释放学生在传统考试之外的潜能:协作测试对护生记忆和软技能的影响。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Amal Diab Ghanem Atalla, Mohamed Hussein Ramadan Atta, Amina Hemida Salem Ghattas
{"title":"释放学生在传统考试之外的潜能:协作测试对护生记忆和软技能的影响。","authors":"Amal Diab Ghanem Atalla, Mohamed Hussein Ramadan Atta, Amina Hemida Salem Ghattas","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03237-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing is both an art and a science, demanding specific qualities and competencies from students to succeed. These attributes are essential for effective practice and long-term professional growth. If not developed, they may negatively impact patient outcomes and safety, contributing to medical errors, higher mortality rates, and job dissatisfaction.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study examines the impact of collaborative testing on students' retention of emergency nursing concepts and the development of soft skills.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A quasi-experimental research design was employed, adhering to the STROBE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods and tools: </strong>A total of 100 students enrolled in an emergency nursing course participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to either a control group (50 students) or an experimental group (50 students). Data was collected using the Emergency Nursing Academic Achievement Questionnaire and the Collaborative Testing Satisfaction Survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed a significant improvement in the intervention group's post-lecture test scores for tests 2, 3, 4, and 5 (p < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed in the first post-lecture test between the two groups (p = 0.415). Additionally, the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher scores in both the mid-term and final written examinations, indicating enhanced retention of course material (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 84% of students reported high satisfaction, while 14% expressed moderate satisfaction with the collaborative testing experience. They also perceived an improvement in their soft skills, with an overall score of 95.64 ± 4.35.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that engaging students in collaborative testing significantly enhances their retention of emergency nursing concepts compared to individual testing. Moreover, most students found the collaborative experience highly satisfactory, reporting improvements in their comprehension of course material, critical thinking, problem-solving, communication, and engagement, key competencies for nursing professionals. Additionally, students recommended implementing this approach in other courses.</p><p><strong>Nursing implications: </strong>Incorporating collaborative testing into nursing curricula can promote deeper learning and long-term knowledge retention of critical emergency concepts. From a practical standpoint, this model simulates real-world nursing teamwork, allowing students to practice decision-making, communication, and mutual accountability. It can also help reduce test anxiety, encourage peer learning, and better prepare students for interdisciplinary collaboration and emergency response scenarios they will encounter in clinical practice. Nurse educators should consider adopting collaborative assessment strategies as part of a broader pedagogical shift toward active, team-based learning that mirrors the collaborative nature of modern healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"595"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlocking students' potential beyond traditional exams: the influence of collaborative testing on nursing students' retention and soft skills.\",\"authors\":\"Amal Diab Ghanem Atalla, Mohamed Hussein Ramadan Atta, Amina Hemida Salem Ghattas\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12912-025-03237-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing is both an art and a science, demanding specific qualities and competencies from students to succeed. These attributes are essential for effective practice and long-term professional growth. If not developed, they may negatively impact patient outcomes and safety, contributing to medical errors, higher mortality rates, and job dissatisfaction.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study examines the impact of collaborative testing on students' retention of emergency nursing concepts and the development of soft skills.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A quasi-experimental research design was employed, adhering to the STROBE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods and tools: </strong>A total of 100 students enrolled in an emergency nursing course participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to either a control group (50 students) or an experimental group (50 students). Data was collected using the Emergency Nursing Academic Achievement Questionnaire and the Collaborative Testing Satisfaction Survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed a significant improvement in the intervention group's post-lecture test scores for tests 2, 3, 4, and 5 (p < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed in the first post-lecture test between the two groups (p = 0.415). Additionally, the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher scores in both the mid-term and final written examinations, indicating enhanced retention of course material (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 84% of students reported high satisfaction, while 14% expressed moderate satisfaction with the collaborative testing experience. They also perceived an improvement in their soft skills, with an overall score of 95.64 ± 4.35.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that engaging students in collaborative testing significantly enhances their retention of emergency nursing concepts compared to individual testing. Moreover, most students found the collaborative experience highly satisfactory, reporting improvements in their comprehension of course material, critical thinking, problem-solving, communication, and engagement, key competencies for nursing professionals. Additionally, students recommended implementing this approach in other courses.</p><p><strong>Nursing implications: </strong>Incorporating collaborative testing into nursing curricula can promote deeper learning and long-term knowledge retention of critical emergency concepts. From a practical standpoint, this model simulates real-world nursing teamwork, allowing students to practice decision-making, communication, and mutual accountability. It can also help reduce test anxiety, encourage peer learning, and better prepare students for interdisciplinary collaboration and emergency response scenarios they will encounter in clinical practice. Nurse educators should consider adopting collaborative assessment strategies as part of a broader pedagogical shift toward active, team-based learning that mirrors the collaborative nature of modern healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"595\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107850/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03237-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03237-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护理既是一门艺术也是一门科学,需要学生具备特定的素质和能力才能取得成功。这些属性对于有效的实践和长期的专业成长是必不可少的。如果不加以发展,它们可能会对患者的治疗结果和安全产生负面影响,导致医疗差错、更高的死亡率和对工作的不满。目的:探讨合作测验对急诊护理概念记忆及软技能发展的影响。设计:采用准实验研究设计,遵循STROBE指南。方法与工具:共100名急诊护理专业学生参与研究。他们被随机分配到对照组(50名学生)和实验组(50名学生)。采用《急诊护理学业成就问卷》和《协作测试满意度调查》收集数据。结果:研究结果显示,干预组的课后测试2、3、4和5的得分显著提高(p结论:本研究的结果表明,与单独测试相比,让学生参与合作测试显著提高了他们对急诊护理概念的记忆。此外,大多数学生对合作体验非常满意,报告说他们在理解课程材料、批判性思维、解决问题、沟通和参与方面都有提高,这些都是护理专业人员的关键能力。此外,学生建议在其他课程中采用这种方法。护理意义:将协作测试纳入护理课程可以促进对关键急救概念的深入学习和长期知识保留。从实践的角度来看,这个模型模拟了现实世界的护理团队合作,让学生练习决策、沟通和相互问责。它还可以帮助减少考试焦虑,鼓励同侪学习,并更好地为学生在临床实践中遇到的跨学科合作和应急反应情景做好准备。护士教育者应该考虑采用协作评估策略,将其作为更广泛的教学转变的一部分,转向积极的、基于团队的学习,以反映现代医疗保健环境的协作性质。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unlocking students' potential beyond traditional exams: the influence of collaborative testing on nursing students' retention and soft skills.

Background: Nursing is both an art and a science, demanding specific qualities and competencies from students to succeed. These attributes are essential for effective practice and long-term professional growth. If not developed, they may negatively impact patient outcomes and safety, contributing to medical errors, higher mortality rates, and job dissatisfaction.

Aim: This study examines the impact of collaborative testing on students' retention of emergency nursing concepts and the development of soft skills.

Design: A quasi-experimental research design was employed, adhering to the STROBE guidelines.

Methods and tools: A total of 100 students enrolled in an emergency nursing course participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to either a control group (50 students) or an experimental group (50 students). Data was collected using the Emergency Nursing Academic Achievement Questionnaire and the Collaborative Testing Satisfaction Survey.

Results: The findings revealed a significant improvement in the intervention group's post-lecture test scores for tests 2, 3, 4, and 5 (p < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed in the first post-lecture test between the two groups (p = 0.415). Additionally, the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher scores in both the mid-term and final written examinations, indicating enhanced retention of course material (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 84% of students reported high satisfaction, while 14% expressed moderate satisfaction with the collaborative testing experience. They also perceived an improvement in their soft skills, with an overall score of 95.64 ± 4.35.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that engaging students in collaborative testing significantly enhances their retention of emergency nursing concepts compared to individual testing. Moreover, most students found the collaborative experience highly satisfactory, reporting improvements in their comprehension of course material, critical thinking, problem-solving, communication, and engagement, key competencies for nursing professionals. Additionally, students recommended implementing this approach in other courses.

Nursing implications: Incorporating collaborative testing into nursing curricula can promote deeper learning and long-term knowledge retention of critical emergency concepts. From a practical standpoint, this model simulates real-world nursing teamwork, allowing students to practice decision-making, communication, and mutual accountability. It can also help reduce test anxiety, encourage peer learning, and better prepare students for interdisciplinary collaboration and emergency response scenarios they will encounter in clinical practice. Nurse educators should consider adopting collaborative assessment strategies as part of a broader pedagogical shift toward active, team-based learning that mirrors the collaborative nature of modern healthcare settings.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信