术中改善桡骨支气管内超声显像能提高周围肺病变的诊断率吗?

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Kazuki Nishida, Takayasu Ito, Shingo Iwano, Shotaro Okachi, Shota Nakamura, Basile Chrétien, Toyofumi Fengshi Chen-Yoshikawa, Makoto Ishii
{"title":"术中改善桡骨支气管内超声显像能提高周围肺病变的诊断率吗?","authors":"Kazuki Nishida, Takayasu Ito, Shingo Iwano, Shotaro Okachi, Shota Nakamura, Basile Chrétien, Toyofumi Fengshi Chen-Yoshikawa, Makoto Ishii","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03725-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data regarding the diagnostic efficacy of radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) findings obtained via transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA)/biopsy (TBB) with endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) for peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) are lacking. We evaluated whether intraoperative probe repositioning improves R-EBUS imaging and affects diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-guided sampling for PPLs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied 363 patients with PPLs who underwent TBNA/TBB (83 lesions) or TBB (280 lesions) using EBUS-GS. Based on the R-EBUS findings before and after these procedures, patients were categorized into three groups: the improved R-EBUS image (n = 52), unimproved R-EBUS image (n = 69), and initial within-lesion groups (n = 242). The impact of improved R-EBUS findings on diagnostic yield and complications was assessed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for lesion size, lesion location, and the presence of a bronchus leading to the lesion on CT. A separate exploratory random-forest model with SHAP analysis was used to explore factors associated with successful repositioning in lesions not initially \"within.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The diagnostic yield in the improved R-EBUS group was significantly higher than that in the unimproved R-EBUS group (76.9% vs. 46.4%, p = 0.001). The regression model revealed that the improvement in intraoperative R-EBUS findings was associated with a high diagnostic yield (odds ratio: 3.55, 95% confidence interval, 1.57-8.06, p = 0.002). Machine learning analysis indicated that inner lesion location and radiographic visibility were the most influential predictors of successful repositioning. The complication rates were similar across all groups (total complications: 5.8% vs. 4.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.943).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improved R-EBUS findings during TBNA/TBB or TBB with EBUS-GS were associated with a high diagnostic yield without an increase in complications, even when the initial R-EBUS findings were inadequate. This suggests that repeated intraoperative probe repositioning can safely boost outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"261"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12105327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can intraoperative improvement of radial endobronchial ultrasound imaging enhance the diagnostic yield in peripheral pulmonary lesions?\",\"authors\":\"Kazuki Nishida, Takayasu Ito, Shingo Iwano, Shotaro Okachi, Shota Nakamura, Basile Chrétien, Toyofumi Fengshi Chen-Yoshikawa, Makoto Ishii\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12890-025-03725-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data regarding the diagnostic efficacy of radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) findings obtained via transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA)/biopsy (TBB) with endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) for peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) are lacking. We evaluated whether intraoperative probe repositioning improves R-EBUS imaging and affects diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-guided sampling for PPLs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied 363 patients with PPLs who underwent TBNA/TBB (83 lesions) or TBB (280 lesions) using EBUS-GS. Based on the R-EBUS findings before and after these procedures, patients were categorized into three groups: the improved R-EBUS image (n = 52), unimproved R-EBUS image (n = 69), and initial within-lesion groups (n = 242). The impact of improved R-EBUS findings on diagnostic yield and complications was assessed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for lesion size, lesion location, and the presence of a bronchus leading to the lesion on CT. A separate exploratory random-forest model with SHAP analysis was used to explore factors associated with successful repositioning in lesions not initially \\\"within.\\\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The diagnostic yield in the improved R-EBUS group was significantly higher than that in the unimproved R-EBUS group (76.9% vs. 46.4%, p = 0.001). The regression model revealed that the improvement in intraoperative R-EBUS findings was associated with a high diagnostic yield (odds ratio: 3.55, 95% confidence interval, 1.57-8.06, p = 0.002). Machine learning analysis indicated that inner lesion location and radiographic visibility were the most influential predictors of successful repositioning. The complication rates were similar across all groups (total complications: 5.8% vs. 4.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.943).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improved R-EBUS findings during TBNA/TBB or TBB with EBUS-GS were associated with a high diagnostic yield without an increase in complications, even when the initial R-EBUS findings were inadequate. This suggests that repeated intraoperative probe repositioning can safely boost outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12105327/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03725-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03725-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于经支气管针吸(TBNA)/活检(TBB)与支气管超声引导鞘(EBUS-GS)获得的桡骨支气管超声(R-EBUS)对周围性肺病变(ppl)的诊断效果的数据缺乏。我们评估术中探针重新定位是否能改善R-EBUS成像,并影响ebus引导下ppl取样的诊出率和安全性。方法:我们回顾性研究了363例ppl患者,他们接受了TBNA/TBB(83个病灶)或TBB(280个病灶),使用EBUS-GS。根据手术前后的R-EBUS检查结果,将患者分为三组:改善的R-EBUS图像组(n = 52)、未改善的R-EBUS图像组(n = 69)和初始病变内组(n = 242)。改善R-EBUS检查结果对诊断率和并发症的影响采用多变量logistic回归进行评估,调整病变大小、病变位置和CT上是否存在导致病变的支气管。一个单独的探索性随机森林模型与SHAP分析被用于探索病变成功重新定位的相关因素,而不是最初的“内部”。结果:改良R-EBUS组的诊断率显著高于未改良R-EBUS组(76.9% vs. 46.4%, p = 0.001)。回归模型显示术中R-EBUS检查结果的改善与高诊断率相关(优势比:3.55,95%可信区间,1.57-8.06,p = 0.002)。机器学习分析表明,内部病变位置和影像学可见性是成功重新定位的最具影响力的预测因素。两组并发症发生率相似(总并发症:5.8% vs. 4.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.943)。结论:TBNA/TBB或TBB合并EBUS-GS时R-EBUS结果的改善与高诊断率相关,而不会增加并发症,即使最初的R-EBUS结果不充分。这表明术中反复重新定位探针可以安全地提高预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can intraoperative improvement of radial endobronchial ultrasound imaging enhance the diagnostic yield in peripheral pulmonary lesions?

Background: Data regarding the diagnostic efficacy of radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) findings obtained via transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA)/biopsy (TBB) with endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) for peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) are lacking. We evaluated whether intraoperative probe repositioning improves R-EBUS imaging and affects diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-guided sampling for PPLs.

Methods: We retrospectively studied 363 patients with PPLs who underwent TBNA/TBB (83 lesions) or TBB (280 lesions) using EBUS-GS. Based on the R-EBUS findings before and after these procedures, patients were categorized into three groups: the improved R-EBUS image (n = 52), unimproved R-EBUS image (n = 69), and initial within-lesion groups (n = 242). The impact of improved R-EBUS findings on diagnostic yield and complications was assessed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for lesion size, lesion location, and the presence of a bronchus leading to the lesion on CT. A separate exploratory random-forest model with SHAP analysis was used to explore factors associated with successful repositioning in lesions not initially "within."

Results: The diagnostic yield in the improved R-EBUS group was significantly higher than that in the unimproved R-EBUS group (76.9% vs. 46.4%, p = 0.001). The regression model revealed that the improvement in intraoperative R-EBUS findings was associated with a high diagnostic yield (odds ratio: 3.55, 95% confidence interval, 1.57-8.06, p = 0.002). Machine learning analysis indicated that inner lesion location and radiographic visibility were the most influential predictors of successful repositioning. The complication rates were similar across all groups (total complications: 5.8% vs. 4.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.943).

Conclusions: Improved R-EBUS findings during TBNA/TBB or TBB with EBUS-GS were associated with a high diagnostic yield without an increase in complications, even when the initial R-EBUS findings were inadequate. This suggests that repeated intraoperative probe repositioning can safely boost outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信