牙周病教育:过去、现在和未来。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mariano Sanz, Elena Figuero, David Herrera
{"title":"牙周病教育:过去、现在和未来。","authors":"Mariano Sanz,&nbsp;Elena Figuero,&nbsp;David Herrera","doi":"10.1111/jre.13417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The harmonization of dental education in Europe occurred alongside the broader process of European convergence in higher education initiated by the La Sorbonne Declaration in 1998 and the signing of the Bologna Declaration in 1999. This declaration emphasized the importance of achieving coherence within the European higher education area while maintaining diversity. It established a two-tier structure consisting of undergraduate and postgraduate cycles [<span>1</span>]. Additionally, it introduced a common credit system known as the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System or ECTS. It promoted curricular development, inter-institutional collaboration, and the integration of studies, training, and research to enhance mobility and ensure comparable criteria and methodologies. With this aim, the Association for Dental Education in Europe (ADEE) and the “DentEd” thematic network secured funding from the European Commission for a third Network Project, “DentEd III” (2004–2007), to create a curricular model in dentistry that fully complies with the principles of the Bologna Declaration [<span>2</span>].</p><p>The first step in this challenge was to agree on a professional profile with a defined set of general and specific competencies. Despite the need for graduates equipped to undertake independent dental practice safely, the educational and training programs varied significantly, with each school and country adopting different approaches shaped by their structures, cultures, and resources. Nevertheless, there was a common aspiration to achieve the highest possible standards in educational outcomes and relevant clinical competencies, enabling graduates to move freely and practice anywhere in Europe [<span>3</span>]. The profile of the dentist was defined in the European Union by a directive on the recognition of professional qualifications, which stated: “<i>All Member States must recognize the profession of dental practitioner, equipped with the skills needed for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases related to the teeth, mouth, jaws, and associated tissues</i>.” It was further emphasized that dental training should consist of at least five years of full-time theoretical and practical training.</p><p>Based on these legal provisions, the proposed ADEE Dental Curricular structure was organized into modules according to the ECTS and aligned with the profile, domains, and competencies approved by ADEE. This framework defines competencies as a combination of knowledge, skills, and attitudes relevant to the dental education process, with a minimum acceptable level of performance for graduating dentists, emphasizing speed and accuracy that is consistent with patient well-being rather than performance at the highest possible level. Competencies were organized into seven domains representing the broad categories of professional activity and dimensions that occur in the general practice of dentistry: (I) professionalism, (II) communication and interpersonal skills, (III) knowledge base, (IV) information handling and critical thinking, (V) clinical information gathering, (VI) diagnosis and treatment planning, and (VII) the establishment and maintenance of oral health. While domains I, II, and IV pertain to all dental disciplines and thus represent horizontal competencies, those related to domains III, V, and VI concern the content, learning outcomes, and specific competencies of the different classical dental disciplines (cariology, periodontology, orthodontics, endodontics, restorative dentistry, prosthetics, etc.) [<span>2</span>].</p><p>These well-established disciplines have defined the specific supporting competencies relevant to their respective fields, outlining the attitudes, skills, and learning outcomes expected of dental graduates. This framework provides a benchmark for reviewing, refining, and reshaping the undergraduate curriculum, enhancing student evaluation processes, and implementing outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of the educational process. Among these disciplines, Periodontology is one of the major oral health sciences that studies the biology of periodontal and peri-implant tissues and the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of their associated conditions and diseases. In the last 25 years, formal education and training in Periodontology have been redefined as part of the harmonization process of higher education in Europe, defined by the Bologna Declaration and, specifically for dentistry, by the DENTED project.</p><p>This perspective article aims to examine this process by focusing on past, present, and future perspectives in Education in Periodontology.</p><p>As explained above, education in Periodontology encompasses various tiers, ranging from formal undergraduate training to become a dentist, to postgraduate education and training for achieving specialist status and including other forms of education in Periodontology. These forms allow general dentists to complement and enhance the competencies and learning outcomes acquired during their undergraduate training as part of continuing education or professional development. This is particularly relevant in dentistry, where advances in research and technology clearly surpass the framework of the undergraduate curriculum and require the development of new competencies, learning outcomes, and skills needed to stay current in modern periodontics. In fact, the European Union developed a framework for this mode of education, under the name “<i>vocational education and training</i>”, based on the Bruges/Copenhagen process [<span>9, 10</span>]. However, the very limited penetration of this initiative and the heterogeneity of regulations among the European countries [<span>11</span>] prevent the discussion of this mode of education within the present perspective article. Given the high prevalence of periodontal diseases, dentists with specialist-level training (if available) can care for only a very limited proportion of patients with periodontal needs. Therefore, general practitioners and dentists with a specific interest in periodontal practice are essential for managing the periodontal health of the general population.</p><p>At both undergraduate and postgraduate levels, the future of periodontal education in Europe was recently discussed during the second EFP European Consensus Workshop on Periodontal Education in 2023. One of the objectives of this workshop was to ensure the full integration of the 2018 classification for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions [<span>21</span>] into the periodontal undergraduate curriculum, along with the S3 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the treatment of periodontitis patients and the prevention and treatment of peri-implant diseases [<span>22-24</span>]. It also aimed to adapt the 2009 EFP periodontal educational framework to the updated educational framework for Dental Undergraduate Education and Training adopted by ADEE in 2017 [<span>25</span>].</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":16715,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontal research","volume":"60 4","pages":"291-299"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jre.13417","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Education in Periodontology: The Past, the Present, and the Future\",\"authors\":\"Mariano Sanz,&nbsp;Elena Figuero,&nbsp;David Herrera\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jre.13417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The harmonization of dental education in Europe occurred alongside the broader process of European convergence in higher education initiated by the La Sorbonne Declaration in 1998 and the signing of the Bologna Declaration in 1999. This declaration emphasized the importance of achieving coherence within the European higher education area while maintaining diversity. It established a two-tier structure consisting of undergraduate and postgraduate cycles [<span>1</span>]. Additionally, it introduced a common credit system known as the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System or ECTS. It promoted curricular development, inter-institutional collaboration, and the integration of studies, training, and research to enhance mobility and ensure comparable criteria and methodologies. With this aim, the Association for Dental Education in Europe (ADEE) and the “DentEd” thematic network secured funding from the European Commission for a third Network Project, “DentEd III” (2004–2007), to create a curricular model in dentistry that fully complies with the principles of the Bologna Declaration [<span>2</span>].</p><p>The first step in this challenge was to agree on a professional profile with a defined set of general and specific competencies. Despite the need for graduates equipped to undertake independent dental practice safely, the educational and training programs varied significantly, with each school and country adopting different approaches shaped by their structures, cultures, and resources. Nevertheless, there was a common aspiration to achieve the highest possible standards in educational outcomes and relevant clinical competencies, enabling graduates to move freely and practice anywhere in Europe [<span>3</span>]. The profile of the dentist was defined in the European Union by a directive on the recognition of professional qualifications, which stated: “<i>All Member States must recognize the profession of dental practitioner, equipped with the skills needed for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases related to the teeth, mouth, jaws, and associated tissues</i>.” It was further emphasized that dental training should consist of at least five years of full-time theoretical and practical training.</p><p>Based on these legal provisions, the proposed ADEE Dental Curricular structure was organized into modules according to the ECTS and aligned with the profile, domains, and competencies approved by ADEE. This framework defines competencies as a combination of knowledge, skills, and attitudes relevant to the dental education process, with a minimum acceptable level of performance for graduating dentists, emphasizing speed and accuracy that is consistent with patient well-being rather than performance at the highest possible level. Competencies were organized into seven domains representing the broad categories of professional activity and dimensions that occur in the general practice of dentistry: (I) professionalism, (II) communication and interpersonal skills, (III) knowledge base, (IV) information handling and critical thinking, (V) clinical information gathering, (VI) diagnosis and treatment planning, and (VII) the establishment and maintenance of oral health. While domains I, II, and IV pertain to all dental disciplines and thus represent horizontal competencies, those related to domains III, V, and VI concern the content, learning outcomes, and specific competencies of the different classical dental disciplines (cariology, periodontology, orthodontics, endodontics, restorative dentistry, prosthetics, etc.) [<span>2</span>].</p><p>These well-established disciplines have defined the specific supporting competencies relevant to their respective fields, outlining the attitudes, skills, and learning outcomes expected of dental graduates. This framework provides a benchmark for reviewing, refining, and reshaping the undergraduate curriculum, enhancing student evaluation processes, and implementing outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of the educational process. Among these disciplines, Periodontology is one of the major oral health sciences that studies the biology of periodontal and peri-implant tissues and the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of their associated conditions and diseases. In the last 25 years, formal education and training in Periodontology have been redefined as part of the harmonization process of higher education in Europe, defined by the Bologna Declaration and, specifically for dentistry, by the DENTED project.</p><p>This perspective article aims to examine this process by focusing on past, present, and future perspectives in Education in Periodontology.</p><p>As explained above, education in Periodontology encompasses various tiers, ranging from formal undergraduate training to become a dentist, to postgraduate education and training for achieving specialist status and including other forms of education in Periodontology. These forms allow general dentists to complement and enhance the competencies and learning outcomes acquired during their undergraduate training as part of continuing education or professional development. This is particularly relevant in dentistry, where advances in research and technology clearly surpass the framework of the undergraduate curriculum and require the development of new competencies, learning outcomes, and skills needed to stay current in modern periodontics. In fact, the European Union developed a framework for this mode of education, under the name “<i>vocational education and training</i>”, based on the Bruges/Copenhagen process [<span>9, 10</span>]. However, the very limited penetration of this initiative and the heterogeneity of regulations among the European countries [<span>11</span>] prevent the discussion of this mode of education within the present perspective article. Given the high prevalence of periodontal diseases, dentists with specialist-level training (if available) can care for only a very limited proportion of patients with periodontal needs. Therefore, general practitioners and dentists with a specific interest in periodontal practice are essential for managing the periodontal health of the general population.</p><p>At both undergraduate and postgraduate levels, the future of periodontal education in Europe was recently discussed during the second EFP European Consensus Workshop on Periodontal Education in 2023. One of the objectives of this workshop was to ensure the full integration of the 2018 classification for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions [<span>21</span>] into the periodontal undergraduate curriculum, along with the S3 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the treatment of periodontitis patients and the prevention and treatment of peri-implant diseases [<span>22-24</span>]. It also aimed to adapt the 2009 EFP periodontal educational framework to the updated educational framework for Dental Undergraduate Education and Training adopted by ADEE in 2017 [<span>25</span>].</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of periodontal research\",\"volume\":\"60 4\",\"pages\":\"291-299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jre.13417\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of periodontal research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jre.13417\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontal research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jre.13417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲牙科教育的统一是伴随着1998年《索邦大学宣言》和1999年《博洛尼亚宣言》的签署而发起的欧洲高等教育趋同的更广泛进程而发生的。该宣言强调了在保持多样性的同时在欧洲高等教育领域内实现一致性的重要性。它建立了一个两层结构,包括本科和研究生周期[1]。此外,它还引入了一个被称为欧洲学分转换和积累系统(ECTS)的共同学分系统。它促进课程发展、机构间合作以及研究、培训和研究的整合,以加强流动性并确保可比较的标准和方法。为了实现这一目标,欧洲牙科教育协会(ADEE)和“凹陷”主题网络从欧洲委员会获得了第三个网络项目“凹陷III”(2004-2007)的资金,以创建一个完全符合博洛尼亚宣言原则的牙科课程模式。这一挑战的第一步是就一套明确的一般和特定能力的专业概况达成一致。尽管需要毕业生能够安全独立地从事牙科实践,但教育和培训计划差异很大,每个学校和国家采用不同的方法,这取决于他们的结构、文化和资源。尽管如此,大家都希望在教育成果和相关临床能力方面达到最高标准,使毕业生能够在欧洲任何地方自由流动和实践。在欧盟,一项关于承认专业资格的指令定义了牙医的概况,该指令规定:“所有成员国必须承认牙科医生的职业,具备预防、诊断和治疗与牙齿、口腔、颌骨和相关组织有关的疾病所需的技能。”有人进一步强调,牙科培训应包括至少五年的全时理论和实践培训。根据这些法律规定,拟议的ADEE牙科课程结构根据ECTS被组织成模块,并与ADEE批准的简介、领域和能力保持一致。该框架将能力定义为与牙科教育过程相关的知识、技能和态度的组合,具有毕业牙医可接受的最低水平的表现,强调与患者福祉相一致的速度和准确性,而不是最高水平的表现。能力被分为七个领域,代表了牙科全科实践中出现的专业活动和维度的广泛类别:(I)专业精神,(II)沟通和人际交往能力,(III)知识基础,(IV)信息处理和批判性思维,(V)临床信息收集,(VI)诊断和治疗计划,以及(VII)建立和维护口腔健康。虽然领域I、II和IV涉及所有牙科学科,因此代表横向能力,但与领域III、V和VI相关的领域涉及不同经典牙科学科(龋齿学、牙周病学、正畸学、牙髓学、修复牙科、修复学等)的内容、学习成果和特定能力。这些建立良好的学科已经定义了与各自领域相关的具体支持能力,概述了牙科毕业生的态度,技能和学习成果。该框架为审查、完善和重塑本科课程、加强学生评价过程和实施结果措施以评估教育过程的有效性提供了基准。在这些学科中,牙周病学是主要的口腔健康科学之一,它研究牙周和种植体周围组织的生物学以及相关疾病的诊断、预防和治疗。在过去的25年里,牙周病的正规教育和培训已经被重新定义为欧洲高等教育协调进程的一部分,由博洛尼亚宣言定义,特别是牙科,由凹陷项目定义。这篇观点文章的目的是通过关注牙周病教育的过去、现在和未来的观点来检查这一过程。如上所述,牙周病学教育包括不同层次,从正规的本科培训成为牙医,到研究生教育和达到专家地位的培训,包括牙周病学其他形式的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Education in Periodontology: The Past, the Present, and the Future

The harmonization of dental education in Europe occurred alongside the broader process of European convergence in higher education initiated by the La Sorbonne Declaration in 1998 and the signing of the Bologna Declaration in 1999. This declaration emphasized the importance of achieving coherence within the European higher education area while maintaining diversity. It established a two-tier structure consisting of undergraduate and postgraduate cycles [1]. Additionally, it introduced a common credit system known as the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System or ECTS. It promoted curricular development, inter-institutional collaboration, and the integration of studies, training, and research to enhance mobility and ensure comparable criteria and methodologies. With this aim, the Association for Dental Education in Europe (ADEE) and the “DentEd” thematic network secured funding from the European Commission for a third Network Project, “DentEd III” (2004–2007), to create a curricular model in dentistry that fully complies with the principles of the Bologna Declaration [2].

The first step in this challenge was to agree on a professional profile with a defined set of general and specific competencies. Despite the need for graduates equipped to undertake independent dental practice safely, the educational and training programs varied significantly, with each school and country adopting different approaches shaped by their structures, cultures, and resources. Nevertheless, there was a common aspiration to achieve the highest possible standards in educational outcomes and relevant clinical competencies, enabling graduates to move freely and practice anywhere in Europe [3]. The profile of the dentist was defined in the European Union by a directive on the recognition of professional qualifications, which stated: “All Member States must recognize the profession of dental practitioner, equipped with the skills needed for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases related to the teeth, mouth, jaws, and associated tissues.” It was further emphasized that dental training should consist of at least five years of full-time theoretical and practical training.

Based on these legal provisions, the proposed ADEE Dental Curricular structure was organized into modules according to the ECTS and aligned with the profile, domains, and competencies approved by ADEE. This framework defines competencies as a combination of knowledge, skills, and attitudes relevant to the dental education process, with a minimum acceptable level of performance for graduating dentists, emphasizing speed and accuracy that is consistent with patient well-being rather than performance at the highest possible level. Competencies were organized into seven domains representing the broad categories of professional activity and dimensions that occur in the general practice of dentistry: (I) professionalism, (II) communication and interpersonal skills, (III) knowledge base, (IV) information handling and critical thinking, (V) clinical information gathering, (VI) diagnosis and treatment planning, and (VII) the establishment and maintenance of oral health. While domains I, II, and IV pertain to all dental disciplines and thus represent horizontal competencies, those related to domains III, V, and VI concern the content, learning outcomes, and specific competencies of the different classical dental disciplines (cariology, periodontology, orthodontics, endodontics, restorative dentistry, prosthetics, etc.) [2].

These well-established disciplines have defined the specific supporting competencies relevant to their respective fields, outlining the attitudes, skills, and learning outcomes expected of dental graduates. This framework provides a benchmark for reviewing, refining, and reshaping the undergraduate curriculum, enhancing student evaluation processes, and implementing outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of the educational process. Among these disciplines, Periodontology is one of the major oral health sciences that studies the biology of periodontal and peri-implant tissues and the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of their associated conditions and diseases. In the last 25 years, formal education and training in Periodontology have been redefined as part of the harmonization process of higher education in Europe, defined by the Bologna Declaration and, specifically for dentistry, by the DENTED project.

This perspective article aims to examine this process by focusing on past, present, and future perspectives in Education in Periodontology.

As explained above, education in Periodontology encompasses various tiers, ranging from formal undergraduate training to become a dentist, to postgraduate education and training for achieving specialist status and including other forms of education in Periodontology. These forms allow general dentists to complement and enhance the competencies and learning outcomes acquired during their undergraduate training as part of continuing education or professional development. This is particularly relevant in dentistry, where advances in research and technology clearly surpass the framework of the undergraduate curriculum and require the development of new competencies, learning outcomes, and skills needed to stay current in modern periodontics. In fact, the European Union developed a framework for this mode of education, under the name “vocational education and training”, based on the Bruges/Copenhagen process [9, 10]. However, the very limited penetration of this initiative and the heterogeneity of regulations among the European countries [11] prevent the discussion of this mode of education within the present perspective article. Given the high prevalence of periodontal diseases, dentists with specialist-level training (if available) can care for only a very limited proportion of patients with periodontal needs. Therefore, general practitioners and dentists with a specific interest in periodontal practice are essential for managing the periodontal health of the general population.

At both undergraduate and postgraduate levels, the future of periodontal education in Europe was recently discussed during the second EFP European Consensus Workshop on Periodontal Education in 2023. One of the objectives of this workshop was to ensure the full integration of the 2018 classification for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions [21] into the periodontal undergraduate curriculum, along with the S3 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the treatment of periodontitis patients and the prevention and treatment of peri-implant diseases [22-24]. It also aimed to adapt the 2009 EFP periodontal educational framework to the updated educational framework for Dental Undergraduate Education and Training adopted by ADEE in 2017 [25].

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of periodontal research
Journal of periodontal research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Periodontal Research is an international research periodical the purpose of which is to publish original clinical and basic investigations and review articles concerned with every aspect of periodontology and related sciences. Brief communications (1-3 journal pages) are also accepted and a special effort is made to ensure their rapid publication. Reports of scientific meetings in periodontology and related fields are also published. One volume of six issues is published annually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信