城市抗洪能力评价与障碍因素识别——以中国三大城市群为例

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yi Xiao , Xi Rao , Ming Chang , Liang Chen , Huan Huang
{"title":"城市抗洪能力评价与障碍因素识别——以中国三大城市群为例","authors":"Yi Xiao ,&nbsp;Xi Rao ,&nbsp;Ming Chang ,&nbsp;Liang Chen ,&nbsp;Huan Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban flooding has emerged as a structural challenge that hinders the resilient transformation of cities in the context of intensifying global climate change and frequent extreme weather events. However, comprehensive and systematic comparative analyses at the urban agglomeration scale are relatively scarce. To address this gap, this study developed a multidimensional evaluation framework (EEISI) that integrates economic, ecological, infrastructural, social, and institutional resilience. Based on the CRITIC-TOPSIS weighted evaluation model and the Coupling Coordination Degree (CCD) model, this study measures urban flood resilience and the interactions among resilience subsystems in China’s three major urban agglomerations. Furthermore, this study employs the Standard Deviational Ellipse (SDE) model to explore their spatial–temporal evolution patterns and identify key constraints to resilience enhancement through an obstacle degree model. Key findings indicate: (1) UFR exhibits phased fluctuations with an upward trend, yet significant developmental disparities persist between core and peripheral cities, with the Pearl River Delta demonstrates systemic advantages through subsystem optimization; (2) Subsystem coordination has gradually improved but remains at a primary coordination level, reflecting imperfect cross-system governance mechanisms; (3) Structural fiscal allocation imbalances and fragmented institutional supply constitute the primary obstacles, manifested in constraints such as governmental governance capacity, municipal maintenance funding, and the adequacy of the social security system; This study enriches and refines the existing research indicator system, providing theoretical references for flood resilience capacity building and the practice of resilient city development in urban agglomerations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 113659"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of urban flood resilience and obstacle factors identification: A case study of three major urban agglomerations in China\",\"authors\":\"Yi Xiao ,&nbsp;Xi Rao ,&nbsp;Ming Chang ,&nbsp;Liang Chen ,&nbsp;Huan Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urban flooding has emerged as a structural challenge that hinders the resilient transformation of cities in the context of intensifying global climate change and frequent extreme weather events. However, comprehensive and systematic comparative analyses at the urban agglomeration scale are relatively scarce. To address this gap, this study developed a multidimensional evaluation framework (EEISI) that integrates economic, ecological, infrastructural, social, and institutional resilience. Based on the CRITIC-TOPSIS weighted evaluation model and the Coupling Coordination Degree (CCD) model, this study measures urban flood resilience and the interactions among resilience subsystems in China’s three major urban agglomerations. Furthermore, this study employs the Standard Deviational Ellipse (SDE) model to explore their spatial–temporal evolution patterns and identify key constraints to resilience enhancement through an obstacle degree model. Key findings indicate: (1) UFR exhibits phased fluctuations with an upward trend, yet significant developmental disparities persist between core and peripheral cities, with the Pearl River Delta demonstrates systemic advantages through subsystem optimization; (2) Subsystem coordination has gradually improved but remains at a primary coordination level, reflecting imperfect cross-system governance mechanisms; (3) Structural fiscal allocation imbalances and fragmented institutional supply constitute the primary obstacles, manifested in constraints such as governmental governance capacity, municipal maintenance funding, and the adequacy of the social security system; This study enriches and refines the existing research indicator system, providing theoretical references for flood resilience capacity building and the practice of resilient city development in urban agglomerations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"176 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113659\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005898\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005898","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球气候变化加剧和极端天气事件频发的背景下,城市洪水已成为阻碍城市弹性转型的结构性挑战。然而,在城市群尺度上进行全面、系统的比较分析相对缺乏。为了解决这一差距,本研究开发了一个多维评估框架(EEISI),该框架整合了经济、生态、基础设施、社会和制度弹性。基于critical - topsis加权评价模型和耦合协调度(CCD)模型,对中国三大城市群的城市抗洪能力和抗洪能力子系统之间的相互作用进行了测度。在此基础上,采用标准偏差椭圆(SDE)模型探讨了恢复力的时空演化规律,并通过障碍度模型识别了恢复力增强的关键制约因素。研究结果表明:(1)城市综合生产率呈现阶段性波动和上升趋势,但核心城市与周边城市发展差异明显,珠三角通过子系统优化呈现出系统优势;(2)各子系统协调水平逐步提高,但仍停留在初级协调水平,反映出跨系统治理机制不完善;(3)财政配置结构性失衡和制度供给碎片化是主要障碍,主要表现在政府治理能力、市政维护资金、社会保障体系充分性等方面的制约;本研究丰富和完善了已有的研究指标体系,为城市群抗洪能力建设和抗洪城市发展实践提供理论参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of urban flood resilience and obstacle factors identification: A case study of three major urban agglomerations in China
Urban flooding has emerged as a structural challenge that hinders the resilient transformation of cities in the context of intensifying global climate change and frequent extreme weather events. However, comprehensive and systematic comparative analyses at the urban agglomeration scale are relatively scarce. To address this gap, this study developed a multidimensional evaluation framework (EEISI) that integrates economic, ecological, infrastructural, social, and institutional resilience. Based on the CRITIC-TOPSIS weighted evaluation model and the Coupling Coordination Degree (CCD) model, this study measures urban flood resilience and the interactions among resilience subsystems in China’s three major urban agglomerations. Furthermore, this study employs the Standard Deviational Ellipse (SDE) model to explore their spatial–temporal evolution patterns and identify key constraints to resilience enhancement through an obstacle degree model. Key findings indicate: (1) UFR exhibits phased fluctuations with an upward trend, yet significant developmental disparities persist between core and peripheral cities, with the Pearl River Delta demonstrates systemic advantages through subsystem optimization; (2) Subsystem coordination has gradually improved but remains at a primary coordination level, reflecting imperfect cross-system governance mechanisms; (3) Structural fiscal allocation imbalances and fragmented institutional supply constitute the primary obstacles, manifested in constraints such as governmental governance capacity, municipal maintenance funding, and the adequacy of the social security system; This study enriches and refines the existing research indicator system, providing theoretical references for flood resilience capacity building and the practice of resilient city development in urban agglomerations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信