数字眼疲劳综合征中双眼视觉和眼表评估工具的验证:desire研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maria João Barata, Pedro Aguiar, Andrzej Grzybowski, Carla Lança, André Moreira-Rosário
{"title":"数字眼疲劳综合征中双眼视觉和眼表评估工具的验证:desire研究。","authors":"Maria João Barata, Pedro Aguiar, Andrzej Grzybowski, Carla Lança, André Moreira-Rosário","doi":"10.3390/jpm15050168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: To understand if binocular vision disorders are associated with Digital Eye Strain Syndrome (DESS), a study protocol is needed to ensure consistency across observational studies. This study aims to test the feasibility of a protocol to assess DESS, screen time, binocular vision, and dry eye. <b>Methods:</b> DESIROUS is an observational cross-sectional study among Polytechnic students at the Lisbon School of Health Technology, Portugal. The protocol includes three questionnaires (Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire [CVS-Q], Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey [CISS], and Dry Eye Questionnaire version 5 [DEQ-5]), an assessment of visual acuity and binocular vision (cover test for near and distance, stereopsis, near point convergence (NPC), near point accommodation (NPA), accommodative facility, vergence), and the ocular surface break-up tear (BUT) test. The questionnaires were validated using Cronbach's alpha. Interobserver variability for BUT was assessed using Cohen's Kappa, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis involving three observers (A, B, and C), compared against an expert as the gold standard. <b>Results:</b> A total of 18 students were included in the validation phase (mean age: 21.50 ± 0.62 years; females: 77.8%). The internal consistency of the CVS-Q (α = 0.773) and the CISS (α = 0.756) was considered good, while the DEQ-5 showed a reasonable internal consistency (α = 0.594). Observer A had the highest agreement with the gold standard (Cohen's Kappa = 0.710 and <i>p</i> < 0.001; ICC = 0.924, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> We provide a protocol to assess binocular vision and the ocular surface, with an emphasis on objective measures while integrating other assessment approaches. Further studies are necessary to validate this protocol, potentially incorporating new measures to enhance its validity across different populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12112993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Binocular Vision and Ocular Surface Assessment Tools in Digital Eye Strain Syndrome: The DESIROUS Study.\",\"authors\":\"Maria João Barata, Pedro Aguiar, Andrzej Grzybowski, Carla Lança, André Moreira-Rosário\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jpm15050168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: To understand if binocular vision disorders are associated with Digital Eye Strain Syndrome (DESS), a study protocol is needed to ensure consistency across observational studies. This study aims to test the feasibility of a protocol to assess DESS, screen time, binocular vision, and dry eye. <b>Methods:</b> DESIROUS is an observational cross-sectional study among Polytechnic students at the Lisbon School of Health Technology, Portugal. The protocol includes three questionnaires (Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire [CVS-Q], Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey [CISS], and Dry Eye Questionnaire version 5 [DEQ-5]), an assessment of visual acuity and binocular vision (cover test for near and distance, stereopsis, near point convergence (NPC), near point accommodation (NPA), accommodative facility, vergence), and the ocular surface break-up tear (BUT) test. The questionnaires were validated using Cronbach's alpha. Interobserver variability for BUT was assessed using Cohen's Kappa, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis involving three observers (A, B, and C), compared against an expert as the gold standard. <b>Results:</b> A total of 18 students were included in the validation phase (mean age: 21.50 ± 0.62 years; females: 77.8%). The internal consistency of the CVS-Q (α = 0.773) and the CISS (α = 0.756) was considered good, while the DEQ-5 showed a reasonable internal consistency (α = 0.594). Observer A had the highest agreement with the gold standard (Cohen's Kappa = 0.710 and <i>p</i> < 0.001; ICC = 0.924, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> We provide a protocol to assess binocular vision and the ocular surface, with an emphasis on objective measures while integrating other assessment approaches. Further studies are necessary to validate this protocol, potentially incorporating new measures to enhance its validity across different populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12112993/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15050168\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15050168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了了解双眼视力障碍是否与数字眼疲劳综合征(DESS)相关,需要一项研究方案来确保观察性研究的一致性。本研究旨在测试一种评估DESS、屏幕时间、双眼视力和干眼的方案的可行性。方法:desire是一项在葡萄牙里斯本卫生技术学院的理工学生中进行的观察性横断面研究。该方案包括三份问卷(计算机视觉综合征问卷[CVS-Q]、会聚不全症状调查[CISS]和干眼问卷第5版[DEQ-5])、视力和双目视力评估(近距离覆盖测试、立体视觉、近点会聚(NPC)、近点调节(NPA)、调节设施、会聚)和眼表破裂撕裂(BUT)测试。问卷采用Cronbach's alpha进行验证。使用Cohen’s Kappa、类内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman分析(涉及三个观察者(A、B和C))来评估BUT的观察者间可变性,并将专家作为金标准进行比较。结果:共有18名学生进入验证期(平均年龄:21.50±0.62岁;女性:77.8%)。CVS-Q的内部一致性(α = 0.773)与CISS的内部一致性(α = 0.756)较好,DEQ-5的内部一致性较好(α = 0.594)。观察者A与黄金标准的一致性最高(Cohen’s Kappa = 0.710, p < 0.001;ICC = 0.924, p < 0.001)。结论:我们提供了一种评估双眼视力和眼表的方案,强调客观测量,同时整合其他评估方法。需要进一步的研究来验证这一方案,可能会纳入新的措施来提高其在不同人群中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of Binocular Vision and Ocular Surface Assessment Tools in Digital Eye Strain Syndrome: The DESIROUS Study.

Background: To understand if binocular vision disorders are associated with Digital Eye Strain Syndrome (DESS), a study protocol is needed to ensure consistency across observational studies. This study aims to test the feasibility of a protocol to assess DESS, screen time, binocular vision, and dry eye. Methods: DESIROUS is an observational cross-sectional study among Polytechnic students at the Lisbon School of Health Technology, Portugal. The protocol includes three questionnaires (Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire [CVS-Q], Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey [CISS], and Dry Eye Questionnaire version 5 [DEQ-5]), an assessment of visual acuity and binocular vision (cover test for near and distance, stereopsis, near point convergence (NPC), near point accommodation (NPA), accommodative facility, vergence), and the ocular surface break-up tear (BUT) test. The questionnaires were validated using Cronbach's alpha. Interobserver variability for BUT was assessed using Cohen's Kappa, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis involving three observers (A, B, and C), compared against an expert as the gold standard. Results: A total of 18 students were included in the validation phase (mean age: 21.50 ± 0.62 years; females: 77.8%). The internal consistency of the CVS-Q (α = 0.773) and the CISS (α = 0.756) was considered good, while the DEQ-5 showed a reasonable internal consistency (α = 0.594). Observer A had the highest agreement with the gold standard (Cohen's Kappa = 0.710 and p < 0.001; ICC = 0.924, p < 0.001). Conclusions: We provide a protocol to assess binocular vision and the ocular surface, with an emphasis on objective measures while integrating other assessment approaches. Further studies are necessary to validate this protocol, potentially incorporating new measures to enhance its validity across different populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信