德语牙科忽视量表的效度和信度。

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Katharina Marilena Weil, Theresa Marie Weßlau, Laura Agnes Ingrid Magerfleisch, Hannah Tröger, Lisa Irmscher, David Bantel, Clara Theres Meyer-Probst, Katja Petrowski, Hendrik Berth
{"title":"德语牙科忽视量表的效度和信度。","authors":"Katharina Marilena Weil, Theresa Marie Weßlau, Laura Agnes Ingrid Magerfleisch, Hannah Tröger, Lisa Irmscher, David Bantel, Clara Theres Meyer-Probst, Katja Petrowski, Hendrik Berth","doi":"10.3390/dj13050225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The Dental Neglect Scale (DNS) is known and used to evaluate and assess adult behaviors and attitudes related to oral self-care and oral-health. In English-speaking countries, the DNS has been used in many studies. At the moment, there is no validated version of the DNS that is available in the German language. The aim of this study is to validate a German version of the DNS to evaluate and assess the oral health and behavior among the German population. <b>Methods:</b> The study population consisted of N = 311 German adults (180 female, 130 male, 1 diverse) aged from 18 to 90 years from a dental clinic in Germany. The participants answered a questionnaire. In addition to questions on their socio-demographic background and the DNS, the survey included more standardized instruments relating to preventive behavior, dental anxiety, and oral health. <b>Results:</b> The DNS was translated into German. An explanatory factor analysis was conducted, which supported the unifactorial structure of the scale. The following results were obtained for the reliability of the resulting DNS: Cronbach's Alpha = 0.710, McDonald's Omega = 0.711, and Mean = 25.63 (SD = 4.02, Range 12-30). Convergent and divergent validity were demonstrated through associations between the DNS and various oral health scales, and by differences between genders and age groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study confirms the quality of the criteria of the DNS for German adults. The DNS is a convincing instrument that is used for epidemiological studies in the field of dentistry and psychology. Further validation with other samples should be conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12109848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of the Dental Neglect Scale in German.\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Marilena Weil, Theresa Marie Weßlau, Laura Agnes Ingrid Magerfleisch, Hannah Tröger, Lisa Irmscher, David Bantel, Clara Theres Meyer-Probst, Katja Petrowski, Hendrik Berth\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj13050225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The Dental Neglect Scale (DNS) is known and used to evaluate and assess adult behaviors and attitudes related to oral self-care and oral-health. In English-speaking countries, the DNS has been used in many studies. At the moment, there is no validated version of the DNS that is available in the German language. The aim of this study is to validate a German version of the DNS to evaluate and assess the oral health and behavior among the German population. <b>Methods:</b> The study population consisted of N = 311 German adults (180 female, 130 male, 1 diverse) aged from 18 to 90 years from a dental clinic in Germany. The participants answered a questionnaire. In addition to questions on their socio-demographic background and the DNS, the survey included more standardized instruments relating to preventive behavior, dental anxiety, and oral health. <b>Results:</b> The DNS was translated into German. An explanatory factor analysis was conducted, which supported the unifactorial structure of the scale. The following results were obtained for the reliability of the resulting DNS: Cronbach's Alpha = 0.710, McDonald's Omega = 0.711, and Mean = 25.63 (SD = 4.02, Range 12-30). Convergent and divergent validity were demonstrated through associations between the DNS and various oral health scales, and by differences between genders and age groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study confirms the quality of the criteria of the DNS for German adults. The DNS is a convincing instrument that is used for epidemiological studies in the field of dentistry and psychology. Further validation with other samples should be conducted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12109848/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13050225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13050225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:牙科忽视量表(DNS)是已知的,用于评估和评估成人有关口腔自我保健和口腔健康的行为和态度。在英语国家,DNS已被用于许多研究。目前,还没有经过验证的德语DNS版本可用。本研究的目的是验证德语版的口腔健康问卷,以评估和评估德国人群的口腔健康和行为。方法:研究人群包括来自德国一家牙科诊所的年龄在18岁至90岁之间的311名德国成年人(180名女性,130名男性,1名男性)。参与者回答了一份问卷。除了关于他们的社会人口背景和DNS的问题外,调查还包括与预防行为、牙齿焦虑和口腔健康有关的更标准化的工具。结果:DNS翻译成德文。进行了解释因子分析,支持量表的单因子结构。所得DNS的信度结果如下:Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.710, McDonald’s Omega = 0.711, Mean = 25.63 (SD = 4.02,范围12-30)。通过DNS与各种口腔健康量表之间的关联以及性别和年龄组之间的差异,证明了趋同效度和发散效度。结论:本研究证实了德国成人DNS标准的质量。DNS是一种令人信服的工具,用于牙科和心理学领域的流行病学研究。应与其他样品进行进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and Reliability of the Dental Neglect Scale in German.

Background/Objectives: The Dental Neglect Scale (DNS) is known and used to evaluate and assess adult behaviors and attitudes related to oral self-care and oral-health. In English-speaking countries, the DNS has been used in many studies. At the moment, there is no validated version of the DNS that is available in the German language. The aim of this study is to validate a German version of the DNS to evaluate and assess the oral health and behavior among the German population. Methods: The study population consisted of N = 311 German adults (180 female, 130 male, 1 diverse) aged from 18 to 90 years from a dental clinic in Germany. The participants answered a questionnaire. In addition to questions on their socio-demographic background and the DNS, the survey included more standardized instruments relating to preventive behavior, dental anxiety, and oral health. Results: The DNS was translated into German. An explanatory factor analysis was conducted, which supported the unifactorial structure of the scale. The following results were obtained for the reliability of the resulting DNS: Cronbach's Alpha = 0.710, McDonald's Omega = 0.711, and Mean = 25.63 (SD = 4.02, Range 12-30). Convergent and divergent validity were demonstrated through associations between the DNS and various oral health scales, and by differences between genders and age groups. Conclusions: This study confirms the quality of the criteria of the DNS for German adults. The DNS is a convincing instrument that is used for epidemiological studies in the field of dentistry and psychology. Further validation with other samples should be conducted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信