Pernille Hansen, H Nygaard, M Schultz, F Dela, P Aagaard, Jesper Ryg, C Suetta
{"title":"在行动受限的老年人中,虚弱与跌倒史有关——来自BIOFRAIL研究的横断面多变量分析。","authors":"Pernille Hansen, H Nygaard, M Schultz, F Dela, P Aagaard, Jesper Ryg, C Suetta","doi":"10.1007/s41999-025-01239-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify differences in characteristics between mobility-limited older adults with a history of falls and those at risk of falling but who have not yet fallen.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Frailty and muscle strength were characteristics distinguishing between older adults with a history of falls and those absent of falls despite an increased risk of falling.</p><p><strong>Message: </strong>Frailty should be incorporated alongside handgrip strength (HGS) and sit-to-stand (STS) tests into routine evaluations of mobility-limited older adults referred for fall assessment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to identify differences in characteristics between mobility-limited older adults with a history of falls and those at risk of falling, and to identify the parameter with the strongest predictive value on the risk of falling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data included anthropometry, HGS, 30-s and 5-reps STS tests, maximal isometric knee extensor strength, gait speed (6 m), postural balance (tandem test), and muscle mass (BIA). Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and sarcopenia was evaluated according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2) guidelines. Outcomes of falls (past year), and depression (Geriatric Depression Scale 15) were self-reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally, 505 mobility-limited older adults (mean age 79.7 ± 6.3 years, 64.8% females) were included. Of these, 400 (79.2%) had experienced one or more falls within the past year (fallers), while 105 (20.8%) had not experienced a fall (at risk). Patients with experienced falls were more likely to feel depressed, had reduced handgrip strength, and reduced performance in both STS tests compared to those who had not fallen. Frailty was the strongest individual parameter associated with a history of prior falls, even after adjusting for covariates such as depression and 30-s STS (aOR 3.80; 95% CI 1.70-8.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Present study identified frailty as a key factor independently associated with a history of falls in this population. Additionally, handgrip strength and STS performance were key characteristics distinguishing between older adults with a history of falls within the past 12 months and those at risk of falling.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05795556.</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1283-1293"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frailty is associated with a history of falls among mobility-limited older adults-cross-sectional multivariate analysis from the BIOFRAIL study.\",\"authors\":\"Pernille Hansen, H Nygaard, M Schultz, F Dela, P Aagaard, Jesper Ryg, C Suetta\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41999-025-01239-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify differences in characteristics between mobility-limited older adults with a history of falls and those at risk of falling but who have not yet fallen.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Frailty and muscle strength were characteristics distinguishing between older adults with a history of falls and those absent of falls despite an increased risk of falling.</p><p><strong>Message: </strong>Frailty should be incorporated alongside handgrip strength (HGS) and sit-to-stand (STS) tests into routine evaluations of mobility-limited older adults referred for fall assessment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to identify differences in characteristics between mobility-limited older adults with a history of falls and those at risk of falling, and to identify the parameter with the strongest predictive value on the risk of falling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data included anthropometry, HGS, 30-s and 5-reps STS tests, maximal isometric knee extensor strength, gait speed (6 m), postural balance (tandem test), and muscle mass (BIA). Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and sarcopenia was evaluated according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2) guidelines. Outcomes of falls (past year), and depression (Geriatric Depression Scale 15) were self-reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally, 505 mobility-limited older adults (mean age 79.7 ± 6.3 years, 64.8% females) were included. Of these, 400 (79.2%) had experienced one or more falls within the past year (fallers), while 105 (20.8%) had not experienced a fall (at risk). Patients with experienced falls were more likely to feel depressed, had reduced handgrip strength, and reduced performance in both STS tests compared to those who had not fallen. Frailty was the strongest individual parameter associated with a history of prior falls, even after adjusting for covariates such as depression and 30-s STS (aOR 3.80; 95% CI 1.70-8.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Present study identified frailty as a key factor independently associated with a history of falls in this population. Additionally, handgrip strength and STS performance were key characteristics distinguishing between older adults with a history of falls within the past 12 months and those at risk of falling.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05795556.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Geriatric Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1283-1293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378287/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Geriatric Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01239-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01239-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:确定有跌倒史的行动受限老年人与有跌倒风险但尚未跌倒的老年人之间的特征差异。研究结果:虚弱和肌肉力量是区分有跌倒史的老年人和尽管跌倒风险增加但没有跌倒的老年人的特征。信息:虚弱应与握力(HGS)和坐立(STS)测试一起纳入转到跌倒评估的行动受限老年人的常规评估。目的:我们旨在确定有跌倒史的行动受限老年人和有跌倒风险的老年人之间特征的差异,并确定对跌倒风险具有最强预测价值的参数。方法:数据包括人体测量、HGS、30-s和5次STS测试、最大等距膝关节伸肌力量、步态速度(6 m)、姿势平衡(串联测试)和肌肉质量(BIA)。使用临床虚弱量表(CFS)评估虚弱,根据欧洲老年人肌肉减少症工作组2 (EWGSOP2)指南评估肌肉减少症。跌倒(过去一年)和抑郁(老年抑郁量表15)的结果是自我报告的。结果:共纳入505例活动受限老年人,平均年龄79.7±6.3岁,女性64.8%。其中,400人(79.2%)在过去一年内跌倒过一次或多次(跌倒者),105人(20.8%)没有跌倒过(有跌倒风险)。与没有跌倒过的患者相比,经历过跌倒的患者更容易感到抑郁,握力下降,两项STS测试的表现也较差。虚弱是与先前跌倒史相关的最强个体参数,即使在调整了抑郁和30-s STS等协变量后也是如此(aOR 3.80;95% ci 1.70-8.50)。结论:目前的研究确定虚弱是与该人群跌倒史独立相关的关键因素。此外,握力和STS表现是区分过去12个月内有跌倒史的老年人和有跌倒风险的老年人的关键特征。试验注册:NCT05795556。
Frailty is associated with a history of falls among mobility-limited older adults-cross-sectional multivariate analysis from the BIOFRAIL study.
Aim: To identify differences in characteristics between mobility-limited older adults with a history of falls and those at risk of falling but who have not yet fallen.
Findings: Frailty and muscle strength were characteristics distinguishing between older adults with a history of falls and those absent of falls despite an increased risk of falling.
Message: Frailty should be incorporated alongside handgrip strength (HGS) and sit-to-stand (STS) tests into routine evaluations of mobility-limited older adults referred for fall assessment.
Purpose: We aimed to identify differences in characteristics between mobility-limited older adults with a history of falls and those at risk of falling, and to identify the parameter with the strongest predictive value on the risk of falling.
Methods: Data included anthropometry, HGS, 30-s and 5-reps STS tests, maximal isometric knee extensor strength, gait speed (6 m), postural balance (tandem test), and muscle mass (BIA). Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and sarcopenia was evaluated according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2) guidelines. Outcomes of falls (past year), and depression (Geriatric Depression Scale 15) were self-reported.
Results: Totally, 505 mobility-limited older adults (mean age 79.7 ± 6.3 years, 64.8% females) were included. Of these, 400 (79.2%) had experienced one or more falls within the past year (fallers), while 105 (20.8%) had not experienced a fall (at risk). Patients with experienced falls were more likely to feel depressed, had reduced handgrip strength, and reduced performance in both STS tests compared to those who had not fallen. Frailty was the strongest individual parameter associated with a history of prior falls, even after adjusting for covariates such as depression and 30-s STS (aOR 3.80; 95% CI 1.70-8.50).
Conclusions: Present study identified frailty as a key factor independently associated with a history of falls in this population. Additionally, handgrip strength and STS performance were key characteristics distinguishing between older adults with a history of falls within the past 12 months and those at risk of falling.
期刊介绍:
European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine.
The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.