国内风险工具:在德尔菲研究的帮助下,优先考虑家庭护理患者的临床药学服务。

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Carla Meyer-Massetti, Stefanie Lettieri-Amstutz, Daniela Rölli, Christoph R Meier
{"title":"国内风险工具:在德尔菲研究的帮助下,优先考虑家庭护理患者的临床药学服务。","authors":"Carla Meyer-Massetti, Stefanie Lettieri-Amstutz, Daniela Rölli, Christoph R Meier","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15050158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Medication-related problems (MRPs) are common among home-care patients urgently needing improvement. Due to limited resources, patients with the greatest risk of MRPs should be prioritised for interventions. <b>Objectives:</b> We sought to develop a collaborative assessment tool for nurses and pharmacists to identify home-care patients at high risk of developing MRPs. <b>Methods:</b> Using Pubmed<sup>®</sup> for a first scoping literature review, we sought existing tools identifying patients at risk of MRPs or prioritising patients for clinical pharmacy services. Extracted items were prioritised in a first interprofessional Delphi round. Results from the first Delphi round were complemented by individual risk factors identified in a second scoping literature review and again submitted to the expert panel in a second Delphi round. Each item was rated for its relevance to identify home-care patients at risk of MRPs. The highest scoring factors were combined into an interprofessional assessment tool. <b>Results:</b> Literature review one yielded 19 risk tools and six lists containing potentially inappropriate medications. The 78 resulting risk factors were submitted to experts (five pharmacists, five physicians, five nurses) in Delphi round one. Since the identified tools did not fit the scope (interprofessional assessment in home care) entirely, the results of Delphi round one were complemented with individual risk factors identified in a second literature review, leading to 82 potential risk factors for Delphi round two. Experts decided on a 15-item tool for future pilot testing-the doMESTIC RISK tool. It incorporated diverse factors potentially influencing medication safety: demographic information, social context, diagnosis, specific medication and health care resources use. <b>Conclusions:</b> With expert feedback from a Delphi process, we developed a 15-item tool to help nurses and pharmacists jointly identify home-care patients at a high risk of MRPs. Validation of the doMESTIC RISK tool will be imperative to verify its value in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12114156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The doMESTIC RISK Tool: Prioritising Home-Care Patients for Clinical Pharmacy Services with the Help of a Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"Carla Meyer-Massetti, Stefanie Lettieri-Amstutz, Daniela Rölli, Christoph R Meier\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15050158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Medication-related problems (MRPs) are common among home-care patients urgently needing improvement. Due to limited resources, patients with the greatest risk of MRPs should be prioritised for interventions. <b>Objectives:</b> We sought to develop a collaborative assessment tool for nurses and pharmacists to identify home-care patients at high risk of developing MRPs. <b>Methods:</b> Using Pubmed<sup>®</sup> for a first scoping literature review, we sought existing tools identifying patients at risk of MRPs or prioritising patients for clinical pharmacy services. Extracted items were prioritised in a first interprofessional Delphi round. Results from the first Delphi round were complemented by individual risk factors identified in a second scoping literature review and again submitted to the expert panel in a second Delphi round. Each item was rated for its relevance to identify home-care patients at risk of MRPs. The highest scoring factors were combined into an interprofessional assessment tool. <b>Results:</b> Literature review one yielded 19 risk tools and six lists containing potentially inappropriate medications. The 78 resulting risk factors were submitted to experts (five pharmacists, five physicians, five nurses) in Delphi round one. Since the identified tools did not fit the scope (interprofessional assessment in home care) entirely, the results of Delphi round one were complemented with individual risk factors identified in a second literature review, leading to 82 potential risk factors for Delphi round two. Experts decided on a 15-item tool for future pilot testing-the doMESTIC RISK tool. It incorporated diverse factors potentially influencing medication safety: demographic information, social context, diagnosis, specific medication and health care resources use. <b>Conclusions:</b> With expert feedback from a Delphi process, we developed a 15-item tool to help nurses and pharmacists jointly identify home-care patients at a high risk of MRPs. Validation of the doMESTIC RISK tool will be imperative to verify its value in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12114156/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15050158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15050158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药物相关问题(MRPs)在家庭护理患者中很常见,急需改善。由于资源有限,mrp风险最大的患者应优先进行干预。目的:我们试图为护士和药剂师开发一种协作评估工具,以识别发生mrp的高风险家庭护理患者。方法:使用Pubmed®进行首次范围文献综述,我们寻找现有的工具来识别mrp风险患者或优先考虑临床药学服务的患者。在第一轮跨专业的德尔菲轮中,提取的项目被优先排序。第一轮德尔菲调查的结果与第二轮文献综述中确定的个别风险因素相补充,并在第二轮德尔菲调查中再次提交给专家组。每个项目都被评估其相关性,以确定家庭护理患者的mrp风险。得分最高的因素被合并到一个跨专业的评估工具中。结果:文献综述1得出19个风险工具和6个包含潜在不适当药物的清单。结果78个危险因素提交给专家(5名药剂师,5名医生,5名护士)在德尔菲第一轮。由于确定的工具不完全适合范围(家庭护理的跨专业评估),第一轮德尔菲的结果与第二篇文献综述中确定的个体风险因素相补充,导致德尔菲第二轮的82个潜在风险因素。专家们为未来的试点测试决定了一个包含15个项目的工具——国内风险工具。它纳入了可能影响用药安全的各种因素:人口统计信息、社会背景、诊断、特定药物和卫生保健资源使用。结论:根据专家的德尔菲法反馈,我们开发了一个包含15个项目的工具,以帮助护士和药剂师共同识别mrp高风险的家庭护理患者。验证国内风险工具将是必要的,以验证其在临床实践中的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The doMESTIC RISK Tool: Prioritising Home-Care Patients for Clinical Pharmacy Services with the Help of a Delphi Study.

Background: Medication-related problems (MRPs) are common among home-care patients urgently needing improvement. Due to limited resources, patients with the greatest risk of MRPs should be prioritised for interventions. Objectives: We sought to develop a collaborative assessment tool for nurses and pharmacists to identify home-care patients at high risk of developing MRPs. Methods: Using Pubmed® for a first scoping literature review, we sought existing tools identifying patients at risk of MRPs or prioritising patients for clinical pharmacy services. Extracted items were prioritised in a first interprofessional Delphi round. Results from the first Delphi round were complemented by individual risk factors identified in a second scoping literature review and again submitted to the expert panel in a second Delphi round. Each item was rated for its relevance to identify home-care patients at risk of MRPs. The highest scoring factors were combined into an interprofessional assessment tool. Results: Literature review one yielded 19 risk tools and six lists containing potentially inappropriate medications. The 78 resulting risk factors were submitted to experts (five pharmacists, five physicians, five nurses) in Delphi round one. Since the identified tools did not fit the scope (interprofessional assessment in home care) entirely, the results of Delphi round one were complemented with individual risk factors identified in a second literature review, leading to 82 potential risk factors for Delphi round two. Experts decided on a 15-item tool for future pilot testing-the doMESTIC RISK tool. It incorporated diverse factors potentially influencing medication safety: demographic information, social context, diagnosis, specific medication and health care resources use. Conclusions: With expert feedback from a Delphi process, we developed a 15-item tool to help nurses and pharmacists jointly identify home-care patients at a high risk of MRPs. Validation of the doMESTIC RISK tool will be imperative to verify its value in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信