{"title":"离散统一气体动力学格式通量求解方法的比较研究。","authors":"Wenqiang Guo","doi":"10.3390/e27050528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this work, the Simpson method is proposed to calculate the interface flux of a discrete unified gas kinetic scheme (DUGKS) according to the distribution function at the node and the midpoint of the interface, which is noted by Simpson-DUGKS. Moreover, the optimized DUGKS and Simpson-DUGKS considering the force term are derived. Then, the original DUGKS, optimized DUGKS, and Simpson-DUGKS are compared and analyzed in theory. Finally, the numerical tests are performed under different grid numbers (<i>N</i>). In the steady unidirectional flow (Couette flow and Poiseuille flow), the three methods are stable under different Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) numbers, and the calculated <i>L</i><sub>2</sub> errors are the same. In the Taylor-Green vortex flow, the <i>L</i><sub>2</sub> error of the optimized DUGKS is the smallest with respect to the analytical solution of velocity, but the <i>L</i><sub>2</sub> error of the optimized DUGKS is the largest with respect to the analytical solution of density. In the lid-driven cavity flow, the results of the optimized DUGKS deviate more from the reference results in terms of accuracy, especially in the case of a small grid number. In terms of computational efficiency, it should be noted that the computational time of optimized DUGKS increases by about 40% compared with the original DUGKS when CFL = 0.1 and <i>N</i> = 16, and the calculation time of Simpson-DUGKS is reduced by about 59% compared with the original DUGKS when CFL = 0.95 and <i>N</i> = 16.</p>","PeriodicalId":11694,"journal":{"name":"Entropy","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study on Flux Solution Methods of Discrete Unified Gas Kinetic Scheme.\",\"authors\":\"Wenqiang Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/e27050528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this work, the Simpson method is proposed to calculate the interface flux of a discrete unified gas kinetic scheme (DUGKS) according to the distribution function at the node and the midpoint of the interface, which is noted by Simpson-DUGKS. Moreover, the optimized DUGKS and Simpson-DUGKS considering the force term are derived. Then, the original DUGKS, optimized DUGKS, and Simpson-DUGKS are compared and analyzed in theory. Finally, the numerical tests are performed under different grid numbers (<i>N</i>). In the steady unidirectional flow (Couette flow and Poiseuille flow), the three methods are stable under different Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) numbers, and the calculated <i>L</i><sub>2</sub> errors are the same. In the Taylor-Green vortex flow, the <i>L</i><sub>2</sub> error of the optimized DUGKS is the smallest with respect to the analytical solution of velocity, but the <i>L</i><sub>2</sub> error of the optimized DUGKS is the largest with respect to the analytical solution of density. In the lid-driven cavity flow, the results of the optimized DUGKS deviate more from the reference results in terms of accuracy, especially in the case of a small grid number. In terms of computational efficiency, it should be noted that the computational time of optimized DUGKS increases by about 40% compared with the original DUGKS when CFL = 0.1 and <i>N</i> = 16, and the calculation time of Simpson-DUGKS is reduced by about 59% compared with the original DUGKS when CFL = 0.95 and <i>N</i> = 16.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Entropy\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Entropy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/e27050528\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entropy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/e27050528","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文提出了采用Simpson-DUGKS方法计算离散统一气体动力学格式(DUGKS)界面通量的方法,该方法根据界面节点和中点的分布函数进行计算。并推导了考虑力项的优化DUGKS和Simpson-DUGKS。然后对原始DUGKS、优化DUGKS和Simpson-DUGKS进行了理论比较和分析。最后,在不同网格数(N)下进行了数值试验。在稳定的单向流动(Couette流和Poiseuille流)中,三种方法在不同的CFL数下都是稳定的,并且计算出的L2误差相同。在Taylor-Green涡旋中,优化后的DUGKS相对于速度解析解的L2误差最小,但相对于密度解析解的L2误差最大。在盖驱动的空腔流动中,优化后的DUGKS计算结果在精度上与参考结果偏差较大,特别是在网格数较小的情况下。在计算效率方面,需要注意的是,当CFL = 0.1, N = 16时,优化后DUGKS的计算时间比原DUGKS增加了约40%,当CFL = 0.95, N = 16时,Simpson-DUGKS的计算时间比原DUGKS减少了约59%。
Comparative Study on Flux Solution Methods of Discrete Unified Gas Kinetic Scheme.
In this work, the Simpson method is proposed to calculate the interface flux of a discrete unified gas kinetic scheme (DUGKS) according to the distribution function at the node and the midpoint of the interface, which is noted by Simpson-DUGKS. Moreover, the optimized DUGKS and Simpson-DUGKS considering the force term are derived. Then, the original DUGKS, optimized DUGKS, and Simpson-DUGKS are compared and analyzed in theory. Finally, the numerical tests are performed under different grid numbers (N). In the steady unidirectional flow (Couette flow and Poiseuille flow), the three methods are stable under different Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) numbers, and the calculated L2 errors are the same. In the Taylor-Green vortex flow, the L2 error of the optimized DUGKS is the smallest with respect to the analytical solution of velocity, but the L2 error of the optimized DUGKS is the largest with respect to the analytical solution of density. In the lid-driven cavity flow, the results of the optimized DUGKS deviate more from the reference results in terms of accuracy, especially in the case of a small grid number. In terms of computational efficiency, it should be noted that the computational time of optimized DUGKS increases by about 40% compared with the original DUGKS when CFL = 0.1 and N = 16, and the calculation time of Simpson-DUGKS is reduced by about 59% compared with the original DUGKS when CFL = 0.95 and N = 16.
期刊介绍:
Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300), an international and interdisciplinary journal of entropy and information studies, publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish as much as possible their theoretical and experimental details. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. If there are computation and the experiment, the details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.