协同护理下肝硬化继发食管胃静脉曲张患者自我管理干预方案的制定与实施。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S514019
Ming Li, Xing-Er Xie, Xiangqing Qin, Tian Wu, Zhao-Lian Bian
{"title":"协同护理下肝硬化继发食管胃静脉曲张患者自我管理干预方案的制定与实施。","authors":"Ming Li, Xing-Er Xie, Xiangqing Qin, Tian Wu, Zhao-Lian Bian","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S514019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To design and evaluate a self-management intervention program tailored for patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for esophageal and gastric varices secondary to liver cirrhosis, implemented within a collaborative care framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The control group received standard inpatient care and discharge instructions, whereas the intervention group participated in the newly developed collaborative care program. Key outcomes, including self-management proficiency, medication adherence, quality of life, rebleeding rates, and unplanned readmissions within a three-month period, were compared between the two groups. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on disease severity using Child-Pugh scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention group demonstrated significantly higher scores in self-management proficiency compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Medication adherence was markedly better in the intervention group (P < 0.05), with a 95% adherence rate versus 76.92% in the control group. Quality of life assessments also revealed superior scores in the intervention group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the intervention group had significantly lower rates of unplanned readmissions (5.00% vs 20.51%, P < 0.05) and rebleeding (10.00% vs 30.77%, P < 0.05) compared to the control group. The 12-month survival rate was significantly higher in the intervention group (95.00% vs 79.49%, P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated that patients with more advanced disease benefited the most from the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of a self-management intervention program within a collaborative care framework significantly enhances self-management capabilities, medication adherence, and quality of life while reducing rebleeding rates, unplanned readmissions, and mortality in patients with esophageal and gastric varices secondary to liver cirrhosis. These findings underscore the importance of tailored self-management strategies, particularly for patients with advanced disease, and highlight the potential of collaborative care to address the complex needs of this population. This study provides a strong foundation for future research to optimize and scale similar interventions in diverse clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"2673-2686"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12105627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Implementation of a Self-Management Intervention Program for Patients with Esophageal and Gastric Varices Secondary to Liver Cirrhosis Under Collaborative Care.\",\"authors\":\"Ming Li, Xing-Er Xie, Xiangqing Qin, Tian Wu, Zhao-Lian Bian\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IJGM.S514019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To design and evaluate a self-management intervention program tailored for patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for esophageal and gastric varices secondary to liver cirrhosis, implemented within a collaborative care framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The control group received standard inpatient care and discharge instructions, whereas the intervention group participated in the newly developed collaborative care program. Key outcomes, including self-management proficiency, medication adherence, quality of life, rebleeding rates, and unplanned readmissions within a three-month period, were compared between the two groups. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on disease severity using Child-Pugh scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention group demonstrated significantly higher scores in self-management proficiency compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Medication adherence was markedly better in the intervention group (P < 0.05), with a 95% adherence rate versus 76.92% in the control group. Quality of life assessments also revealed superior scores in the intervention group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the intervention group had significantly lower rates of unplanned readmissions (5.00% vs 20.51%, P < 0.05) and rebleeding (10.00% vs 30.77%, P < 0.05) compared to the control group. The 12-month survival rate was significantly higher in the intervention group (95.00% vs 79.49%, P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated that patients with more advanced disease benefited the most from the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of a self-management intervention program within a collaborative care framework significantly enhances self-management capabilities, medication adherence, and quality of life while reducing rebleeding rates, unplanned readmissions, and mortality in patients with esophageal and gastric varices secondary to liver cirrhosis. These findings underscore the importance of tailored self-management strategies, particularly for patients with advanced disease, and highlight the potential of collaborative care to address the complex needs of this population. This study provides a strong foundation for future research to optimize and scale similar interventions in diverse clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2673-2686\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12105627/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S514019\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S514019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:设计和评估一种为接受内窥镜治疗的肝硬化继发性食管和胃静脉曲张患者量身定制的自我管理干预方案,并在协作护理框架内实施。方法:对照组接受标准的住院护理和出院指导,干预组参与新制定的协同护理方案。比较两组患者的主要结局,包括自我管理熟练程度、药物依从性、生活质量、再出血率和三个月内的意外再入院率。采用Child-Pugh评分,根据疾病严重程度进行亚组分析。结果:干预组自我管理能力得分显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。干预组患者的药物依从性明显优于对照组(P < 0.05),依从率为95%,对照组为76.92%。干预组患者生活质量评分高于对照组(P < 0.05)。干预组非计划再入院率(5.00% vs 20.51%, P < 0.05)和再出血率(10.00% vs 30.77%, P < 0.05)显著低于对照组。干预组12个月生存率显著高于对照组(95.00% vs 79.49%, P < 0.05)。亚组分析表明,疾病晚期的患者从干预中获益最多。结论:在协作护理框架下实施自我管理干预方案可显著提高自我管理能力、药物依从性和生活质量,同时降低肝硬化继发食管和胃静脉曲张患者的再出血率、计划外再入院率和死亡率。这些发现强调了量身定制的自我管理策略的重要性,特别是对于晚期疾病患者,并强调了协作护理的潜力,以解决这一人群的复杂需求。本研究为未来的研究提供了坚实的基础,以便在不同的临床环境中优化和扩大类似的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Implementation of a Self-Management Intervention Program for Patients with Esophageal and Gastric Varices Secondary to Liver Cirrhosis Under Collaborative Care.

Objective: To design and evaluate a self-management intervention program tailored for patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for esophageal and gastric varices secondary to liver cirrhosis, implemented within a collaborative care framework.

Methods: The control group received standard inpatient care and discharge instructions, whereas the intervention group participated in the newly developed collaborative care program. Key outcomes, including self-management proficiency, medication adherence, quality of life, rebleeding rates, and unplanned readmissions within a three-month period, were compared between the two groups. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on disease severity using Child-Pugh scores.

Results: The intervention group demonstrated significantly higher scores in self-management proficiency compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Medication adherence was markedly better in the intervention group (P < 0.05), with a 95% adherence rate versus 76.92% in the control group. Quality of life assessments also revealed superior scores in the intervention group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the intervention group had significantly lower rates of unplanned readmissions (5.00% vs 20.51%, P < 0.05) and rebleeding (10.00% vs 30.77%, P < 0.05) compared to the control group. The 12-month survival rate was significantly higher in the intervention group (95.00% vs 79.49%, P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated that patients with more advanced disease benefited the most from the intervention.

Conclusion: The implementation of a self-management intervention program within a collaborative care framework significantly enhances self-management capabilities, medication adherence, and quality of life while reducing rebleeding rates, unplanned readmissions, and mortality in patients with esophageal and gastric varices secondary to liver cirrhosis. These findings underscore the importance of tailored self-management strategies, particularly for patients with advanced disease, and highlight the potential of collaborative care to address the complex needs of this population. This study provides a strong foundation for future research to optimize and scale similar interventions in diverse clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信