双颌手术中患者特异性骨固定的准确性:四和二微型钢板固定的可行性比较分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hylke van der Wel, Haye Glas, Johan Jansma, Rutger Schepers
{"title":"双颌手术中患者特异性骨固定的准确性:四和二微型钢板固定的可行性比较分析。","authors":"Hylke van der Wel, Haye Glas, Johan Jansma, Rutger Schepers","doi":"10.3390/jpm15050186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Patient-specific osteosynthesis (PSO) plates, in combination with virtual surgical planning (VSP), have significantly improved the accuracy of orthognathic surgery. This study aimed to compare the surgical accuracy of two-plate versus four-plate fixation methods in Le Fort I osteotomies using PSO. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 21 patients who underwent maxilla-first bimaxillary surgery at a single centre in 2024. Eight patients received two-plate fixation, while thirteen received four-plate fixation. All surgeries were planned using VSP. Postoperative cone beam computed tomography scans were used to assess the accuracy of maxillary positioning by comparing the planned versus achieved outcomes in terms of translation and rotation. <b>Results</b>: Both fixation methods yielded comparable results in maxillary positioning, with no significant differences observed between the two groups regarding translational or rotational deviations. The two-plate PSO approach demonstrated practical benefits, including reduced material usage and the potential for smaller surgical incisions, without compromising surgical accuracy. <b>Conclusions</b>: Two-plate PSO fixation is a viable alternative to the traditional four-plate method for Le Fort I osteotomies, offering similar accuracy with potential procedural advantages. While these findings support broader clinical adoption, further research is warranted to confirm the results in larger cohorts and to investigate biomechanical considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Patient-Specific Osteosynthesis in Bimaxillary Surgery: Comparative Feasibility Analysis of Four- and Two-Miniplate Fixation.\",\"authors\":\"Hylke van der Wel, Haye Glas, Johan Jansma, Rutger Schepers\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jpm15050186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Patient-specific osteosynthesis (PSO) plates, in combination with virtual surgical planning (VSP), have significantly improved the accuracy of orthognathic surgery. This study aimed to compare the surgical accuracy of two-plate versus four-plate fixation methods in Le Fort I osteotomies using PSO. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 21 patients who underwent maxilla-first bimaxillary surgery at a single centre in 2024. Eight patients received two-plate fixation, while thirteen received four-plate fixation. All surgeries were planned using VSP. Postoperative cone beam computed tomography scans were used to assess the accuracy of maxillary positioning by comparing the planned versus achieved outcomes in terms of translation and rotation. <b>Results</b>: Both fixation methods yielded comparable results in maxillary positioning, with no significant differences observed between the two groups regarding translational or rotational deviations. The two-plate PSO approach demonstrated practical benefits, including reduced material usage and the potential for smaller surgical incisions, without compromising surgical accuracy. <b>Conclusions</b>: Two-plate PSO fixation is a viable alternative to the traditional four-plate method for Le Fort I osteotomies, offering similar accuracy with potential procedural advantages. While these findings support broader clinical adoption, further research is warranted to confirm the results in larger cohorts and to investigate biomechanical considerations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113514/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15050186\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15050186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:患者特异性骨合成(PSO)钢板与虚拟手术计划(VSP)相结合,显著提高了正颌手术的准确性。本研究旨在比较采用PSO的Le Fort I型截骨术中两钢板与四钢板固定方法的手术准确性。方法:对2024年在同一中心行上颌优先双颌手术的21例患者进行回顾性队列研究。8例接受两板固定,13例接受四板固定。所有手术均计划使用VSP。术后使用锥形束计算机断层扫描通过比较计划和实现的平移和旋转结果来评估上颌定位的准确性。结果:两种固定方法在上颌定位方面的效果相当,两组之间在平移或旋转偏差方面没有显著差异。双板PSO方法显示了实际的好处,包括减少材料的使用和潜在的更小的手术切口,而不影响手术的准确性。结论:双钢板PSO固定是传统的四钢板Le Fort I型截骨术的可行替代方法,具有相似的准确性和潜在的手术优势。虽然这些发现支持更广泛的临床应用,但需要进一步的研究来证实更大的队列结果并调查生物力学方面的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of Patient-Specific Osteosynthesis in Bimaxillary Surgery: Comparative Feasibility Analysis of Four- and Two-Miniplate Fixation.

Background/Objectives: Patient-specific osteosynthesis (PSO) plates, in combination with virtual surgical planning (VSP), have significantly improved the accuracy of orthognathic surgery. This study aimed to compare the surgical accuracy of two-plate versus four-plate fixation methods in Le Fort I osteotomies using PSO. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 21 patients who underwent maxilla-first bimaxillary surgery at a single centre in 2024. Eight patients received two-plate fixation, while thirteen received four-plate fixation. All surgeries were planned using VSP. Postoperative cone beam computed tomography scans were used to assess the accuracy of maxillary positioning by comparing the planned versus achieved outcomes in terms of translation and rotation. Results: Both fixation methods yielded comparable results in maxillary positioning, with no significant differences observed between the two groups regarding translational or rotational deviations. The two-plate PSO approach demonstrated practical benefits, including reduced material usage and the potential for smaller surgical incisions, without compromising surgical accuracy. Conclusions: Two-plate PSO fixation is a viable alternative to the traditional four-plate method for Le Fort I osteotomies, offering similar accuracy with potential procedural advantages. While these findings support broader clinical adoption, further research is warranted to confirm the results in larger cohorts and to investigate biomechanical considerations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信