分析一个大型的、公开的在线强迫症同伴支持论坛的内容:主题分析。

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nora Yanyi Sun, Christopher Pittenger, Terence Ching
{"title":"分析一个大型的、公开的在线强迫症同伴支持论坛的内容:主题分析。","authors":"Nora Yanyi Sun, Christopher Pittenger, Terence Ching","doi":"10.2196/60899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating chronic anxiety disorder with low rates of remission. r/OCD is a peer support forum hosted by the Reddit website with over 180,000 users and 100-200 new posts daily. While peer support has been associated with improved treatment adherence and outcomes, online forums can also be an outlet for performing and accommodating compulsions (eg, seeking and receiving reassurance), which can ultimately exacerbate OCD.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to inductively assess what types of content are posted on r/OCD, an online peer support forum for individuals with OCD, to better understand the prevalent topics, dynamics, and norms of such online communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To describe the explicit content of the forum, 132 new posts with a total of 739 comments added to the subreddit within a 24-hour period from August 4, 2023, to August 5, 2023, were manually downloaded and coded using inductive thematic analysis. Though posts beyond the first 24 hours were downloaded, saturation of ideas was observed after the first 110 posts, and thus, no posts after the first 24 hours were included in the analysis. Through inductive thematic analysis, codes were organized into overarching themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main themes emerged during analysis: (1) validating OCD symptoms (n=69 total posts and comments), (2) connecting with peers with similar OCD themes (n=512), (3) coping with symptoms (n=280), and (4) sharing treatment experiences and advice (n=118). Many posts involved users describing their symptoms, questioning if a particular symptom was OCD, and asking other users if they had similar experiences. Users frequently categorized their OCD into subtypes using abbreviations (eg, \"ROCD\" [relationship OCD]) to seek others with similar experiences. A minority of posts solicited and provided advice on therapy and medication. Users were supportive and encouraging of each other's recovery journeys.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online peer support forum users demonstrated substantial knowledge of OCD and treatments; these forums enable users to receive social support and exchange helpful information and peer experiences related to seeking medical treatment. However, many users use the platform to connect with others experiencing similar subtypes of OCD or to seek confirmation that their symptoms are OCD, which is promoted by community norms and may suggest they are reassurance-seeking. Close moderation by health care professionals and restricting detailed sharing of OCD symptoms to prevent reassurance-seeking may be important for ensuring a net positive impact of online peer support forums for OCD. In addition, clinicians should consider if their patients may be reassurance-seeking on this and similar OCD forums, given their popularity. Future studies should conduct interviews with users and investigate patterns of user ability to further understand the potential harms and benefits of online peer support forums.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e60899"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the Contents of a Large, Public Online Peer Support Forum for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Thematic Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nora Yanyi Sun, Christopher Pittenger, Terence Ching\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/60899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating chronic anxiety disorder with low rates of remission. r/OCD is a peer support forum hosted by the Reddit website with over 180,000 users and 100-200 new posts daily. While peer support has been associated with improved treatment adherence and outcomes, online forums can also be an outlet for performing and accommodating compulsions (eg, seeking and receiving reassurance), which can ultimately exacerbate OCD.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to inductively assess what types of content are posted on r/OCD, an online peer support forum for individuals with OCD, to better understand the prevalent topics, dynamics, and norms of such online communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To describe the explicit content of the forum, 132 new posts with a total of 739 comments added to the subreddit within a 24-hour period from August 4, 2023, to August 5, 2023, were manually downloaded and coded using inductive thematic analysis. Though posts beyond the first 24 hours were downloaded, saturation of ideas was observed after the first 110 posts, and thus, no posts after the first 24 hours were included in the analysis. Through inductive thematic analysis, codes were organized into overarching themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main themes emerged during analysis: (1) validating OCD symptoms (n=69 total posts and comments), (2) connecting with peers with similar OCD themes (n=512), (3) coping with symptoms (n=280), and (4) sharing treatment experiences and advice (n=118). Many posts involved users describing their symptoms, questioning if a particular symptom was OCD, and asking other users if they had similar experiences. Users frequently categorized their OCD into subtypes using abbreviations (eg, \\\"ROCD\\\" [relationship OCD]) to seek others with similar experiences. A minority of posts solicited and provided advice on therapy and medication. Users were supportive and encouraging of each other's recovery journeys.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online peer support forum users demonstrated substantial knowledge of OCD and treatments; these forums enable users to receive social support and exchange helpful information and peer experiences related to seeking medical treatment. However, many users use the platform to connect with others experiencing similar subtypes of OCD or to seek confirmation that their symptoms are OCD, which is promoted by community norms and may suggest they are reassurance-seeking. Close moderation by health care professionals and restricting detailed sharing of OCD symptoms to prevent reassurance-seeking may be important for ensuring a net positive impact of online peer support forums for OCD. In addition, clinicians should consider if their patients may be reassurance-seeking on this and similar OCD forums, given their popularity. Future studies should conduct interviews with users and investigate patterns of user ability to further understand the potential harms and benefits of online peer support forums.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e60899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/60899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/60899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:强迫症(OCD)是一种使人衰弱的慢性焦虑障碍,缓解率低。r/OCD是一个同行支持论坛,由Reddit网站主办,拥有超过18万用户,每天有100-200个新帖子。虽然同伴支持与改善治疗依从性和结果有关,但在线论坛也可以成为表现和适应强迫行为(例如,寻求和接受安慰)的出口,这最终会加剧强迫症。目的:本研究旨在归纳评估强迫症患者在线同伴支持论坛r/OCD上发布的内容类型,以更好地了解此类在线社区的流行话题、动态和规范。方法:为了描述论坛的显性内容,人工下载了自2023年8月4日至2023年8月5日24小时内的132篇新帖子,共计739条评论,并采用归纳主题分析方法进行编码。虽然超过24小时的帖子被下载,但在前110个帖子之后观察到思想饱和,因此,前24小时之后的帖子没有被纳入分析。通过归纳主题分析,将代码组织成包罗万象的主题。结果:在分析过程中出现了四个主要主题:(1)验证强迫症症状(n=69),(2)与有类似强迫症主题的同龄人联系(n=512),(3)应对症状(n=280),(4)分享治疗经验和建议(n=118)。在许多帖子中,用户描述了他们的症状,质疑某种特定的症状是否是强迫症,并询问其他用户是否有类似的经历。用户经常使用缩写词(例如“ROCD”[关系强迫症])将他们的强迫症分类为子类型,以寻找有类似经历的人。少数帖子征求并提供治疗和药物方面的建议。用户支持和鼓励彼此的恢复之旅。结论:在线同伴支持论坛的用户表现出对强迫症和治疗的大量知识;这些论坛使用户能够获得社会支持,并交流与寻求医疗有关的有用信息和同行经验。然而,许多用户使用该平台与其他患有类似强迫症亚型的人联系,或者寻求确认他们的症状是强迫症,这是由社区规范促进的,可能表明他们在寻求安慰。医疗保健专业人员的严格节制和限制强迫症症状的详细分享,以防止寻求安慰,对于确保在线强迫症同伴支持论坛的净积极影响可能很重要。此外,临床医生应该考虑他们的病人是否可能在这个和类似的强迫症论坛上寻求安慰,因为它们很受欢迎。未来的研究应该对用户进行访谈,调查用户能力的模式,以进一步了解在线同伴支持论坛的潜在危害和益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing the Contents of a Large, Public Online Peer Support Forum for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Thematic Analysis.

Background: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating chronic anxiety disorder with low rates of remission. r/OCD is a peer support forum hosted by the Reddit website with over 180,000 users and 100-200 new posts daily. While peer support has been associated with improved treatment adherence and outcomes, online forums can also be an outlet for performing and accommodating compulsions (eg, seeking and receiving reassurance), which can ultimately exacerbate OCD.

Objective: This study aims to inductively assess what types of content are posted on r/OCD, an online peer support forum for individuals with OCD, to better understand the prevalent topics, dynamics, and norms of such online communities.

Methods: To describe the explicit content of the forum, 132 new posts with a total of 739 comments added to the subreddit within a 24-hour period from August 4, 2023, to August 5, 2023, were manually downloaded and coded using inductive thematic analysis. Though posts beyond the first 24 hours were downloaded, saturation of ideas was observed after the first 110 posts, and thus, no posts after the first 24 hours were included in the analysis. Through inductive thematic analysis, codes were organized into overarching themes.

Results: Four main themes emerged during analysis: (1) validating OCD symptoms (n=69 total posts and comments), (2) connecting with peers with similar OCD themes (n=512), (3) coping with symptoms (n=280), and (4) sharing treatment experiences and advice (n=118). Many posts involved users describing their symptoms, questioning if a particular symptom was OCD, and asking other users if they had similar experiences. Users frequently categorized their OCD into subtypes using abbreviations (eg, "ROCD" [relationship OCD]) to seek others with similar experiences. A minority of posts solicited and provided advice on therapy and medication. Users were supportive and encouraging of each other's recovery journeys.

Conclusions: Online peer support forum users demonstrated substantial knowledge of OCD and treatments; these forums enable users to receive social support and exchange helpful information and peer experiences related to seeking medical treatment. However, many users use the platform to connect with others experiencing similar subtypes of OCD or to seek confirmation that their symptoms are OCD, which is promoted by community norms and may suggest they are reassurance-seeking. Close moderation by health care professionals and restricting detailed sharing of OCD symptoms to prevent reassurance-seeking may be important for ensuring a net positive impact of online peer support forums for OCD. In addition, clinicians should consider if their patients may be reassurance-seeking on this and similar OCD forums, given their popularity. Future studies should conduct interviews with users and investigate patterns of user ability to further understand the potential harms and benefits of online peer support forums.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信