医学生人工智能的新型混合学习:质性访谈研究。

IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Zoe S Oftring, Kim Deutsch, Daniel Tolks, Florian Jungmann, Sebastian Kuhn
{"title":"医学生人工智能的新型混合学习:质性访谈研究。","authors":"Zoe S Oftring, Kim Deutsch, Daniel Tolks, Florian Jungmann, Sebastian Kuhn","doi":"10.2196/65220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are becoming increasingly relevant in everyday clinical practice, with Food and Drug Administration-approved AI solutions now available in many specialties. This development has far-reaching implications for doctors and the future medical profession, highlighting the need for both practicing physicians and medical students to acquire the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to effectively use and evaluate these technologies. Currently, however, there is limited experience with AI-focused curricular training and continuing education.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper first introduces a novel blended learning curriculum including one module on AI for medical students in Germany. Second, this paper presents findings from a qualitative postcourse evaluation of students' knowledge and attitudes toward AI and their overall perception of the course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical-year medical students can attend a 5-day elective course called \"Medicine in the Digital Age,\" which includes one dedicated AI module alongside 4 others on digital doctor-patient communication; digital health applications and smart devices; telemedicine; and virtual/augmented reality and robotics. After course completion, participants were interviewed in semistructured small group interviews. The interview guide was developed deductively from existing evidence and research questions compiled by our group. A subset of interview questions focused on students' knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding medical AI, and their overall course assessment. Responses were analyzed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis. This paper reports on the subset of students' statements about their perception and attitudes toward AI and the elective's general evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted a total of 18 group interviews, in which all 35 (100%) participants (female=11, male=24) from 3 consecutive course runs participated. This produced a total of 214 statements on AI, which were assigned to the 3 main categories \"Areas of Application,\" \"Future Work,\" and \"Critical Reflection.\" The findings indicate that students have a nuanced and differentiated understanding of AI. Additionally, 610 statements concerned the elective's overall assessment, demonstrating great learning benefits and high levels of acceptance of the teaching concept. All 35 students would recommend the elective to peers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evaluation demonstrated that the AI module effectively generates competences regarding AI technology, fosters a critical perspective, and prepares medical students to engage with the technology in a differentiated manner. The curriculum is feasible, beneficial, and highly accepted among students, suggesting it could serve as a teaching model for other medical institutions. Given the growing number and impact of medical AI applications, there is a pressing need for more AI-focused curricula and further research on their educational impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"11 ","pages":"e65220"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Blended Learning on Artificial Intelligence for Medical Students: Qualitative Interview Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zoe S Oftring, Kim Deutsch, Daniel Tolks, Florian Jungmann, Sebastian Kuhn\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/65220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are becoming increasingly relevant in everyday clinical practice, with Food and Drug Administration-approved AI solutions now available in many specialties. This development has far-reaching implications for doctors and the future medical profession, highlighting the need for both practicing physicians and medical students to acquire the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to effectively use and evaluate these technologies. Currently, however, there is limited experience with AI-focused curricular training and continuing education.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper first introduces a novel blended learning curriculum including one module on AI for medical students in Germany. Second, this paper presents findings from a qualitative postcourse evaluation of students' knowledge and attitudes toward AI and their overall perception of the course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical-year medical students can attend a 5-day elective course called \\\"Medicine in the Digital Age,\\\" which includes one dedicated AI module alongside 4 others on digital doctor-patient communication; digital health applications and smart devices; telemedicine; and virtual/augmented reality and robotics. After course completion, participants were interviewed in semistructured small group interviews. The interview guide was developed deductively from existing evidence and research questions compiled by our group. A subset of interview questions focused on students' knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding medical AI, and their overall course assessment. Responses were analyzed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis. This paper reports on the subset of students' statements about their perception and attitudes toward AI and the elective's general evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted a total of 18 group interviews, in which all 35 (100%) participants (female=11, male=24) from 3 consecutive course runs participated. This produced a total of 214 statements on AI, which were assigned to the 3 main categories \\\"Areas of Application,\\\" \\\"Future Work,\\\" and \\\"Critical Reflection.\\\" The findings indicate that students have a nuanced and differentiated understanding of AI. Additionally, 610 statements concerned the elective's overall assessment, demonstrating great learning benefits and high levels of acceptance of the teaching concept. All 35 students would recommend the elective to peers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evaluation demonstrated that the AI module effectively generates competences regarding AI technology, fosters a critical perspective, and prepares medical students to engage with the technology in a differentiated manner. The curriculum is feasible, beneficial, and highly accepted among students, suggesting it could serve as a teaching model for other medical institutions. Given the growing number and impact of medical AI applications, there is a pressing need for more AI-focused curricula and further research on their educational impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e65220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/65220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人工智能(AI)系统在日常临床实践中变得越来越重要,食品和药物管理局(fda)批准的人工智能解决方案现在可用于许多专业。这一发展对医生和未来的医学职业具有深远的影响,突出表明执业医生和医学生都需要获得有效使用和评估这些技术所需的知识、技能和态度。然而,目前以人工智能为重点的课程培训和继续教育的经验有限。目的:本文首先介绍了一种新型的混合学习课程,其中包括德国医学生的人工智能模块。其次,本文介绍了对学生对人工智能的知识和态度以及他们对课程的总体看法的定性课后评估的结果。方法:临床年级的医学生可以参加一个为期5天的选修课程,名为“数字时代的医学”,其中包括一个专门的人工智能模块和其他4个关于数字医患沟通的模块;数字健康应用和智能设备;远程医疗;以及虚拟/增强现实和机器人技术。课程结束后,参与者在半结构化的小组访谈中接受采访。访谈指南是我们小组从现有证据和研究问题中推导出来的。访谈问题的子集侧重于学生对医疗人工智能的知识、技能和态度,以及他们的整体课程评估。采用Mayring的定性内容分析法对回复进行分析。本文报告了学生关于他们对人工智能的看法和态度的陈述子集以及选修课的总体评价。结果:我们共进行了18次小组访谈,连续3次课程的35名参与者(100%)(女性11人,男性24人)全部参与。总共产生了214个关于人工智能的陈述,这些陈述被划分为“应用领域”、“未来工作”和“关键反思”三个主要类别。研究结果表明,学生对人工智能的理解有细微差别。此外,610个陈述涉及选修课的总体评估,显示出巨大的学习效益和对教学理念的高度接受。所有35名学生都会向同龄人推荐这门选修课。结论:评估表明,人工智能模块有效地培养了与人工智能技术相关的能力,培养了批判性视角,并为医学生以差异化的方式参与该技术做好了准备。课程设置可行、有益,学生接受度高,可作为其他医疗机构的教学模式。鉴于医疗人工智能应用的数量和影响不断增长,迫切需要更多以人工智能为重点的课程,并进一步研究其教育影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel Blended Learning on Artificial Intelligence for Medical Students: Qualitative Interview Study.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are becoming increasingly relevant in everyday clinical practice, with Food and Drug Administration-approved AI solutions now available in many specialties. This development has far-reaching implications for doctors and the future medical profession, highlighting the need for both practicing physicians and medical students to acquire the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to effectively use and evaluate these technologies. Currently, however, there is limited experience with AI-focused curricular training and continuing education.

Objective: This paper first introduces a novel blended learning curriculum including one module on AI for medical students in Germany. Second, this paper presents findings from a qualitative postcourse evaluation of students' knowledge and attitudes toward AI and their overall perception of the course.

Methods: Clinical-year medical students can attend a 5-day elective course called "Medicine in the Digital Age," which includes one dedicated AI module alongside 4 others on digital doctor-patient communication; digital health applications and smart devices; telemedicine; and virtual/augmented reality and robotics. After course completion, participants were interviewed in semistructured small group interviews. The interview guide was developed deductively from existing evidence and research questions compiled by our group. A subset of interview questions focused on students' knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding medical AI, and their overall course assessment. Responses were analyzed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis. This paper reports on the subset of students' statements about their perception and attitudes toward AI and the elective's general evaluation.

Results: We conducted a total of 18 group interviews, in which all 35 (100%) participants (female=11, male=24) from 3 consecutive course runs participated. This produced a total of 214 statements on AI, which were assigned to the 3 main categories "Areas of Application," "Future Work," and "Critical Reflection." The findings indicate that students have a nuanced and differentiated understanding of AI. Additionally, 610 statements concerned the elective's overall assessment, demonstrating great learning benefits and high levels of acceptance of the teaching concept. All 35 students would recommend the elective to peers.

Conclusions: The evaluation demonstrated that the AI module effectively generates competences regarding AI technology, fosters a critical perspective, and prepares medical students to engage with the technology in a differentiated manner. The curriculum is feasible, beneficial, and highly accepted among students, suggesting it could serve as a teaching model for other medical institutions. Given the growing number and impact of medical AI applications, there is a pressing need for more AI-focused curricula and further research on their educational impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Education
JMIR Medical Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信