在综合性癌症中心实施整合肿瘤学途径:专家见解和观点。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Current Opinion in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1097/CCO.0000000000001150
Marie-Aline Echterbille, Florence Horicks, Jennifer Dhont, Virginie De Wilde
{"title":"在综合性癌症中心实施整合肿瘤学途径:专家见解和观点。","authors":"Marie-Aline Echterbille, Florence Horicks, Jennifer Dhont, Virginie De Wilde","doi":"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Integrative oncology (IO) has evolved into an evidence-informed discipline endorsed by major oncology organizations. However, integrating IO into standard oncology care remains a challenge, often dependent on institutional culture and provider attitudes. This exploratory pilot study aimed to assess healthcare professionals' (HCPs) knowledge, communication practices, perceived needs, and perspectives regarding IO in a Belgian Comprehensive Cancer Center with no preexisting IO pathway.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Among the 33 participants, 45% understood IO as a patient-centered approach, while 88% acknowledged complementarity to conventional medicine. However, 24% found its definition unclear. Physician-patient communication remains challenging, with 48% of HCPs believing patients hesitate to discuss IO. Key needs include training (88%), standardized communication tools (45%), and a directory of recommended therapists (94%). The interviews facilitated a shift in perception, with 55% of HCPs expressing increased willingness to engage in IO initiatives.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Successfully integrating IO requires tailored training, specialized referents, and a well structured care pathway. The observed shift in mindset among HCPs highlights the importance of awareness and collaborative solution-building for effective IO adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":10893,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"283-289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing an integrative oncology pathway in a comprehensive cancer center: expert insights and perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Aline Echterbille, Florence Horicks, Jennifer Dhont, Virginie De Wilde\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Integrative oncology (IO) has evolved into an evidence-informed discipline endorsed by major oncology organizations. However, integrating IO into standard oncology care remains a challenge, often dependent on institutional culture and provider attitudes. This exploratory pilot study aimed to assess healthcare professionals' (HCPs) knowledge, communication practices, perceived needs, and perspectives regarding IO in a Belgian Comprehensive Cancer Center with no preexisting IO pathway.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Among the 33 participants, 45% understood IO as a patient-centered approach, while 88% acknowledged complementarity to conventional medicine. However, 24% found its definition unclear. Physician-patient communication remains challenging, with 48% of HCPs believing patients hesitate to discuss IO. Key needs include training (88%), standardized communication tools (45%), and a directory of recommended therapists (94%). The interviews facilitated a shift in perception, with 55% of HCPs expressing increased willingness to engage in IO initiatives.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Successfully integrating IO requires tailored training, specialized referents, and a well structured care pathway. The observed shift in mindset among HCPs highlights the importance of awareness and collaborative solution-building for effective IO adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"283-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001150\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:综合肿瘤学(IO)已经发展成为一门由主要肿瘤组织认可的循证学科。然而,将IO纳入标准肿瘤治疗仍然是一个挑战,通常取决于机构文化和提供者的态度。本探索性试点研究旨在评估比利时综合癌症中心医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)的知识、沟通实践、感知需求和关于IO的观点,该中心没有预先存在的IO途径。最近的发现:在33名参与者中,45%的人认为IO是一种以患者为中心的方法,而88%的人认为IO是传统医学的补充。然而,24%的人认为其定义不明确。医患沟通仍然具有挑战性,48%的HCPs认为患者对讨论IO犹豫不决。主要需求包括培训(88%)、标准化沟通工具(45%)和推荐治疗师目录(94%)。访谈促进了观念的转变,55%的hcp表示更愿意参与IO计划。总结:成功整合IO需要量身定制的培训、专门的参考对象和结构良好的护理途径。在医疗保健提供者中观察到的思维转变突出了意识和协作解决方案构建对于有效采用IO的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing an integrative oncology pathway in a comprehensive cancer center: expert insights and perspectives.

Purpose of review: Integrative oncology (IO) has evolved into an evidence-informed discipline endorsed by major oncology organizations. However, integrating IO into standard oncology care remains a challenge, often dependent on institutional culture and provider attitudes. This exploratory pilot study aimed to assess healthcare professionals' (HCPs) knowledge, communication practices, perceived needs, and perspectives regarding IO in a Belgian Comprehensive Cancer Center with no preexisting IO pathway.

Recent findings: Among the 33 participants, 45% understood IO as a patient-centered approach, while 88% acknowledged complementarity to conventional medicine. However, 24% found its definition unclear. Physician-patient communication remains challenging, with 48% of HCPs believing patients hesitate to discuss IO. Key needs include training (88%), standardized communication tools (45%), and a directory of recommended therapists (94%). The interviews facilitated a shift in perception, with 55% of HCPs expressing increased willingness to engage in IO initiatives.

Summary: Successfully integrating IO requires tailored training, specialized referents, and a well structured care pathway. The observed shift in mindset among HCPs highlights the importance of awareness and collaborative solution-building for effective IO adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Oncology
Current Opinion in Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With its easy-to-digest reviews on important advances in world literature, Current Opinion in Oncology offers expert evaluation on a wide range of topics from sixteen key disciplines including sarcomas, cancer biology, melanoma and endocrine tumors. Published bimonthly, each issue covers in detail the most pertinent advances in these fields from the previous year. This is supplemented by annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信