流产非整倍体检测的全基因组无细胞DNA分析:测试性能荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-05-27 DOI:10.1002/pd.6824
Montse Pauta, Raigam J Martinez-Portilla, Ana Cecilia Jara-Ettinger, Victoria Ardiles-Ruesjas, Antoni Borrell
{"title":"流产非整倍体检测的全基因组无细胞DNA分析:测试性能荟萃分析。","authors":"Montse Pauta, Raigam J Martinez-Portilla, Ana Cecilia Jara-Ettinger, Victoria Ardiles-Ruesjas, Antoni Borrell","doi":"10.1002/pd.6824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published series examining the efficacy of genome-wide cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing in identifying aneuploidy in pregnancies ending in miscarriage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted encompassing observational studies evaluating aneuploidy detection by genome-wide cfDNA testing in pregnancy losses before 22 weeks of gestation. A hierarchical summary receiver operating curve was employed to assess pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of genome-wide cfDNA versus genetic diagnostic studies in the detection of aneuploidy. Pooled aneuploidy rate, rate of no-calls, and concordance between cfDNA and diagnostic studies were analyzed using a single proportion meta-analysis based on the inverse of the variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 25 eligible series, eight studies were included for analysis, comprising 552 miscarriages with informative results for both cfDNA and diagnostic testing. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 78% (95% CI: 71%-83%), 91% (95% CI: 86%-95%), and 92%, respectively. Pooled aneuploidy rate, the proportion of no-calls, and concordance were 61% (95% CI: 53%-69%), 4% (95% CI: 0%-12%), and 84% (95% CI: 81%-87%), respectively. In cases of positive cfDNA results, the risk of aneuploidy increased to 93%, whereas negative results yielded a 28% risk of aneuploidy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>cfDNA testing demonstrates acceptable accuracy in predicting fetal aneuploidy when employed as a screening test in miscarriages. The main advantage of cfDNA testing is that it does not require the availability of products of conception or prior chorionic villi sampling.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genome-Wide Cell-Free DNA Analysis for Aneuploidy Detection in Miscarriages: Test Performance Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Montse Pauta, Raigam J Martinez-Portilla, Ana Cecilia Jara-Ettinger, Victoria Ardiles-Ruesjas, Antoni Borrell\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pd.6824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published series examining the efficacy of genome-wide cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing in identifying aneuploidy in pregnancies ending in miscarriage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted encompassing observational studies evaluating aneuploidy detection by genome-wide cfDNA testing in pregnancy losses before 22 weeks of gestation. A hierarchical summary receiver operating curve was employed to assess pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of genome-wide cfDNA versus genetic diagnostic studies in the detection of aneuploidy. Pooled aneuploidy rate, rate of no-calls, and concordance between cfDNA and diagnostic studies were analyzed using a single proportion meta-analysis based on the inverse of the variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 25 eligible series, eight studies were included for analysis, comprising 552 miscarriages with informative results for both cfDNA and diagnostic testing. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 78% (95% CI: 71%-83%), 91% (95% CI: 86%-95%), and 92%, respectively. Pooled aneuploidy rate, the proportion of no-calls, and concordance were 61% (95% CI: 53%-69%), 4% (95% CI: 0%-12%), and 84% (95% CI: 81%-87%), respectively. In cases of positive cfDNA results, the risk of aneuploidy increased to 93%, whereas negative results yielded a 28% risk of aneuploidy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>cfDNA testing demonstrates acceptable accuracy in predicting fetal aneuploidy when employed as a screening test in miscarriages. The main advantage of cfDNA testing is that it does not require the availability of products of conception or prior chorionic villi sampling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prenatal Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prenatal Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6824\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6824","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对已发表的系列研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,研究全基因组无细胞DNA (cfDNA)检测在鉴定流产妊娠非整倍体中的有效性。方法:对观察性研究进行系统回顾,评估全基因组cfDNA检测在妊娠22周前妊娠丢失中的非整倍体检测。采用分层汇总接收者工作曲线来评估全基因组cfDNA与遗传诊断研究在检测非整倍体方面的敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。汇总非整倍体率、无呼叫率以及cfDNA与诊断研究之间的一致性使用基于方差逆的单比例荟萃分析进行分析。结果:在25个符合条件的系列中,8个研究纳入分析,包括552例流产,cfDNA和诊断测试的结果都很翔实。合并敏感性、特异性和AUC分别为78% (95% CI: 71%-83%)、91% (95% CI: 86%-95%)和92%。汇总非整倍性率为61% (95% CI: 53% ~ 69%),无召唤比例为4% (95% CI: 0% ~ 12%),一致性为84% (95% CI: 81% ~ 87%)。在cfDNA结果阳性的情况下,非整倍体的风险增加到93%,而阴性结果产生非整倍体的风险为28%。结论:cfDNA检测在预测胎儿非整倍体时具有可接受的准确性,可作为流产的筛查试验。cfDNA检测的主要优点是它不需要怀孕产品的可用性或事先的绒毛膜绒毛取样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genome-Wide Cell-Free DNA Analysis for Aneuploidy Detection in Miscarriages: Test Performance Meta-Analysis.

Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published series examining the efficacy of genome-wide cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing in identifying aneuploidy in pregnancies ending in miscarriage.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted encompassing observational studies evaluating aneuploidy detection by genome-wide cfDNA testing in pregnancy losses before 22 weeks of gestation. A hierarchical summary receiver operating curve was employed to assess pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of genome-wide cfDNA versus genetic diagnostic studies in the detection of aneuploidy. Pooled aneuploidy rate, rate of no-calls, and concordance between cfDNA and diagnostic studies were analyzed using a single proportion meta-analysis based on the inverse of the variance.

Results: Out of 25 eligible series, eight studies were included for analysis, comprising 552 miscarriages with informative results for both cfDNA and diagnostic testing. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 78% (95% CI: 71%-83%), 91% (95% CI: 86%-95%), and 92%, respectively. Pooled aneuploidy rate, the proportion of no-calls, and concordance were 61% (95% CI: 53%-69%), 4% (95% CI: 0%-12%), and 84% (95% CI: 81%-87%), respectively. In cases of positive cfDNA results, the risk of aneuploidy increased to 93%, whereas negative results yielded a 28% risk of aneuploidy.

Conclusion: cfDNA testing demonstrates acceptable accuracy in predicting fetal aneuploidy when employed as a screening test in miscarriages. The main advantage of cfDNA testing is that it does not require the availability of products of conception or prior chorionic villi sampling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信