血液恶性肿瘤检测的进展:方法和新趋势的综合调查。

Q2 Environmental Science
The Scientific World Journal Pub Date : 2025-05-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/tswj/1671766
Rajashree Nambiar, Ranjith Bhat, Balachandra Achar H V
{"title":"血液恶性肿瘤检测的进展:方法和新趋势的综合调查。","authors":"Rajashree Nambiar, Ranjith Bhat, Balachandra Achar H V","doi":"10.1155/tswj/1671766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The investigation and diagnosis of hematologic malignancy using blood cell image analysis are major and emerging subjects that lie at the intersection of artificial intelligence and medical research. This survey systematically examines the state-of-the-art in blood cancer detection through image-based analysis, aimed at identifying the most effective computational strategies and highlighting emerging trends. This review focuses on three principal objectives, namely, to categorize and compare traditional machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and hybrid learning approaches; to evaluate performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and area under the ROC curve; and to identify methodological gaps and propose directions for future research. Methodologically, we organize the literature by categorizing the malignancy types-leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma-and particularizing the preprocessing steps, feature extraction techniques, network architectures, and ensemble strategies employed. For ML methods, we discuss classical classifiers including support vector machines and random forests; for DL, we analyze convolutional neural networks (e.g., AlexNet, VGG, and ResNet) and transformer-based models; and for hybrid systems, we examine combinations of CNNs with attention mechanisms or traditional classifiers. Our synthesis reveals that DL models consistently outperform ML baselines, achieving classification accuracies above 95% in benchmark datasets, with hybrid models pushing peak accuracy to 99.7%. However, challenges remain in data scarcity, class imbalance, and generalizability to clinical settings. We conclude by recommending the integration of multimodal data, semisupervised learning, and rigorous external validation to advance toward deployable diagnostic tools. This survey also provides a comprehensive roadmap for researchers and clinicians striving to harness AI for reliable hematologic cancer detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":22985,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific World Journal","volume":"2025 ","pages":"1671766"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancements in Hematologic Malignancy Detection: A Comprehensive Survey of Methodologies and Emerging Trends.\",\"authors\":\"Rajashree Nambiar, Ranjith Bhat, Balachandra Achar H V\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/tswj/1671766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The investigation and diagnosis of hematologic malignancy using blood cell image analysis are major and emerging subjects that lie at the intersection of artificial intelligence and medical research. This survey systematically examines the state-of-the-art in blood cancer detection through image-based analysis, aimed at identifying the most effective computational strategies and highlighting emerging trends. This review focuses on three principal objectives, namely, to categorize and compare traditional machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and hybrid learning approaches; to evaluate performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and area under the ROC curve; and to identify methodological gaps and propose directions for future research. Methodologically, we organize the literature by categorizing the malignancy types-leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma-and particularizing the preprocessing steps, feature extraction techniques, network architectures, and ensemble strategies employed. For ML methods, we discuss classical classifiers including support vector machines and random forests; for DL, we analyze convolutional neural networks (e.g., AlexNet, VGG, and ResNet) and transformer-based models; and for hybrid systems, we examine combinations of CNNs with attention mechanisms or traditional classifiers. Our synthesis reveals that DL models consistently outperform ML baselines, achieving classification accuracies above 95% in benchmark datasets, with hybrid models pushing peak accuracy to 99.7%. However, challenges remain in data scarcity, class imbalance, and generalizability to clinical settings. We conclude by recommending the integration of multimodal data, semisupervised learning, and rigorous external validation to advance toward deployable diagnostic tools. This survey also provides a comprehensive roadmap for researchers and clinicians striving to harness AI for reliable hematologic cancer detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Scientific World Journal\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"1671766\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103971/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Scientific World Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/tswj/1671766\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific World Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/tswj/1671766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用血细胞图像分析对血液恶性肿瘤进行调查和诊断是人工智能与医学研究交叉的重要新兴课题。本调查通过基于图像的分析系统地检查了血癌检测的最新技术,旨在确定最有效的计算策略并突出新兴趋势。本文主要关注三个主要目标,即对传统机器学习(ML)、深度学习(DL)和混合学习方法进行分类和比较;评估准确度、精密度、召回率和ROC曲线下面积等性能指标;并找出方法上的差距,为未来的研究提出方向。在方法上,我们通过对恶性肿瘤类型(白血病、淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤)进行分类,并细化预处理步骤、特征提取技术、网络架构和所采用的集成策略来组织文献。对于机器学习方法,我们讨论了经典分类器,包括支持向量机和随机森林;对于深度学习,我们分析卷积神经网络(例如AlexNet、VGG和ResNet)和基于变压器的模型;对于混合系统,我们研究了cnn与注意机制或传统分类器的组合。我们的综合表明,深度学习模型始终优于ML基线,在基准数据集中实现95%以上的分类准确率,混合模型将峰值准确率提高到99.7%。然而,挑战仍然存在于数据稀缺、类别不平衡和临床设置的普遍性。最后,我们建议集成多模态数据、半监督学习和严格的外部验证,以推进可部署的诊断工具。这项调查还为研究人员和临床医生提供了一个全面的路线图,努力利用人工智能进行可靠的血液学癌症检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancements in Hematologic Malignancy Detection: A Comprehensive Survey of Methodologies and Emerging Trends.

The investigation and diagnosis of hematologic malignancy using blood cell image analysis are major and emerging subjects that lie at the intersection of artificial intelligence and medical research. This survey systematically examines the state-of-the-art in blood cancer detection through image-based analysis, aimed at identifying the most effective computational strategies and highlighting emerging trends. This review focuses on three principal objectives, namely, to categorize and compare traditional machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and hybrid learning approaches; to evaluate performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and area under the ROC curve; and to identify methodological gaps and propose directions for future research. Methodologically, we organize the literature by categorizing the malignancy types-leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma-and particularizing the preprocessing steps, feature extraction techniques, network architectures, and ensemble strategies employed. For ML methods, we discuss classical classifiers including support vector machines and random forests; for DL, we analyze convolutional neural networks (e.g., AlexNet, VGG, and ResNet) and transformer-based models; and for hybrid systems, we examine combinations of CNNs with attention mechanisms or traditional classifiers. Our synthesis reveals that DL models consistently outperform ML baselines, achieving classification accuracies above 95% in benchmark datasets, with hybrid models pushing peak accuracy to 99.7%. However, challenges remain in data scarcity, class imbalance, and generalizability to clinical settings. We conclude by recommending the integration of multimodal data, semisupervised learning, and rigorous external validation to advance toward deployable diagnostic tools. This survey also provides a comprehensive roadmap for researchers and clinicians striving to harness AI for reliable hematologic cancer detection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Scientific World Journal
The Scientific World Journal 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: The Scientific World Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research, reviews, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in science, technology, and medicine. The journal is divided into 81 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信