Kashif Ahmed, Aurangzeb Kalhoro, Zaheen Shibli, Abdul Hashim
{"title":"伽玛刀放射治疗顽固性三叉神经痛-单一与两个等中心靶点的比较研究。","authors":"Kashif Ahmed, Aurangzeb Kalhoro, Zaheen Shibli, Abdul Hashim","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.44110-23.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the safety and efficacy of using Two isocenter targets in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) for treating trigeminal neuralgia (TN) versus a single isocenter target solely at the root entry zone (REZ).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted.The study involved 171 patients with severe facial pain caused by TN. Pain intensity was measured using a pre/post-BNI scale. Group A (85 patients) received 90 Gy using a single isocenter at REZ with a 4mm collimator, while Group B (86 patients) received 90 Gy at two isocenters of the REZ and distal cisternal segment. Statistical analyses were done to assess differences between post-BNI scores and pain-free durations in the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups had a mean patient age of 50 years. Group A had a longer presurgical pain duration (98 months) than Group B (78 months). In Group A, 33% reported pain relief to BNI class II and 67% to class III, while in Group B, 70% reported pain relief to BNI class I and 30% to BNI class II. Group A had a 40% 8-week pain relief rate, while Group B had a higher percentage of painfree durations of 6-7 weeks (21%) and 9 weeks (39%). Group B had a higher incidence of post-op facial numbness (27% vs. 14% in Group A). Significant differences existed between post-BNI pain intensities and pain-free durations in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who received 90 Gy radiation at two isocenters had better outcomes than those with a single isocenter for GKRS. While Group B experienced earlier pain relief, Group A had fewer side effects. Two-isocenter GKRS is a safe and effective alternative for TN patients with a better pain management profile but an increased risk of facial hypoesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":"35 3","pages":"484-491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Intractable Trigeminal Neuralgia - Comparative Study Between Single Versus Two Isocenter Targets.\",\"authors\":\"Kashif Ahmed, Aurangzeb Kalhoro, Zaheen Shibli, Abdul Hashim\",\"doi\":\"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.44110-23.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the safety and efficacy of using Two isocenter targets in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) for treating trigeminal neuralgia (TN) versus a single isocenter target solely at the root entry zone (REZ).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted.The study involved 171 patients with severe facial pain caused by TN. Pain intensity was measured using a pre/post-BNI scale. Group A (85 patients) received 90 Gy using a single isocenter at REZ with a 4mm collimator, while Group B (86 patients) received 90 Gy at two isocenters of the REZ and distal cisternal segment. Statistical analyses were done to assess differences between post-BNI scores and pain-free durations in the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups had a mean patient age of 50 years. Group A had a longer presurgical pain duration (98 months) than Group B (78 months). In Group A, 33% reported pain relief to BNI class II and 67% to class III, while in Group B, 70% reported pain relief to BNI class I and 30% to BNI class II. Group A had a 40% 8-week pain relief rate, while Group B had a higher percentage of painfree durations of 6-7 weeks (21%) and 9 weeks (39%). Group B had a higher incidence of post-op facial numbness (27% vs. 14% in Group A). Significant differences existed between post-BNI pain intensities and pain-free durations in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who received 90 Gy radiation at two isocenters had better outcomes than those with a single isocenter for GKRS. While Group B experienced earlier pain relief, Group A had fewer side effects. Two-isocenter GKRS is a safe and effective alternative for TN patients with a better pain management profile but an increased risk of facial hypoesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"484-491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.44110-23.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.44110-23.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估伽玛刀放射治疗(GKRS)中使用两个等中心靶点与仅在根入口区(REZ)使用单个等中心靶点治疗三叉神经痛(TN)的安全性和有效性。材料与方法:回顾性研究。该研究涉及171例由TN引起的严重面部疼痛患者。使用bni前/后量表测量疼痛强度。A组(85名患者)在REZ处使用一个4mm准直器接受90 Gy,而B组(86名患者)在REZ和远端池段的两个等中心接受90 Gy。统计分析后bni评分和各组无痛持续时间之间的差异。结果:两组患者平均年龄均为50岁。A组手术前疼痛持续时间(98个月)比B组(78个月)长。在A组中,33%的患者报告BNI II级疼痛缓解,67%的患者报告BNI III级疼痛缓解,而在B组中,70%的患者报告BNI I级疼痛缓解,30%的患者报告BNI II级疼痛缓解。A组8周疼痛缓解率为40%,而B组6-7周(21%)和9周(39%)的无痛持续时间百分比更高。B组术后面部麻木发生率较高(27% vs. a组14%)。两组术后疼痛强度和无痛持续时间存在显著差异。结论:两个等中心90gy的GKRS治疗效果优于单一等中心治疗。B组的疼痛缓解时间较早,而A组的副作用较少。双等中心GKRS是TN患者的一种安全有效的替代方案,具有更好的疼痛管理概况,但增加了面部感觉减退的风险。
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Intractable Trigeminal Neuralgia - Comparative Study Between Single Versus Two Isocenter Targets.
Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of using Two isocenter targets in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) for treating trigeminal neuralgia (TN) versus a single isocenter target solely at the root entry zone (REZ).
Material and methods: A retrospective study was conducted.The study involved 171 patients with severe facial pain caused by TN. Pain intensity was measured using a pre/post-BNI scale. Group A (85 patients) received 90 Gy using a single isocenter at REZ with a 4mm collimator, while Group B (86 patients) received 90 Gy at two isocenters of the REZ and distal cisternal segment. Statistical analyses were done to assess differences between post-BNI scores and pain-free durations in the groups.
Results: Both groups had a mean patient age of 50 years. Group A had a longer presurgical pain duration (98 months) than Group B (78 months). In Group A, 33% reported pain relief to BNI class II and 67% to class III, while in Group B, 70% reported pain relief to BNI class I and 30% to BNI class II. Group A had a 40% 8-week pain relief rate, while Group B had a higher percentage of painfree durations of 6-7 weeks (21%) and 9 weeks (39%). Group B had a higher incidence of post-op facial numbness (27% vs. 14% in Group A). Significant differences existed between post-BNI pain intensities and pain-free durations in both groups.
Conclusion: Patients who received 90 Gy radiation at two isocenters had better outcomes than those with a single isocenter for GKRS. While Group B experienced earlier pain relief, Group A had fewer side effects. Two-isocenter GKRS is a safe and effective alternative for TN patients with a better pain management profile but an increased risk of facial hypoesthesia.