基于智能感官评价系统的生、炸菖蒲的对比分析。

IF 3.4 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Metabolites Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI:10.3390/metabo15050338
Yingna Le, Zhongjian Yang, Ruiping Wang, Shaolong Ma, Yang Cui, Kun Shi, Li Xin, Jinlian Zhang, Lingyun Zhong
{"title":"基于智能感官评价系统的生、炸菖蒲的对比分析。","authors":"Yingna Le, Zhongjian Yang, Ruiping Wang, Shaolong Ma, Yang Cui, Kun Shi, Li Xin, Jinlian Zhang, Lingyun Zhong","doi":"10.3390/metabo15050338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The study aimed to investigate the differences in odor, color, and taste characteristics between raw and bran-fried <i>Acori tatarinowii Rhizoma</i> (RATR and BATR) using advanced sensory evaluation technologies. The objective was to establish a reliable differential analysis method for distinguishing RATR and BATR slices to support quality control in herbal processing. <b>Methods:</b> The Heracles NEO ultra-fast gas-phase electronic nose was employed to analyze odor profiles, while electronic eye and electronic tongue technologies were used to assess color and taste differences, respectively. Odor fingerprint analysis identified key volatile components, and colorimetric and taste measurements were conducted to compare RATR and BATR samples. <b>Results:</b> Fifteen characteristic odor components were identified, with methanol, 2-propanol, and 2-cyclopentenone potentially serving as discriminant markers differentiating RATR and BATR. PCA demonstrated exceptional separation efficacy, with a cumulative contribution rate of 99.937% for the primary components. <b>Conclusions:</b> The integration of Heracles NEO electronic nose, electronic eye, and electronic tongue technologies effectively distinguished RATR from BATR. This approach provides a novel strategy for online quality monitoring in herbal slice production and offers a robust analytical framework for the identification and quality assessment of processed herbal medicines.</p>","PeriodicalId":18496,"journal":{"name":"Metabolites","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of Raw and Bran-Fried <i>Acori tatarinowii Rhizoma</i> Based on the Intelligent Sensory Evaluation System.\",\"authors\":\"Yingna Le, Zhongjian Yang, Ruiping Wang, Shaolong Ma, Yang Cui, Kun Shi, Li Xin, Jinlian Zhang, Lingyun Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/metabo15050338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The study aimed to investigate the differences in odor, color, and taste characteristics between raw and bran-fried <i>Acori tatarinowii Rhizoma</i> (RATR and BATR) using advanced sensory evaluation technologies. The objective was to establish a reliable differential analysis method for distinguishing RATR and BATR slices to support quality control in herbal processing. <b>Methods:</b> The Heracles NEO ultra-fast gas-phase electronic nose was employed to analyze odor profiles, while electronic eye and electronic tongue technologies were used to assess color and taste differences, respectively. Odor fingerprint analysis identified key volatile components, and colorimetric and taste measurements were conducted to compare RATR and BATR samples. <b>Results:</b> Fifteen characteristic odor components were identified, with methanol, 2-propanol, and 2-cyclopentenone potentially serving as discriminant markers differentiating RATR and BATR. PCA demonstrated exceptional separation efficacy, with a cumulative contribution rate of 99.937% for the primary components. <b>Conclusions:</b> The integration of Heracles NEO electronic nose, electronic eye, and electronic tongue technologies effectively distinguished RATR from BATR. This approach provides a novel strategy for online quality monitoring in herbal slice production and offers a robust analytical framework for the identification and quality assessment of processed herbal medicines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metabolites\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113893/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metabolites\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15050338\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolites","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15050338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用先进的感官评价技术,研究生、煎炸青果的气味、颜色和口感特征的差异。目的是建立一种可靠的鉴别RATR和BATR饮片的鉴别分析方法,以支持中药炮制过程中的质量控制。方法:采用Heracles NEO超快速气相电子鼻分析气味特征,采用电子眼和电子舌技术分别评估颜色和味觉差异。气味指纹分析确定了关键挥发性成分,并进行了比色和味道测量来比较RATR和BATR样品。结果:鉴定出15种特征气味成分,其中甲醇、2-丙醇和2-环戊酮可能是区分RATR和BATR的鉴别标记。主成分分析显示出较好的分离效果,对主成分的累积贡献率达99.937%。结论:整合Heracles NEO电子鼻、电子眼和电子舌技术,可有效区分RATR和BATR。该方法为草药片生产中的在线质量监测提供了一种新颖的策略,并为加工草药的鉴定和质量评估提供了一个强大的分析框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Analysis of Raw and Bran-Fried Acori tatarinowii Rhizoma Based on the Intelligent Sensory Evaluation System.

Objectives: The study aimed to investigate the differences in odor, color, and taste characteristics between raw and bran-fried Acori tatarinowii Rhizoma (RATR and BATR) using advanced sensory evaluation technologies. The objective was to establish a reliable differential analysis method for distinguishing RATR and BATR slices to support quality control in herbal processing. Methods: The Heracles NEO ultra-fast gas-phase electronic nose was employed to analyze odor profiles, while electronic eye and electronic tongue technologies were used to assess color and taste differences, respectively. Odor fingerprint analysis identified key volatile components, and colorimetric and taste measurements were conducted to compare RATR and BATR samples. Results: Fifteen characteristic odor components were identified, with methanol, 2-propanol, and 2-cyclopentenone potentially serving as discriminant markers differentiating RATR and BATR. PCA demonstrated exceptional separation efficacy, with a cumulative contribution rate of 99.937% for the primary components. Conclusions: The integration of Heracles NEO electronic nose, electronic eye, and electronic tongue technologies effectively distinguished RATR from BATR. This approach provides a novel strategy for online quality monitoring in herbal slice production and offers a robust analytical framework for the identification and quality assessment of processed herbal medicines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Metabolites
Metabolites Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1070
审稿时长
17.17 days
期刊介绍: Metabolites (ISSN 2218-1989) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of metabolism and metabolomics. Metabolites publishes original research articles and review articles in all molecular aspects of metabolism relevant to the fields of metabolomics, metabolic biochemistry, computational and systems biology, biotechnology and medicine, with a particular focus on the biological roles of metabolites and small molecule biomarkers. Metabolites encourages scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on article length. Sufficient experimental details must be provided to enable the results to be accurately reproduced. Electronic material representing additional figures, materials and methods explanation, or supporting results and evidence can be submitted with the main manuscript as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信