本科护理教育中的混合现实:益处和挑战的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Laura Guillen-Aguinaga, Esperanza Rayón-Valpuesta, Sara Guillen-Aguinaga, Blanca Rodriguez-Diaz, Rocio Montejo, Rosa Alas-Brun, Enrique Aguinaga-Ontoso, Luc Onambele, Miriam Guillen-Aguinaga, Francisco Guillen-Grima, Ines Aguinaga-Ontoso
{"title":"本科护理教育中的混合现实:益处和挑战的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Laura Guillen-Aguinaga, Esperanza Rayón-Valpuesta, Sara Guillen-Aguinaga, Blanca Rodriguez-Diaz, Rocio Montejo, Rosa Alas-Brun, Enrique Aguinaga-Ontoso, Luc Onambele, Miriam Guillen-Aguinaga, Francisco Guillen-Grima, Ines Aguinaga-Ontoso","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15050137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Nursing Schools are incorporating Mixed Reality (MR) into student training to enable them to confront challenging or infrequently encountered scenarios in their practice and ensure their preparedness. This systematic review evaluates the benefits and challenges of implementing MR in nursing curricula. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A search was conducted in PubMed, WOS, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL for studies published between 2011 and 2023. The search strategy used was \"(nurses OR nurse OR nursing) AND mixed reality AND simulation\". Inclusion criteria required that studies focus on undergraduate nursing students and be written in English or Spanish. Exclusion criteria included reviews, bibliometric studies, and articles that did not separately report undergraduate nursing student results. Quality was evaluated with the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies with control groups to compare MR's effectiveness against traditional teaching methods. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. MR was widely used to improve clinical judgment, patient safety, technical skill acquisition, and student confidence. The meta-analysis found that MR reduced anxiety (Cohen's d = -0.73, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, its impact on knowledge acquisition and skill development was inconsistent. There was no improvement over traditional methods (<i>p</i> = 0.466 and <i>p</i> = 0.840). Despite positive qualitative findings, methodological variability, small sample sizes, and publication bias contributed to mixed quantitative results. The main challenges were cybersickness, usability, high costs, and limited institutional access to MR technology. <b>Conclusions:</b> Although MR can help nursing education by decreasing students' anxiety, its efficacy remains inconclusive. Future research should use larger, randomized controlled trials to validate MR's role in nursing education.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed Reality in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Benefits and Challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Guillen-Aguinaga, Esperanza Rayón-Valpuesta, Sara Guillen-Aguinaga, Blanca Rodriguez-Diaz, Rocio Montejo, Rosa Alas-Brun, Enrique Aguinaga-Ontoso, Luc Onambele, Miriam Guillen-Aguinaga, Francisco Guillen-Grima, Ines Aguinaga-Ontoso\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15050137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Nursing Schools are incorporating Mixed Reality (MR) into student training to enable them to confront challenging or infrequently encountered scenarios in their practice and ensure their preparedness. This systematic review evaluates the benefits and challenges of implementing MR in nursing curricula. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A search was conducted in PubMed, WOS, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL for studies published between 2011 and 2023. The search strategy used was \\\"(nurses OR nurse OR nursing) AND mixed reality AND simulation\\\". Inclusion criteria required that studies focus on undergraduate nursing students and be written in English or Spanish. Exclusion criteria included reviews, bibliometric studies, and articles that did not separately report undergraduate nursing student results. Quality was evaluated with the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies with control groups to compare MR's effectiveness against traditional teaching methods. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. MR was widely used to improve clinical judgment, patient safety, technical skill acquisition, and student confidence. The meta-analysis found that MR reduced anxiety (Cohen's d = -0.73, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, its impact on knowledge acquisition and skill development was inconsistent. There was no improvement over traditional methods (<i>p</i> = 0.466 and <i>p</i> = 0.840). Despite positive qualitative findings, methodological variability, small sample sizes, and publication bias contributed to mixed quantitative results. The main challenges were cybersickness, usability, high costs, and limited institutional access to MR technology. <b>Conclusions:</b> Although MR can help nursing education by decreasing students' anxiety, its efficacy remains inconclusive. Future research should use larger, randomized controlled trials to validate MR's role in nursing education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113701/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15050137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15050137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护理学校正在将混合现实(MR)纳入学生培训,使他们能够在实践中面对具有挑战性或不常见的场景,并确保他们做好准备。本系统综述评估了在护理课程中实施MR的好处和挑战。材料和方法:在PubMed、WOS、Scopus、Embase和CINAHL中检索2011年至2023年间发表的研究。使用的搜索策略是“(护士或护士或护理)和混合现实和模拟”。纳入标准要求研究以本科护理专业学生为重点,并以英语或西班牙语撰写。排除标准包括综述、文献计量学研究和没有单独报道护理本科生结果的文章。用JBI定性研究关键评价清单和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对质量进行评估。对对照组的研究进行荟萃分析,比较MR与传统教学方法的有效性。结果:33项研究符合纳入标准。磁共振被广泛用于提高临床判断、患者安全、技术技能习得和学生信心。荟萃分析发现MR减少了焦虑(Cohen’s d = -0.73, p < 0.001)。然而,其对知识获取和技能发展的影响并不一致。与传统方法相比无明显改善(p = 0.466、p = 0.840)。尽管定性结果是积极的,但方法的可变性、小样本量和发表偏倚导致了混合的定量结果。主要的挑战是晕动症、可用性、高成本和机构对MR技术的有限获取。结论:磁共振可通过降低学生的焦虑感来帮助护理教育,但其效果尚不明确。未来的研究应采用更大规模的随机对照试验来验证MR在护理教育中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mixed Reality in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Benefits and Challenges.

Background: Nursing Schools are incorporating Mixed Reality (MR) into student training to enable them to confront challenging or infrequently encountered scenarios in their practice and ensure their preparedness. This systematic review evaluates the benefits and challenges of implementing MR in nursing curricula. Materials and Methods: A search was conducted in PubMed, WOS, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL for studies published between 2011 and 2023. The search strategy used was "(nurses OR nurse OR nursing) AND mixed reality AND simulation". Inclusion criteria required that studies focus on undergraduate nursing students and be written in English or Spanish. Exclusion criteria included reviews, bibliometric studies, and articles that did not separately report undergraduate nursing student results. Quality was evaluated with the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies with control groups to compare MR's effectiveness against traditional teaching methods. Results: Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. MR was widely used to improve clinical judgment, patient safety, technical skill acquisition, and student confidence. The meta-analysis found that MR reduced anxiety (Cohen's d = -0.73, p < 0.001). However, its impact on knowledge acquisition and skill development was inconsistent. There was no improvement over traditional methods (p = 0.466 and p = 0.840). Despite positive qualitative findings, methodological variability, small sample sizes, and publication bias contributed to mixed quantitative results. The main challenges were cybersickness, usability, high costs, and limited institutional access to MR technology. Conclusions: Although MR can help nursing education by decreasing students' anxiety, its efficacy remains inconclusive. Future research should use larger, randomized controlled trials to validate MR's role in nursing education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信