评估功能性运动无力的实用指南:对经过验证的技术的回顾。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
James Dolbow, Soheil El-Azzouni, Yiyi Zhang, Christopher Geiger
{"title":"评估功能性运动无力的实用指南:对经过验证的技术的回顾。","authors":"James Dolbow, Soheil El-Azzouni, Yiyi Zhang, Christopher Geiger","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13139-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Functional neurological symptom disorder, specifically, functional limb weakness, is a commonly seen condition in clinical neurological practice and requires careful examination for diagnosis. Specific and detailed examination techniques have been developed and validated over the past 100 years to help clinicians differentiate functional limb weakness from objective neurological weakness. These techniques vary in sensitivity, specificity, clinical application, and limitations. However, over time, the studied and/or validated forms of these exam techniques may have been lost and often not performed or taught in the way it was originally studied, thus decreasing the reliability of the examiner's findings. With many new examination techniques for functional limb weakness having been studied in recent years, it is important to not only review the form of each of these examination techniques, but also discuss the clinical applications, limitations, and utility of each. To date, there has been no comprehensive review demonstrating the exact form of all the studied and/or validated examination techniques for functional limb weakness and their proposed clinical utility. This review analyzes 9 examination techniques for functional limb weakness that have been studied for validity and provides readers with the exact technique of examination used to study each. It also outlines their sensitivity, specificity, clinical applications, and limitations to help clinicians accurately diagnose functional limb weakness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 6","pages":"427"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A practical guide to assessing functional motor weakness: a review of validated techniques.\",\"authors\":\"James Dolbow, Soheil El-Azzouni, Yiyi Zhang, Christopher Geiger\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-025-13139-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Functional neurological symptom disorder, specifically, functional limb weakness, is a commonly seen condition in clinical neurological practice and requires careful examination for diagnosis. Specific and detailed examination techniques have been developed and validated over the past 100 years to help clinicians differentiate functional limb weakness from objective neurological weakness. These techniques vary in sensitivity, specificity, clinical application, and limitations. However, over time, the studied and/or validated forms of these exam techniques may have been lost and often not performed or taught in the way it was originally studied, thus decreasing the reliability of the examiner's findings. With many new examination techniques for functional limb weakness having been studied in recent years, it is important to not only review the form of each of these examination techniques, but also discuss the clinical applications, limitations, and utility of each. To date, there has been no comprehensive review demonstrating the exact form of all the studied and/or validated examination techniques for functional limb weakness and their proposed clinical utility. This review analyzes 9 examination techniques for functional limb weakness that have been studied for validity and provides readers with the exact technique of examination used to study each. It also outlines their sensitivity, specificity, clinical applications, and limitations to help clinicians accurately diagnose functional limb weakness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 6\",\"pages\":\"427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13139-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13139-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

功能性神经症状障碍,特别是功能性肢体无力,是临床神经学实践中的常见病,需要仔细检查诊断。在过去的100年里,专门和详细的检查技术已经发展和验证,以帮助临床医生区分功能性肢体无力和客观神经系统无力。这些技术在敏感性、特异性、临床应用和局限性方面各不相同。然而,随着时间的推移,这些考试技巧的研究和/或验证形式可能已经丢失,并且经常不按照最初研究的方式执行或教授,从而降低了考官发现的可靠性。近年来研究了许多新的功能性肢体无力检查技术,不仅要回顾每种检查技术的形式,而且要讨论每种检查技术的临床应用,局限性和实用性。迄今为止,还没有全面的综述证明所有研究和/或验证的功能性肢体无力检查技术的确切形式及其拟议的临床应用。本文对功能性肢体无力的9种检查技术进行了有效性研究,并为读者提供了用于研究每种检查技术的确切方法。它还概述了它们的敏感性、特异性、临床应用和局限性,以帮助临床医生准确诊断功能性肢体无力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A practical guide to assessing functional motor weakness: a review of validated techniques.

Functional neurological symptom disorder, specifically, functional limb weakness, is a commonly seen condition in clinical neurological practice and requires careful examination for diagnosis. Specific and detailed examination techniques have been developed and validated over the past 100 years to help clinicians differentiate functional limb weakness from objective neurological weakness. These techniques vary in sensitivity, specificity, clinical application, and limitations. However, over time, the studied and/or validated forms of these exam techniques may have been lost and often not performed or taught in the way it was originally studied, thus decreasing the reliability of the examiner's findings. With many new examination techniques for functional limb weakness having been studied in recent years, it is important to not only review the form of each of these examination techniques, but also discuss the clinical applications, limitations, and utility of each. To date, there has been no comprehensive review demonstrating the exact form of all the studied and/or validated examination techniques for functional limb weakness and their proposed clinical utility. This review analyzes 9 examination techniques for functional limb weakness that have been studied for validity and provides readers with the exact technique of examination used to study each. It also outlines their sensitivity, specificity, clinical applications, and limitations to help clinicians accurately diagnose functional limb weakness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信