FlexO2:一种患者控制的氧流量选择器,可提高长期氧疗(LTOT)的自主性和日常功能。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Michael Runold, Ingegerd Karlsson, Magda Borén
{"title":"FlexO2:一种患者控制的氧流量选择器,可提高长期氧疗(LTOT)的自主性和日常功能。","authors":"Michael Runold, Ingegerd Karlsson, Magda Borén","doi":"10.1186/s12931-025-03274-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic respiratory insufficiency associated with severe resting hypoxemia necessitates long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), yet existing devices often impede daily activities due to cumbersome flow adjustments, increasing reliance on caregivers. FlexO2 is a novel mechanical regulator that enables switching between preset oxygen flow rates for rest and activity. This proof-of-concept study evaluated its impact on patient autonomy, physical activity, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a consecutive, non-randomized pre-post intervention proof-of-concept study at Karolinska University Hospital, 26 patients on LTOT (median age 77; 69% COPD) used FlexO2 for three months. The device, worn around the neck, allowed patients to self-adjust oxygen doses without accessing the concentrator. Outcomes included ease of use measured by visual analogue scale (VAS), physical activity levels, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), EQ-5D-5 L index, and frequency of dose adjustments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ease of dose adjustment increased from a VAS score of 14 to 92 (p < 0.001), with 92% of patients reporting improved ease of adjustment (baseline 7.7%; p < 0.001). Daily adjustment frequency doubled (8 to 15; p = 0.001). Patient-reported activity capacity improved from a VAS of 11 to 80 (p < 0.001). Quality-of-life scores measured by VAS increased from 19 to 61 (p < 0.001), while CAT scores decreased from a median of 26.0 to 22.5 (p = 0.05). The EQ-5D-5 L index remained stable (0.68 to 0.70; p = 0.7), although 38% of patients showed individual improvements. Device usability was high (83% satisfaction), though 15% reported tubing tangling or airflow issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FlexO2 significantly improved the ease of oxygen dose adjustment and physical activity capacity, potentially enhancing patient autonomy in LTOT. While overall patient-reported quality-of-life scores improved, objective quality-of-life outcomes remained stable. Further studies are warranted to explore long-term clinical outcomes and the potential impact on caregiver burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":49131,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"200"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FlexO2: A patient-controlled oxygen flow selector improving autonomy and daily function in long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT).\",\"authors\":\"Michael Runold, Ingegerd Karlsson, Magda Borén\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12931-025-03274-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic respiratory insufficiency associated with severe resting hypoxemia necessitates long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), yet existing devices often impede daily activities due to cumbersome flow adjustments, increasing reliance on caregivers. FlexO2 is a novel mechanical regulator that enables switching between preset oxygen flow rates for rest and activity. This proof-of-concept study evaluated its impact on patient autonomy, physical activity, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a consecutive, non-randomized pre-post intervention proof-of-concept study at Karolinska University Hospital, 26 patients on LTOT (median age 77; 69% COPD) used FlexO2 for three months. The device, worn around the neck, allowed patients to self-adjust oxygen doses without accessing the concentrator. Outcomes included ease of use measured by visual analogue scale (VAS), physical activity levels, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), EQ-5D-5 L index, and frequency of dose adjustments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ease of dose adjustment increased from a VAS score of 14 to 92 (p < 0.001), with 92% of patients reporting improved ease of adjustment (baseline 7.7%; p < 0.001). Daily adjustment frequency doubled (8 to 15; p = 0.001). Patient-reported activity capacity improved from a VAS of 11 to 80 (p < 0.001). Quality-of-life scores measured by VAS increased from 19 to 61 (p < 0.001), while CAT scores decreased from a median of 26.0 to 22.5 (p = 0.05). The EQ-5D-5 L index remained stable (0.68 to 0.70; p = 0.7), although 38% of patients showed individual improvements. Device usability was high (83% satisfaction), though 15% reported tubing tangling or airflow issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FlexO2 significantly improved the ease of oxygen dose adjustment and physical activity capacity, potentially enhancing patient autonomy in LTOT. While overall patient-reported quality-of-life scores improved, objective quality-of-life outcomes remained stable. Further studies are warranted to explore long-term clinical outcomes and the potential impact on caregiver burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107881/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-025-03274-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-025-03274-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性呼吸功能不全与严重静息低氧血症相关,需要长期氧疗(LTOT),然而现有的设备往往由于繁琐的流量调节而妨碍日常活动,增加了对护理人员的依赖。FlexO2是一种新颖的机械调节器,可以在休息和活动时预设的氧气流量之间切换。这项概念验证研究评估了其对患者自主性、身体活动和生活质量的影响。方法:在卡罗林斯卡大学医院进行的一项连续的、非随机的干预前后概念验证研究中,26例接受LTOT治疗的患者(中位年龄77;69% COPD)使用FlexO2 3个月。这种装置可以戴在脖子上,让患者在不使用浓缩器的情况下自行调整氧气剂量。结果包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)、体力活动水平、COPD评估测试(CAT)、eq - 5d - 5l指数和剂量调整频率。结果:VAS评分从14分增加到92分(p)。结论:FlexO2显著改善了氧剂量调整的便便性和身体活动能力,可能增强患者在LTOT中的自主性。虽然患者报告的总体生活质量得分有所提高,但客观生活质量结果保持稳定。需要进一步的研究来探索长期临床结果和对护理人员负担的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FlexO2: A patient-controlled oxygen flow selector improving autonomy and daily function in long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT).

Background: Chronic respiratory insufficiency associated with severe resting hypoxemia necessitates long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), yet existing devices often impede daily activities due to cumbersome flow adjustments, increasing reliance on caregivers. FlexO2 is a novel mechanical regulator that enables switching between preset oxygen flow rates for rest and activity. This proof-of-concept study evaluated its impact on patient autonomy, physical activity, and quality of life.

Methods: In a consecutive, non-randomized pre-post intervention proof-of-concept study at Karolinska University Hospital, 26 patients on LTOT (median age 77; 69% COPD) used FlexO2 for three months. The device, worn around the neck, allowed patients to self-adjust oxygen doses without accessing the concentrator. Outcomes included ease of use measured by visual analogue scale (VAS), physical activity levels, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), EQ-5D-5 L index, and frequency of dose adjustments.

Results: Ease of dose adjustment increased from a VAS score of 14 to 92 (p < 0.001), with 92% of patients reporting improved ease of adjustment (baseline 7.7%; p < 0.001). Daily adjustment frequency doubled (8 to 15; p = 0.001). Patient-reported activity capacity improved from a VAS of 11 to 80 (p < 0.001). Quality-of-life scores measured by VAS increased from 19 to 61 (p < 0.001), while CAT scores decreased from a median of 26.0 to 22.5 (p = 0.05). The EQ-5D-5 L index remained stable (0.68 to 0.70; p = 0.7), although 38% of patients showed individual improvements. Device usability was high (83% satisfaction), though 15% reported tubing tangling or airflow issues.

Conclusion: FlexO2 significantly improved the ease of oxygen dose adjustment and physical activity capacity, potentially enhancing patient autonomy in LTOT. While overall patient-reported quality-of-life scores improved, objective quality-of-life outcomes remained stable. Further studies are warranted to explore long-term clinical outcomes and the potential impact on caregiver burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory Research
Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
1.70%
发文量
314
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Respiratory Research publishes high-quality clinical and basic research, review and commentary articles on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related diseases. As the leading fully open access journal in the field, Respiratory Research provides an essential resource for pulmonologists, allergists, immunologists and other physicians, researchers, healthcare workers and medical students with worldwide dissemination of articles resulting in high visibility and generating international discussion. Topics of specific interest include asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, genetics, infectious diseases, interstitial lung diseases, lung development, lung tumors, occupational and environmental factors, pulmonary circulation, pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics, respiratory immunology, respiratory physiology, and sleep-related respiratory problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信