学习阅读视觉盲文如何利用阅读大脑。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Filippo Cerpelloni, Alice Van Audenhaege, Jacek Matuszewski, Remi Gau, Ceren Battal, Federica Falagiarda, Hans Op de Beeck, Olivier Collignon
{"title":"学习阅读视觉盲文如何利用阅读大脑。","authors":"Filippo Cerpelloni, Alice Van Audenhaege, Jacek Matuszewski, Remi Gau, Ceren Battal, Federica Falagiarda, Hans Op de Beeck, Olivier Collignon","doi":"10.1162/jocn_a_02341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Learning to read assigns linguistic value to an abstract visual code. Whether regions of the reading network tune to visual properties common to most scripts or code for more abstracted units of language remains debated. Here, we investigate this question using visual Braille, a script developed for touch that does not share the typical explicit shape information of other alphabets, yet maps onto the same phonology and lexicon as other more regular scripts. First, we compared univariate responses in visual Braille readers and a naïve control group and found that individually localized visual word form area (VWFA) was selectively activated for visual Braille when compared with scrambled Braille only in expert Braille readers. Multivariate analyses showed that linguistic properties can be decoded from Latin script in both groups and from Braille script in expert readers in an extended network of brain regions including the early visual cortex (V1), the lateral occipital (LO) region, the VWFA, and the left posterior temporal (l-PosTemp) area. These results suggest that the tuning of an extended reading network to orthography relies more on the linguistic content of the script rather than their specific visual features (e.g., line junctions). Nevertheless, cross-scripts generalization was significantly lower than within-script decoding and failed to reveal common representations across Latin and Braille in experts in all regions except the l-PosTemp. These results suggest that V1, LO, and VWFA encode orthographic representations in a script-specific manner, whereas l-PosTemp encodes abstracted linguistic information.</p>","PeriodicalId":51081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Learning to Read Visual Braille Co-opts the Reading Brain.\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Cerpelloni, Alice Van Audenhaege, Jacek Matuszewski, Remi Gau, Ceren Battal, Federica Falagiarda, Hans Op de Beeck, Olivier Collignon\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/jocn_a_02341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Learning to read assigns linguistic value to an abstract visual code. Whether regions of the reading network tune to visual properties common to most scripts or code for more abstracted units of language remains debated. Here, we investigate this question using visual Braille, a script developed for touch that does not share the typical explicit shape information of other alphabets, yet maps onto the same phonology and lexicon as other more regular scripts. First, we compared univariate responses in visual Braille readers and a naïve control group and found that individually localized visual word form area (VWFA) was selectively activated for visual Braille when compared with scrambled Braille only in expert Braille readers. Multivariate analyses showed that linguistic properties can be decoded from Latin script in both groups and from Braille script in expert readers in an extended network of brain regions including the early visual cortex (V1), the lateral occipital (LO) region, the VWFA, and the left posterior temporal (l-PosTemp) area. These results suggest that the tuning of an extended reading network to orthography relies more on the linguistic content of the script rather than their specific visual features (e.g., line junctions). Nevertheless, cross-scripts generalization was significantly lower than within-script decoding and failed to reveal common representations across Latin and Braille in experts in all regions except the l-PosTemp. These results suggest that V1, LO, and VWFA encode orthographic representations in a script-specific manner, whereas l-PosTemp encodes abstracted linguistic information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02341\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学习阅读赋予抽象的视觉代码以语言价值。阅读网络的各个区域是适应大多数文字的共同视觉属性,还是适应更抽象的语言单元的代码,目前仍有争议。在这里,我们使用视觉盲文来研究这个问题,这是一种为触摸而开发的文字,它不共享其他字母的典型明确形状信息,但与其他更规则的文字具有相同的音韵和词汇。首先,我们比较了视觉盲文读者和naïve对照组的单变量反应,发现视觉盲文的单独定位视觉词形式区(VWFA)被选择性地激活,而盲文专家读者则被选择性地激活。多变量分析表明,语言特性可以在包括早期视觉皮层(V1)、枕侧区(LO)、VWFA和左后颞区(l-PosTemp)在内的大脑区域扩展网络中从两组的拉丁文字和专家读者的盲文文字中解码。这些结果表明,扩展阅读网络对正字法的调整更多地依赖于文字的语言内容,而不是它们特定的视觉特征(例如,线条连接)。然而,除l-PosTemp外,所有地区的专家的跨文字概括率明显低于文字内解码,并且未能揭示跨拉丁和盲文的共同表征。这些结果表明,V1、LO和VWFA以特定于脚本的方式编码正字法表示,而l-PosTemp编码抽象的语言信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Learning to Read Visual Braille Co-opts the Reading Brain.

Learning to read assigns linguistic value to an abstract visual code. Whether regions of the reading network tune to visual properties common to most scripts or code for more abstracted units of language remains debated. Here, we investigate this question using visual Braille, a script developed for touch that does not share the typical explicit shape information of other alphabets, yet maps onto the same phonology and lexicon as other more regular scripts. First, we compared univariate responses in visual Braille readers and a naïve control group and found that individually localized visual word form area (VWFA) was selectively activated for visual Braille when compared with scrambled Braille only in expert Braille readers. Multivariate analyses showed that linguistic properties can be decoded from Latin script in both groups and from Braille script in expert readers in an extended network of brain regions including the early visual cortex (V1), the lateral occipital (LO) region, the VWFA, and the left posterior temporal (l-PosTemp) area. These results suggest that the tuning of an extended reading network to orthography relies more on the linguistic content of the script rather than their specific visual features (e.g., line junctions). Nevertheless, cross-scripts generalization was significantly lower than within-script decoding and failed to reveal common representations across Latin and Braille in experts in all regions except the l-PosTemp. These results suggest that V1, LO, and VWFA encode orthographic representations in a script-specific manner, whereas l-PosTemp encodes abstracted linguistic information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
151
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience investigates brain–behavior interaction and promotes lively interchange among the mind sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信