates economic, ecological, infrastructural, social, and institutional resilience. Based on the CRITIC-TOPSIS weighted evaluation model and the Coupling Coordination Degree (CCD) model, this study measures urban flood resilience and the interactions among resilience subsystems in China’s three major urban agglomerations. Furthermore, this study employs the Standard Deviational Ellipse (SDE) model to explore their spatial–temporal evolution patterns and identify key constraints to resilience enhancement through an obstacle degree model. Key findings indicate: (1) UFR exhibits phased fluctuations with an upward trend, yet significant developmental disparities persist between core and peripheral cities, with the Pearl River Delta demonstrates systemic advantages through subsystem optimization; (2) Subsystem coordination has gradually improved but remains at a primary coordination level, reflecting imperfect cross-system governance mechanisms; (3) Structural fiscal allocation imbalances and fragmented institutional supply constitute the primary obstacles, manifested in constraints such as governmental governance capacity, municipal maintenance funding, and the adequacy of the social security system; This study enriches and refines the existing research indicator system, providing theoretical references for flood resilience capacity building and the practice of resilient city development in urban agglomerations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 113659"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of urban flood resilience and obstacle factors identification: A case study of three major urban agglomerations in China\",\"authors\":\"Yi Xiao , Xi Rao , Ming Chang , Liang Chen , Huan Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urban flooding has emerged as a structural challenge that hinders the resilient transformation of cities in the context of intensifying global climate change and frequent extreme weather events. However, comprehensive and systematic comparative analyses at the urban agglomeration scale are relatively scarce. To address this gap, this study developed a multidimensional evaluation framework (EEISI) that integrates economic, ecological, infrastructural, social, and institutional resilience. Based on the CRITIC-TOPSIS weighted evaluation model and the Coupling Coordination Degree (CCD) model, this study measures urban flood resilience and the interactions among resilience subsystems in China’s three major urban agglomerations. Furthermore, this study employs the Standard Deviational Ellipse (SDE) model to explore their spatial–temporal evolution patterns and identify key constraints to resilience enhancement through an obstacle degree model. Key findings indicate: (1) UFR exhibits phased fluctuations with an upward trend, yet significant developmental disparities persist between core and peripheral cities, with the Pearl River Delta demonstrates systemic advantages through subsystem optimization; (2) Subsystem coordination has gradually improved but remains at a primary coordination level, reflecting imperfect cross-system governance mechanisms; (3) Structural fiscal allocation imbalances and fragmented institutional supply constitute the primary obstacles, manifested in constraints such as governmental governance capacity, municipal maintenance funding, and the adequacy of the social security system; This study enriches and refines the existing research indicator system, providing theoretical references for flood resilience capacity building and the practice of resilient city development in urban agglomerations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"176 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113659\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005898\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005898","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of urban flood resilience and obstacle factors identification: A case study of three major urban agglomerations in China
Urban flooding has emerged as a structural challenge that hinders the resilient transformation of cities in the context of intensifying global climate change and frequent extreme weather events. However, comprehensive and systematic comparative analyses at the urban agglomeration scale are relatively scarce. To address this gap, this study developed a multidimensional evaluation framework (EEISI) that integrates economic, ecological, infrastructural, social, and institutional resilience. Based on the CRITIC-TOPSIS weighted evaluation model and the Coupling Coordination Degree (CCD) model, this study measures urban flood resilience and the interactions among resilience subsystems in China’s three major urban agglomerations. Furthermore, this study employs the Standard Deviational Ellipse (SDE) model to explore their spatial–temporal evolution patterns and identify key constraints to resilience enhancement through an obstacle degree model. Key findings indicate: (1) UFR exhibits phased fluctuations with an upward trend, yet significant developmental disparities persist between core and peripheral cities, with the Pearl River Delta demonstrates systemic advantages through subsystem optimization; (2) Subsystem coordination has gradually improved but remains at a primary coordination level, reflecting imperfect cross-system governance mechanisms; (3) Structural fiscal allocation imbalances and fragmented institutional supply constitute the primary obstacles, manifested in constraints such as governmental governance capacity, municipal maintenance funding, and the adequacy of the social security system; This study enriches and refines the existing research indicator system, providing theoretical references for flood resilience capacity building and the practice of resilient city development in urban agglomerations.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.