{"title":"癌症患者在诊断后第一年的感知污名化:社会经济地位的作用。","authors":"Jochen Ernst, Anne-Kathrin Köditz, Ute Goerling, Tanja Zimmermann, Beate Hornemann, Franziska Springer, Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf","doi":"10.1007/s11764-025-01834-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Stigmatization in cancer patients leads to poorer health-related outcomes. The effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on stigmatization has not been investigated. We therefore aim to investigate, which differences in stigmatization in cancer patients regarding SES exist up to one year after diagnosis and which medical and demographic characteristics are associated with stigmatization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with different solid cancer diagnoses were assessed within two months after diagnosis (t1) and at a 12-month follow-up (t2). Stigmatization was assessed using the Social Impact Scale (SIS), which comprises four dimensions: isolation, rejection, shame and financial insecurity. An SIS-total score can be computed. Bivariate and multiple regression analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred-eighty patients completed the assessments (mean age 60.4; 51.2% male; most prevalent cancers: prostate (21.0%), skin (17.1%), breast (16.2%)). Stigmatization at t1 was moderate in all dimensions, independent of SES. It decreased at t2, especially in patients with middle or high SES (p < 0.001). Low SES was identified as a risk factor for stigmatization at t2 (p = 0.036 - p < 0.001). Other predictors include stigmatization at t1 as well as distress, disease stage and cancer diagnosis, e.g. lung cancer. The predictors explained 27-43% of the variance in stigmatization in the four dimensions resp. in the SIS-total score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stigmatization after cancer diagnosis was dependent of SES. Reasons may be fewer social and economic resources, lower health literacy and insufficient consideration of the specific needs of this patient group in the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Implication for cancer survivors: </strong>Patients with low SES should receive greater attention in the medical care system and in scientific research to identify and mitigate possible burdens and subsequent problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived stigmatization in cancer patients during the first year after diagnosis: the role of socioeconomic status.\",\"authors\":\"Jochen Ernst, Anne-Kathrin Köditz, Ute Goerling, Tanja Zimmermann, Beate Hornemann, Franziska Springer, Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11764-025-01834-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Stigmatization in cancer patients leads to poorer health-related outcomes. The effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on stigmatization has not been investigated. We therefore aim to investigate, which differences in stigmatization in cancer patients regarding SES exist up to one year after diagnosis and which medical and demographic characteristics are associated with stigmatization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with different solid cancer diagnoses were assessed within two months after diagnosis (t1) and at a 12-month follow-up (t2). Stigmatization was assessed using the Social Impact Scale (SIS), which comprises four dimensions: isolation, rejection, shame and financial insecurity. An SIS-total score can be computed. Bivariate and multiple regression analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred-eighty patients completed the assessments (mean age 60.4; 51.2% male; most prevalent cancers: prostate (21.0%), skin (17.1%), breast (16.2%)). Stigmatization at t1 was moderate in all dimensions, independent of SES. It decreased at t2, especially in patients with middle or high SES (p < 0.001). Low SES was identified as a risk factor for stigmatization at t2 (p = 0.036 - p < 0.001). Other predictors include stigmatization at t1 as well as distress, disease stage and cancer diagnosis, e.g. lung cancer. The predictors explained 27-43% of the variance in stigmatization in the four dimensions resp. in the SIS-total score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stigmatization after cancer diagnosis was dependent of SES. Reasons may be fewer social and economic resources, lower health literacy and insufficient consideration of the specific needs of this patient group in the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Implication for cancer survivors: </strong>Patients with low SES should receive greater attention in the medical care system and in scientific research to identify and mitigate possible burdens and subsequent problems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Survivorship\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Survivorship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-025-01834-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-025-01834-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perceived stigmatization in cancer patients during the first year after diagnosis: the role of socioeconomic status.
Purpose: Stigmatization in cancer patients leads to poorer health-related outcomes. The effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on stigmatization has not been investigated. We therefore aim to investigate, which differences in stigmatization in cancer patients regarding SES exist up to one year after diagnosis and which medical and demographic characteristics are associated with stigmatization.
Methods: Patients with different solid cancer diagnoses were assessed within two months after diagnosis (t1) and at a 12-month follow-up (t2). Stigmatization was assessed using the Social Impact Scale (SIS), which comprises four dimensions: isolation, rejection, shame and financial insecurity. An SIS-total score can be computed. Bivariate and multiple regression analysis were performed.
Results: Six hundred-eighty patients completed the assessments (mean age 60.4; 51.2% male; most prevalent cancers: prostate (21.0%), skin (17.1%), breast (16.2%)). Stigmatization at t1 was moderate in all dimensions, independent of SES. It decreased at t2, especially in patients with middle or high SES (p < 0.001). Low SES was identified as a risk factor for stigmatization at t2 (p = 0.036 - p < 0.001). Other predictors include stigmatization at t1 as well as distress, disease stage and cancer diagnosis, e.g. lung cancer. The predictors explained 27-43% of the variance in stigmatization in the four dimensions resp. in the SIS-total score.
Conclusion: Stigmatization after cancer diagnosis was dependent of SES. Reasons may be fewer social and economic resources, lower health literacy and insufficient consideration of the specific needs of this patient group in the healthcare system.
Implication for cancer survivors: Patients with low SES should receive greater attention in the medical care system and in scientific research to identify and mitigate possible burdens and subsequent problems.
期刊介绍:
Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.