在健康青年人群中应用多种DED管理方案后泪膜稳定性和泪液体积的短期变化

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Belén Sabucedo-Villamarin, Jacobo Garcia-Queiruga, Laura Cacabelos-Torres, Maria J Giraldez, Eva Yebra-Pimentel, Hugo Pena-Verdeal
{"title":"在健康青年人群中应用多种DED管理方案后泪膜稳定性和泪液体积的短期变化","authors":"Belén Sabucedo-Villamarin, Jacobo Garcia-Queiruga, Laura Cacabelos-Torres, Maria J Giraldez, Eva Yebra-Pimentel, Hugo Pena-Verdeal","doi":"10.3390/jpm15050173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> To determine short-term changes in tear film volume and stability after various treatments for dry eye disease in healthy participants. <b>Methods:</b> 36 healthy participants aged from 18 to 35 years were recruited for a single-session examination and randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (1:1:1 treatment, 1:1 eye): Group 1 (artificial tears 'Comfort Drops'), Group 2 (eyelid wipes 'Systane Lid Wipes'), and Group 3 (ocular bath 'Acuaiss'). Tear Meniscus Height (TMH) was assessed at baseline, 2, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min, and Non-Invasive Break-Up Time (NIBUT) at baseline, 2, 10, and 20 min, all using the OCULUS Keratograph 5M by one examiner. <b>Results:</b> Of the initially recruited participants, 35 were analyzed; one was excluded for reflex tearing. Group 1 (n = 12) showed a significant TMH increase at 2 min compared to 10 and 20 min (Friedman, <i>p</i> = 0.004; Bonferroni, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.028). Group 3 (n = 12) showed a significant increase at 2 and 5 min compared to baseline and decrease at 10 min against 2 and 5 min (Friedman, <i>p</i> < 0.001; Bonferroni, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.034). Group 2 (n = 11) showed no significant changes over time (Friedman, <i>p</i> = 0.108). NIBUT showed no significant differences at any time-point in any group (Friedman, <i>p</i> ≥ 0.231). Basal TMH differed between groups (ANOVA, <i>p</i> = 0.048), but post hoc analysis found no significance (Bonferroni, all <i>p</i> ≥ 0.088). No significant differences in TMH at other time-points (Kruskal-Wallis/ANOVA, <i>p</i> ≥ 0.265) or in NIBUT between groups (Kruskal-Wallis/ANOVA, <i>p</i> = 0.108) were found. <b>Conclusions</b>: In healthy participants, artificial tears and ocular baths temporarily increase TMH, while eyelid wipes do not. Neither has an immediate impact on NIBUT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12112829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-Term Changes in Tear Film Stability and Tear Volume Following the Application of Various DED Management Options in a Healthy Young Population.\",\"authors\":\"Belén Sabucedo-Villamarin, Jacobo Garcia-Queiruga, Laura Cacabelos-Torres, Maria J Giraldez, Eva Yebra-Pimentel, Hugo Pena-Verdeal\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jpm15050173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> To determine short-term changes in tear film volume and stability after various treatments for dry eye disease in healthy participants. <b>Methods:</b> 36 healthy participants aged from 18 to 35 years were recruited for a single-session examination and randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (1:1:1 treatment, 1:1 eye): Group 1 (artificial tears 'Comfort Drops'), Group 2 (eyelid wipes 'Systane Lid Wipes'), and Group 3 (ocular bath 'Acuaiss'). Tear Meniscus Height (TMH) was assessed at baseline, 2, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min, and Non-Invasive Break-Up Time (NIBUT) at baseline, 2, 10, and 20 min, all using the OCULUS Keratograph 5M by one examiner. <b>Results:</b> Of the initially recruited participants, 35 were analyzed; one was excluded for reflex tearing. Group 1 (n = 12) showed a significant TMH increase at 2 min compared to 10 and 20 min (Friedman, <i>p</i> = 0.004; Bonferroni, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.028). Group 3 (n = 12) showed a significant increase at 2 and 5 min compared to baseline and decrease at 10 min against 2 and 5 min (Friedman, <i>p</i> < 0.001; Bonferroni, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.034). Group 2 (n = 11) showed no significant changes over time (Friedman, <i>p</i> = 0.108). NIBUT showed no significant differences at any time-point in any group (Friedman, <i>p</i> ≥ 0.231). Basal TMH differed between groups (ANOVA, <i>p</i> = 0.048), but post hoc analysis found no significance (Bonferroni, all <i>p</i> ≥ 0.088). No significant differences in TMH at other time-points (Kruskal-Wallis/ANOVA, <i>p</i> ≥ 0.265) or in NIBUT between groups (Kruskal-Wallis/ANOVA, <i>p</i> = 0.108) were found. <b>Conclusions</b>: In healthy participants, artificial tears and ocular baths temporarily increase TMH, while eyelid wipes do not. Neither has an immediate impact on NIBUT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12112829/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15050173\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15050173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:确定健康参与者干眼病不同治疗后泪膜体积和稳定性的短期变化。方法:招募了36名年龄在18至35岁之间的健康参与者进行单次检查,并随机分配到三个治疗组(1:1:1治疗,1:1眼睛)中的一个:1组(人工泪液“舒适滴剂”),2组(眼睑湿巾“Systane Lid wipes”)和3组(眼浴“Acuaiss”)。在基线、2、5、10、15和20分钟评估撕裂半月板高度(TMH),在基线、2、10和20分钟评估无创破裂时间(NIBUT),均由一名审核员使用OCULUS角膜成像仪5M进行评估。结果:在最初招募的参与者中,有35人被分析;1例因反射性撕裂被排除。组1 (n = 12)与10和20 min相比,2 min时TMH显著增加(Friedman, p = 0.004;Bonferroni, p≤0.028)。第3组(n = 12)在2和5分钟时与基线相比显著增加,在10分钟时与2和5分钟相比显著减少(Friedman, p < 0.001;Bonferroni, p≤0.034)。第二组(n = 11)随时间变化无显著性差异(Friedman, p = 0.108)。NIBUT在任何时间点各组间均无显著差异(Friedman, p≥0.231)。各组之间的基础TMH存在差异(方差分析,p = 0.048),但事后分析发现无显著性(Bonferroni, p均≥0.088)。其他时间点TMH (Kruskal-Wallis/ANOVA, p≥0.265)和NIBUT组间差异无统计学意义(Kruskal-Wallis/ANOVA, p = 0.108)。结论:在健康参与者中,人工泪液和眼浴暂时增加TMH,而眼睑擦拭没有。两者都不会对NIBUT产生直接影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short-Term Changes in Tear Film Stability and Tear Volume Following the Application of Various DED Management Options in a Healthy Young Population.

Background: To determine short-term changes in tear film volume and stability after various treatments for dry eye disease in healthy participants. Methods: 36 healthy participants aged from 18 to 35 years were recruited for a single-session examination and randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (1:1:1 treatment, 1:1 eye): Group 1 (artificial tears 'Comfort Drops'), Group 2 (eyelid wipes 'Systane Lid Wipes'), and Group 3 (ocular bath 'Acuaiss'). Tear Meniscus Height (TMH) was assessed at baseline, 2, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min, and Non-Invasive Break-Up Time (NIBUT) at baseline, 2, 10, and 20 min, all using the OCULUS Keratograph 5M by one examiner. Results: Of the initially recruited participants, 35 were analyzed; one was excluded for reflex tearing. Group 1 (n = 12) showed a significant TMH increase at 2 min compared to 10 and 20 min (Friedman, p = 0.004; Bonferroni, p ≤ 0.028). Group 3 (n = 12) showed a significant increase at 2 and 5 min compared to baseline and decrease at 10 min against 2 and 5 min (Friedman, p < 0.001; Bonferroni, p ≤ 0.034). Group 2 (n = 11) showed no significant changes over time (Friedman, p = 0.108). NIBUT showed no significant differences at any time-point in any group (Friedman, p ≥ 0.231). Basal TMH differed between groups (ANOVA, p = 0.048), but post hoc analysis found no significance (Bonferroni, all p ≥ 0.088). No significant differences in TMH at other time-points (Kruskal-Wallis/ANOVA, p ≥ 0.265) or in NIBUT between groups (Kruskal-Wallis/ANOVA, p = 0.108) were found. Conclusions: In healthy participants, artificial tears and ocular baths temporarily increase TMH, while eyelid wipes do not. Neither has an immediate impact on NIBUT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信