在高度专业化的单位调整药物管理错误调查的步骤-波兰的观点。

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Katarzyna Kwiecień-Jaguś, Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Monika Kopeć
{"title":"在高度专业化的单位调整药物管理错误调查的步骤-波兰的观点。","authors":"Katarzyna Kwiecień-Jaguś, Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Monika Kopeć","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15050173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Objectives:</b> Medication errors are a critical issue in healthcare systems worldwide, contributing to significant patient harm, with studies indicating that medication-related incidents are among the most common causes of adverse events in medical practice. There are between 80 and 200 steps in providing a single patient with a single dose of drugs, with five stages, including prescription, preparation, dispensation, administration and monitoring. This study aims to describe and validate the MAEs (Medication Administration Error Scale) tool, which investigates the most common causes of medication errors in medication administration. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Independent translators translated the original version of the scale using language verification. The agreed-upon version of the translation was then assessed by a team of nurses, specialists in anaesthetic and intensive care nursing, in terms of understanding the translated content. After introducing changes resulting from linguistic and organisational differences, a survey questionnaire was prepared and used in the pilot study. Eighty-six respondents participated in the pilot study via the Office 365 platform and the Forms programme. The research was led by nurses who work in highly specialised units. The reliability of the translated version of the questionnaire was examined by calculating the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. <b>Results</b>: The tool's internal consistency across ranges was within acceptable limits. For part A (questions 1-29), it was 0.93; for part B (questions 30-45), it was 0.94. In part C, regarding the percentages of the type of error occurring in a given medical facility, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.97. When the factor loadings of the items were evaluated, they were determined to be in the range of 0.602-0.783. In this context, the factor loading levels of the items in the 5-factor model were high and sufficient. <b>Conclusions:</b> The statistical analyses suggest that the Polish version of the Medication Administration Error Survey demonstrates satisfactory reliability and is a promising tool for assessing the cause of medication administration errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12114384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Steps to Adapt the Medication Administration Error Survey in Highly Specialised Units-Polish Perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna Kwiecień-Jaguś, Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Monika Kopeć\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15050173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and Objectives:</b> Medication errors are a critical issue in healthcare systems worldwide, contributing to significant patient harm, with studies indicating that medication-related incidents are among the most common causes of adverse events in medical practice. There are between 80 and 200 steps in providing a single patient with a single dose of drugs, with five stages, including prescription, preparation, dispensation, administration and monitoring. This study aims to describe and validate the MAEs (Medication Administration Error Scale) tool, which investigates the most common causes of medication errors in medication administration. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Independent translators translated the original version of the scale using language verification. The agreed-upon version of the translation was then assessed by a team of nurses, specialists in anaesthetic and intensive care nursing, in terms of understanding the translated content. After introducing changes resulting from linguistic and organisational differences, a survey questionnaire was prepared and used in the pilot study. Eighty-six respondents participated in the pilot study via the Office 365 platform and the Forms programme. The research was led by nurses who work in highly specialised units. The reliability of the translated version of the questionnaire was examined by calculating the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. <b>Results</b>: The tool's internal consistency across ranges was within acceptable limits. For part A (questions 1-29), it was 0.93; for part B (questions 30-45), it was 0.94. In part C, regarding the percentages of the type of error occurring in a given medical facility, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.97. When the factor loadings of the items were evaluated, they were determined to be in the range of 0.602-0.783. In this context, the factor loading levels of the items in the 5-factor model were high and sufficient. <b>Conclusions:</b> The statistical analyses suggest that the Polish version of the Medication Administration Error Survey demonstrates satisfactory reliability and is a promising tool for assessing the cause of medication administration errors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12114384/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15050173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15050173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:药物错误是全球医疗保健系统中的一个关键问题,对患者造成重大伤害,研究表明,药物相关事件是医疗实践中不良事件最常见的原因之一。为单个患者提供单剂量药物需要80至200个步骤,分为五个阶段,包括处方、制备、配发、给药和监测。本研究旨在描述和验证MAEs(给药错误量表)工具,该工具调查了给药过程中最常见的用药错误原因。材料与方法:独立翻译人员采用语言验证法翻译原版量表。然后由一组护士、麻醉和重症监护专家对商定的翻译版本进行评估,以理解翻译的内容。在引入语言和组织差异导致的变化后,准备了一份调查问卷,并在试点研究中使用。86名受访者通过Office 365平台和Forms程序参与了试点研究。这项研究是由在高度专业化的单位工作的护士领导的。通过计算Cronbach’s alpha系数来检验问卷翻译版本的信度。结果:该工具的内部一致性在可接受范围内。A部分(1-29题)得分为0.93;B部分(30-45题)的得分为0.94。在C部分中,关于在给定医疗机构中发生的错误类型的百分比,Cronbach的alpha系数为0.97。当评估项目的因子负荷时,确定它们在0.602-0.783的范围内。在此背景下,五因子模型中项目的因子负荷水平高且充足。结论:统计分析表明波兰版本的用药差错调查具有令人满意的可靠性,是评估用药差错原因的有希望的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Steps to Adapt the Medication Administration Error Survey in Highly Specialised Units-Polish Perspectives.

Background and Objectives: Medication errors are a critical issue in healthcare systems worldwide, contributing to significant patient harm, with studies indicating that medication-related incidents are among the most common causes of adverse events in medical practice. There are between 80 and 200 steps in providing a single patient with a single dose of drugs, with five stages, including prescription, preparation, dispensation, administration and monitoring. This study aims to describe and validate the MAEs (Medication Administration Error Scale) tool, which investigates the most common causes of medication errors in medication administration. Materials and Methods: Independent translators translated the original version of the scale using language verification. The agreed-upon version of the translation was then assessed by a team of nurses, specialists in anaesthetic and intensive care nursing, in terms of understanding the translated content. After introducing changes resulting from linguistic and organisational differences, a survey questionnaire was prepared and used in the pilot study. Eighty-six respondents participated in the pilot study via the Office 365 platform and the Forms programme. The research was led by nurses who work in highly specialised units. The reliability of the translated version of the questionnaire was examined by calculating the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Results: The tool's internal consistency across ranges was within acceptable limits. For part A (questions 1-29), it was 0.93; for part B (questions 30-45), it was 0.94. In part C, regarding the percentages of the type of error occurring in a given medical facility, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.97. When the factor loadings of the items were evaluated, they were determined to be in the range of 0.602-0.783. In this context, the factor loading levels of the items in the 5-factor model were high and sufficient. Conclusions: The statistical analyses suggest that the Polish version of the Medication Administration Error Survey demonstrates satisfactory reliability and is a promising tool for assessing the cause of medication administration errors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信