重新评估错配修复缺陷结直肠癌淋巴结转移的预后价值。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Zilan Ye, Dakui Luo, Fan Chen, Jiayu Chen, Zezhi Shan, Junyong Weng, Yu Zhang, Qingguo Li, Xinxiang Li
{"title":"重新评估错配修复缺陷结直肠癌淋巴结转移的预后价值。","authors":"Zilan Ye, Dakui Luo, Fan Chen, Jiayu Chen, Zezhi Shan, Junyong Weng, Yu Zhang, Qingguo Li, Xinxiang Li","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32050254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In non-metastatic deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC), traditional prognostic factors, such as pN staging, often fail to distinguish patient outcomes effectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included a cohort of 792 dMMR CRC patients who underwent surgical treatment without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or immunotherapy. Traditional prognostic factors were compared with lymph node-based models (NLN, LNR, LOODS) for their ability to predict overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study demonstrated that traditional factors, such as histologic type, differentiation, and vascular invasion, had limited predictive value in dMMR CRC. Furthermore, the pN stage failed to effectively distinguish between pN1 and pN2 for both OS (<i>p =</i> 0.219) and DFS (<i>p =</i> 0.095). Conversely, LOODS demonstrated superior performance over traditional pN staging in predicting both OS and DFS (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A prognostic model combining LOODS with age exhibited superior predictive performance compared with the traditional TN staging system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LOODS was identified as a more effective independent prognostic factor compared with traditional pN staging, enabling more precise stratification of pN+ patients in non-metastatic dMMR CRC, highlighting its potential utility in guiding postoperative treatment and optimizing therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reassessing the Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Metastasis in Deficient Mismatch Repair Colorectal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Zilan Ye, Dakui Luo, Fan Chen, Jiayu Chen, Zezhi Shan, Junyong Weng, Yu Zhang, Qingguo Li, Xinxiang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32050254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In non-metastatic deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC), traditional prognostic factors, such as pN staging, often fail to distinguish patient outcomes effectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included a cohort of 792 dMMR CRC patients who underwent surgical treatment without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or immunotherapy. Traditional prognostic factors were compared with lymph node-based models (NLN, LNR, LOODS) for their ability to predict overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study demonstrated that traditional factors, such as histologic type, differentiation, and vascular invasion, had limited predictive value in dMMR CRC. Furthermore, the pN stage failed to effectively distinguish between pN1 and pN2 for both OS (<i>p =</i> 0.219) and DFS (<i>p =</i> 0.095). Conversely, LOODS demonstrated superior performance over traditional pN staging in predicting both OS and DFS (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A prognostic model combining LOODS with age exhibited superior predictive performance compared with the traditional TN staging system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LOODS was identified as a more effective independent prognostic factor compared with traditional pN staging, enabling more precise stratification of pN+ patients in non-metastatic dMMR CRC, highlighting its potential utility in guiding postoperative treatment and optimizing therapeutic strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110690/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32050254\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32050254","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在非转移性缺陷错配修复(dMMR)结直肠癌(CRC)中,传统的预后因素,如pN分期,往往不能有效地区分患者的预后。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了792例接受手术治疗的dMMR结直肠癌患者,这些患者未接受新辅助放化疗或免疫治疗。将传统预后因素与基于淋巴结的模型(NLN, LNR, LOODS)进行比较,以预测总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)的能力。结果:研究表明,传统的因素,如组织学类型、分化和血管侵犯,对dMMR CRC的预测价值有限。此外,在OS (p = 0.219)和DFS (p = 0.095)中,pN分期未能有效区分pN1和pN2。相反,lods在预测OS和DFS方面表现出优于传统pN分期的性能(p < 0.001)。与传统的TN分期系统相比,将lods与年龄相结合的预后模型具有更好的预测性能。结论:与传统的pN分期相比,LOODS被认为是一个更有效的独立预后因素,可以更精确地对非转移性dMMR CRC的pN+患者进行分层,突出其在指导术后治疗和优化治疗策略方面的潜在应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reassessing the Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Metastasis in Deficient Mismatch Repair Colorectal Cancer.

Background: In non-metastatic deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC), traditional prognostic factors, such as pN staging, often fail to distinguish patient outcomes effectively.

Methods: This retrospective study included a cohort of 792 dMMR CRC patients who underwent surgical treatment without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or immunotherapy. Traditional prognostic factors were compared with lymph node-based models (NLN, LNR, LOODS) for their ability to predict overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results: The study demonstrated that traditional factors, such as histologic type, differentiation, and vascular invasion, had limited predictive value in dMMR CRC. Furthermore, the pN stage failed to effectively distinguish between pN1 and pN2 for both OS (p = 0.219) and DFS (p = 0.095). Conversely, LOODS demonstrated superior performance over traditional pN staging in predicting both OS and DFS (p < 0.001). A prognostic model combining LOODS with age exhibited superior predictive performance compared with the traditional TN staging system.

Conclusions: LOODS was identified as a more effective independent prognostic factor compared with traditional pN staging, enabling more precise stratification of pN+ patients in non-metastatic dMMR CRC, highlighting its potential utility in guiding postoperative treatment and optimizing therapeutic strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信