Dominique Koensgen, Charlotte Lukannek, Carolin Schroeder, Lucia A Otten, Amadeus Hornemann, Alexander Mustea
{"title":"机器人辅助肌腱移植治疗盆腔器官脱垂1例报告。","authors":"Dominique Koensgen, Charlotte Lukannek, Carolin Schroeder, Lucia A Otten, Amadeus Hornemann, Alexander Mustea","doi":"10.1186/s13256-025-05267-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of pelvic organ prolapse remains a clinical challenge, particularly with concerns regarding the safety of synthetic mesh-based procedures. In response, we present a novel approach for apical prolapse repair utilizing robotic assistance for tendon transplantation, offering a promising alternative to the use of synthetic meshes.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 47-year-old multiparous woman (white, non-Hispanic) with a history of three vaginal deliveries and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy presented with symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse, including vaginal discomfort, recurrent urinary tract infections, and overactive bladder. Clinical examination and ultrasonography revealed a combined anterior and apical vaginal prolapse grade II according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system. A robotic sacrocervicopexy with a semitendinosus autograft, harvested from the left popliteal fossa, and concomitant anterior colporrhaphy were performed. The surgical procedure included the dissection of the ligamentum longitudinale using a nerve-sparing technique, cervix preparation, and tendon transplantation. The surgery lasted 172 min without intraoperative complications. The patient's postoperative recovery was swift without residual prolapse, voiding dysfunction, or urinary incontinence reported at any of the follow-up examinations, conducted at 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the operation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case report demonstrates the successful application of a robotic-assisted tendon transplantation approach for apical prolapse repair, offering a safe and effective alternative to synthetic mesh-based surgical procedures. An ongoing multicenter registry study aims to further validate the method's safety and efficacy, paving the way for its broader adoption in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","volume":"19 1","pages":"253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic-assisted tendon transplantation-approach for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a case report.\",\"authors\":\"Dominique Koensgen, Charlotte Lukannek, Carolin Schroeder, Lucia A Otten, Amadeus Hornemann, Alexander Mustea\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13256-025-05267-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of pelvic organ prolapse remains a clinical challenge, particularly with concerns regarding the safety of synthetic mesh-based procedures. In response, we present a novel approach for apical prolapse repair utilizing robotic assistance for tendon transplantation, offering a promising alternative to the use of synthetic meshes.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 47-year-old multiparous woman (white, non-Hispanic) with a history of three vaginal deliveries and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy presented with symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse, including vaginal discomfort, recurrent urinary tract infections, and overactive bladder. Clinical examination and ultrasonography revealed a combined anterior and apical vaginal prolapse grade II according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system. A robotic sacrocervicopexy with a semitendinosus autograft, harvested from the left popliteal fossa, and concomitant anterior colporrhaphy were performed. The surgical procedure included the dissection of the ligamentum longitudinale using a nerve-sparing technique, cervix preparation, and tendon transplantation. The surgery lasted 172 min without intraoperative complications. The patient's postoperative recovery was swift without residual prolapse, voiding dysfunction, or urinary incontinence reported at any of the follow-up examinations, conducted at 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the operation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case report demonstrates the successful application of a robotic-assisted tendon transplantation approach for apical prolapse repair, offering a safe and effective alternative to synthetic mesh-based surgical procedures. An ongoing multicenter registry study aims to further validate the method's safety and efficacy, paving the way for its broader adoption in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108028/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-025-05267-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-025-05267-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Robotic-assisted tendon transplantation-approach for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a case report.
Background: The management of pelvic organ prolapse remains a clinical challenge, particularly with concerns regarding the safety of synthetic mesh-based procedures. In response, we present a novel approach for apical prolapse repair utilizing robotic assistance for tendon transplantation, offering a promising alternative to the use of synthetic meshes.
Case presentation: A 47-year-old multiparous woman (white, non-Hispanic) with a history of three vaginal deliveries and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy presented with symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse, including vaginal discomfort, recurrent urinary tract infections, and overactive bladder. Clinical examination and ultrasonography revealed a combined anterior and apical vaginal prolapse grade II according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system. A robotic sacrocervicopexy with a semitendinosus autograft, harvested from the left popliteal fossa, and concomitant anterior colporrhaphy were performed. The surgical procedure included the dissection of the ligamentum longitudinale using a nerve-sparing technique, cervix preparation, and tendon transplantation. The surgery lasted 172 min without intraoperative complications. The patient's postoperative recovery was swift without residual prolapse, voiding dysfunction, or urinary incontinence reported at any of the follow-up examinations, conducted at 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the operation.
Conclusion: This case report demonstrates the successful application of a robotic-assisted tendon transplantation approach for apical prolapse repair, offering a safe and effective alternative to synthetic mesh-based surgical procedures. An ongoing multicenter registry study aims to further validate the method's safety and efficacy, paving the way for its broader adoption in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
JMCR is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that will consider any original case report that expands the field of general medical knowledge. Reports should show one of the following: 1. Unreported or unusual side effects or adverse interactions involving medications 2. Unexpected or unusual presentations of a disease 3. New associations or variations in disease processes 4. Presentations, diagnoses and/or management of new and emerging diseases 5. An unexpected association between diseases or symptoms 6. An unexpected event in the course of observing or treating a patient 7. Findings that shed new light on the possible pathogenesis of a disease or an adverse effect