发展革兰氏阴性血流感染的个性化随访血培养方法:叙述性回顾。

IF 2.9 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Renatos-Nikolaos Tziolos, Diamantis P Kofteridis
{"title":"发展革兰氏阴性血流感染的个性化随访血培养方法:叙述性回顾。","authors":"Renatos-Nikolaos Tziolos, Diamantis P Kofteridis","doi":"10.3390/diseases13050156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The utility of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) in Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSIs) remains controversial. The lack of randomized controlled trials and guidelines has led to the inappropriate use of unnecessary FUBCs, increasing costs, the length of hospital stays, and antibiotic use. In this review, we aim to evaluate the strengths and limitations of the most significant studies on FUBCs in GN-BSIs, proposing a more personalized approach for using FUBCs in GN-BSIs. FUBCs seem to have a low yield of persistent positive BC in uncomplicated GN-BSIs and no effect on mortality, but some selected patients may benefit. Available studies show different results regarding the mortality and benefit of FUBCs, mainly due to differences in methodology and patient characteristics. However, selected patients with endovascular infections, central venous catheters, unfavorable responses, and no source control seem to benefit the most. Randomized controlled trials are warranted in order to confirm these indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":72832,"journal":{"name":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Personalized Approach to Follow-Up Blood Cultures in Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections: A Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Renatos-Nikolaos Tziolos, Diamantis P Kofteridis\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diseases13050156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The utility of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) in Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSIs) remains controversial. The lack of randomized controlled trials and guidelines has led to the inappropriate use of unnecessary FUBCs, increasing costs, the length of hospital stays, and antibiotic use. In this review, we aim to evaluate the strengths and limitations of the most significant studies on FUBCs in GN-BSIs, proposing a more personalized approach for using FUBCs in GN-BSIs. FUBCs seem to have a low yield of persistent positive BC in uncomplicated GN-BSIs and no effect on mortality, but some selected patients may benefit. Available studies show different results regarding the mortality and benefit of FUBCs, mainly due to differences in methodology and patient characteristics. However, selected patients with endovascular infections, central venous catheters, unfavorable responses, and no source control seem to benefit the most. Randomized controlled trials are warranted in order to confirm these indications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110660/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13050156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13050156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随访血培养(fubc)在革兰氏阴性血流感染(gn - bsi)中的应用仍然存在争议。由于缺乏随机对照试验和指南,导致不适当地使用不必要的fubc,增加了费用、住院时间和抗生素的使用。在这篇综述中,我们的目的是评估在gn - bsi中最重要的fubc研究的优势和局限性,提出一种更个性化的方法来使用fubc在gn - bsi中。在无并发症的gn - bsi中,fubc似乎具有低持续性阳性BC,对死亡率没有影响,但一些选定的患者可能受益。现有的研究显示,由于方法学和患者特征的差异,fubc的死亡率和获益有不同的结果。然而,有血管内感染、中心静脉置管、不良反应和无源头控制的患者似乎受益最多。为了证实这些适应症,有必要进行随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a Personalized Approach to Follow-Up Blood Cultures in Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections: A Narrative Review.

The utility of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) in Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSIs) remains controversial. The lack of randomized controlled trials and guidelines has led to the inappropriate use of unnecessary FUBCs, increasing costs, the length of hospital stays, and antibiotic use. In this review, we aim to evaluate the strengths and limitations of the most significant studies on FUBCs in GN-BSIs, proposing a more personalized approach for using FUBCs in GN-BSIs. FUBCs seem to have a low yield of persistent positive BC in uncomplicated GN-BSIs and no effect on mortality, but some selected patients may benefit. Available studies show different results regarding the mortality and benefit of FUBCs, mainly due to differences in methodology and patient characteristics. However, selected patients with endovascular infections, central venous catheters, unfavorable responses, and no source control seem to benefit the most. Randomized controlled trials are warranted in order to confirm these indications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信