蜂毒针刺治疗踝关节疼痛的临床证据:临床研究综述。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Toxins Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI:10.3390/toxins17050257
Soo-Hyun Sung, Hyein Jeong, Jong-Hyun Park, Minjung Park, Gihyun Lee
{"title":"蜂毒针刺治疗踝关节疼痛的临床证据:临床研究综述。","authors":"Soo-Hyun Sung, Hyein Jeong, Jong-Hyun Park, Minjung Park, Gihyun Lee","doi":"10.3390/toxins17050257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prevalence of ankle pain in adults is 9-15%, with up to 45% of sports-related injuries attributed to ankle pain and injuries. If ankle pain is not controlled in a timely manner, it can lead to ankle instability, resulting in further damage, recurrence of pain, and secondary injuries. The present study aimed to assess the therapeutic potential and safety profile of bee venom acupuncture (BVA) in the management of ankle pain. Ten electronic databases were searched for articles published up to March 2025. We included clinical studies that utilized BVA for the treatment of ankle pain and studies that included pain- and function-related assessment tools. The safety of bee venom acupuncture (BVA) was assessed by extracting adverse events from the included studies and categorizing them according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). A total of 14 clinical studies were selected, of which 9 were case reports, 2 were case-controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and 3 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The conditions causing ankle pain were mostly traumatic (42.9%), followed by inflammatory (21.4%) and neuropathic disorders (14.3%). BVA was applied at concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 0.5 mg/mL, with a per-session volume ranging from 0.04 to 2.5 mL. In most studies, BVA was reported to improve both ankle pain and function simultaneously. Among the 14 studies, four participants reported adverse events following BVA treatment, all of which were classified as grade 1 or grade 2, indicating mild to moderate severity. This review suggests that BVA may be recommended for controlling ankle pain based on clinical evidence. However, the number of high-quality RCTs is limited, and half of the studies did not report side effects, indicating the need for further clinical research to verify its safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23119,"journal":{"name":"Toxins","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Evidence of Bee Venom Acupuncture for Ankle Pain: A Review of Clinical Research.\",\"authors\":\"Soo-Hyun Sung, Hyein Jeong, Jong-Hyun Park, Minjung Park, Gihyun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/toxins17050257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The prevalence of ankle pain in adults is 9-15%, with up to 45% of sports-related injuries attributed to ankle pain and injuries. If ankle pain is not controlled in a timely manner, it can lead to ankle instability, resulting in further damage, recurrence of pain, and secondary injuries. The present study aimed to assess the therapeutic potential and safety profile of bee venom acupuncture (BVA) in the management of ankle pain. Ten electronic databases were searched for articles published up to March 2025. We included clinical studies that utilized BVA for the treatment of ankle pain and studies that included pain- and function-related assessment tools. The safety of bee venom acupuncture (BVA) was assessed by extracting adverse events from the included studies and categorizing them according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). A total of 14 clinical studies were selected, of which 9 were case reports, 2 were case-controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and 3 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The conditions causing ankle pain were mostly traumatic (42.9%), followed by inflammatory (21.4%) and neuropathic disorders (14.3%). BVA was applied at concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 0.5 mg/mL, with a per-session volume ranging from 0.04 to 2.5 mL. In most studies, BVA was reported to improve both ankle pain and function simultaneously. Among the 14 studies, four participants reported adverse events following BVA treatment, all of which were classified as grade 1 or grade 2, indicating mild to moderate severity. This review suggests that BVA may be recommended for controlling ankle pain based on clinical evidence. However, the number of high-quality RCTs is limited, and half of the studies did not report side effects, indicating the need for further clinical research to verify its safety and efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxins\",\"volume\":\"17 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115534/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxins\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17050257\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxins","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17050257","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

成人踝关节疼痛的患病率为9-15%,高达45%的运动相关损伤归因于踝关节疼痛和损伤。如果不及时控制踝关节疼痛,会导致踝关节不稳定,导致进一步损伤,疼痛复发,继发性损伤。本研究旨在评估蜂毒针灸(BVA)治疗踝关节疼痛的治疗潜力和安全性。在10个电子数据库中检索了截至2025年3月发表的文章。我们纳入了利用BVA治疗踝关节疼痛的临床研究,以及包括疼痛和功能相关评估工具的研究。通过从纳入的研究中提取不良事件,并根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)对其进行分类,评估蜂毒针灸(BVA)的安全性。共纳入14项临床研究,其中病例报告9项,病例对照临床试验(CCTs) 2项,随机对照试验(RCTs) 3项。造成踝关节疼痛的主要原因是外伤性(42.9%),其次是炎症(21.4%)和神经性疾病(14.3%)。BVA的应用浓度范围为0.05至0.5 mg/mL,每次用量范围为0.04至2.5 mL。在大多数研究中,BVA被报道可以同时改善脚踝疼痛和功能。在14项研究中,有4名参与者报告了BVA治疗后的不良事件,这些不良事件均被分类为1级或2级,表明严重程度为轻度至中度。这篇综述建议基于临床证据推荐BVA用于控制踝关节疼痛。然而,高质量的rct数量有限,一半的研究未报告副作用,需要进一步的临床研究来验证其安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Evidence of Bee Venom Acupuncture for Ankle Pain: A Review of Clinical Research.

The prevalence of ankle pain in adults is 9-15%, with up to 45% of sports-related injuries attributed to ankle pain and injuries. If ankle pain is not controlled in a timely manner, it can lead to ankle instability, resulting in further damage, recurrence of pain, and secondary injuries. The present study aimed to assess the therapeutic potential and safety profile of bee venom acupuncture (BVA) in the management of ankle pain. Ten electronic databases were searched for articles published up to March 2025. We included clinical studies that utilized BVA for the treatment of ankle pain and studies that included pain- and function-related assessment tools. The safety of bee venom acupuncture (BVA) was assessed by extracting adverse events from the included studies and categorizing them according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). A total of 14 clinical studies were selected, of which 9 were case reports, 2 were case-controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and 3 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The conditions causing ankle pain were mostly traumatic (42.9%), followed by inflammatory (21.4%) and neuropathic disorders (14.3%). BVA was applied at concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 0.5 mg/mL, with a per-session volume ranging from 0.04 to 2.5 mL. In most studies, BVA was reported to improve both ankle pain and function simultaneously. Among the 14 studies, four participants reported adverse events following BVA treatment, all of which were classified as grade 1 or grade 2, indicating mild to moderate severity. This review suggests that BVA may be recommended for controlling ankle pain based on clinical evidence. However, the number of high-quality RCTs is limited, and half of the studies did not report side effects, indicating the need for further clinical research to verify its safety and efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxins
Toxins TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
765
审稿时长
16.24 days
期刊介绍: Toxins (ISSN 2072-6651) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to toxins and toxinology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信