双盲安慰剂对照研究比较尼妥吡坦加奥氮平治疗前后预防大剂量顺铂诱导的恶心/呕吐

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Chanida Vinayanuwattikun, Chalermchai Lertanansit, Wasamol Mahaparn, Attapol Chotirut, Nicha Zungsontiporn, Suleepon Uttamapinan, Nattaya Sintawichai, Piyada Sitthideatphaiboon, Virote Sriuranpong, Suebpong Tanasanvimon
{"title":"双盲安慰剂对照研究比较尼妥吡坦加奥氮平治疗前后预防大剂量顺铂诱导的恶心/呕吐","authors":"Chanida Vinayanuwattikun, Chalermchai Lertanansit, Wasamol Mahaparn, Attapol Chotirut, Nicha Zungsontiporn, Suleepon Uttamapinan, Nattaya Sintawichai, Piyada Sitthideatphaiboon, Virote Sriuranpong, Suebpong Tanasanvimon","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Addition of olanzapine to NK-1 receptor antagonist regimen improves chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) prevention for highly emetogenic chemotherapies (HECs). However, the benefit of addition of NK-1 receptor antagonist to olanzapine regimen has not been demonstrated. This study compared the efficacy of upfront and subsequent addition of netupitant- to olanzapine-containing regimen for preventing CINV from high-dose cisplatin (≥ 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup>).</p><p><strong>Patient and methods: </strong>The double-blind placebo-controlled trial randomized patients receiving high-dose cisplatin to upfront and subsequent netupitant arms. In upfront netupitant arm, patients received NEPA (a combination of netupitant and palonosetron), dexamethasone, and olanzapine since first cycle. In subsequent netupitant arm, patients received olanzapine, dexamethasone, and ondansetron in first cycle but received NEPA, dexamethasone, and olanzapine in second cycle if no complete response (CR). After preplanned analysis, the initial dexamethasone dose in netupitant regimen was modified from 4 to 8 mg on Days 2-4. The primary endpoint was the overall CR rate of two cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2019 and December 2020, 51 and 49 patients were randomly assigned to upfront and subsequent netupitant arms, respectively. CR rates in acute (0-24 h), delayed (> 24-120 h), and overall periods were 93.0% versus 77.4% (p = 0.003), 75.5% versus 68.8% (p = 0.31), and 73.3% and 67.7% (p = 0.34) in upfront and subsequent netupitant arms, respectively. After amendment to increase dexamethasone in netupitant regimen, first-cycle CR rates in acute, delayed, and overall periods were 95.2% versus 87.7% (p = 0.34), 85.7% versus 73.5% (p = 0.26), and 85.7% and 69.4% (p = 0.26) in 4-drug and 3-drug groups, respectively. Among 15 patients crossing over to receive netupitant regimen in second cycle, CR was 46.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this Phase II trial, there was no significant improvement in overall CR when patients received upfront netupitant compared to subsequent addition of netupitant to an olanzapine regimen in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study Comparing Upfront and Subsequent Netupitant in Addition to Olanzapine-Containing Regimen for Prevention of High-Dose Cisplatin-Induced Nausea/Vomiting.\",\"authors\":\"Chanida Vinayanuwattikun, Chalermchai Lertanansit, Wasamol Mahaparn, Attapol Chotirut, Nicha Zungsontiporn, Suleepon Uttamapinan, Nattaya Sintawichai, Piyada Sitthideatphaiboon, Virote Sriuranpong, Suebpong Tanasanvimon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajco.14192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Addition of olanzapine to NK-1 receptor antagonist regimen improves chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) prevention for highly emetogenic chemotherapies (HECs). However, the benefit of addition of NK-1 receptor antagonist to olanzapine regimen has not been demonstrated. This study compared the efficacy of upfront and subsequent addition of netupitant- to olanzapine-containing regimen for preventing CINV from high-dose cisplatin (≥ 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup>).</p><p><strong>Patient and methods: </strong>The double-blind placebo-controlled trial randomized patients receiving high-dose cisplatin to upfront and subsequent netupitant arms. In upfront netupitant arm, patients received NEPA (a combination of netupitant and palonosetron), dexamethasone, and olanzapine since first cycle. In subsequent netupitant arm, patients received olanzapine, dexamethasone, and ondansetron in first cycle but received NEPA, dexamethasone, and olanzapine in second cycle if no complete response (CR). After preplanned analysis, the initial dexamethasone dose in netupitant regimen was modified from 4 to 8 mg on Days 2-4. The primary endpoint was the overall CR rate of two cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2019 and December 2020, 51 and 49 patients were randomly assigned to upfront and subsequent netupitant arms, respectively. CR rates in acute (0-24 h), delayed (> 24-120 h), and overall periods were 93.0% versus 77.4% (p = 0.003), 75.5% versus 68.8% (p = 0.31), and 73.3% and 67.7% (p = 0.34) in upfront and subsequent netupitant arms, respectively. After amendment to increase dexamethasone in netupitant regimen, first-cycle CR rates in acute, delayed, and overall periods were 95.2% versus 87.7% (p = 0.34), 85.7% versus 73.5% (p = 0.26), and 85.7% and 69.4% (p = 0.26) in 4-drug and 3-drug groups, respectively. Among 15 patients crossing over to receive netupitant regimen in second cycle, CR was 46.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this Phase II trial, there was no significant improvement in overall CR when patients received upfront netupitant compared to subsequent addition of netupitant to an olanzapine regimen in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14192\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在NK-1受体拮抗剂方案中加入奥氮平可改善高致吐性化疗(HECs)化疗诱导的恶心和呕吐(CINV)预防。然而,在奥氮平方案中加入NK-1受体拮抗剂的益处尚未得到证实。本研究比较了在高剂量顺铂(≥75 mg/m2)治疗后,先加尼吡坦治疗后加奥氮平治疗预防CINV的疗效。患者和方法:双盲安慰剂对照试验将接受大剂量顺铂的患者随机分为前期和后续尼吡坦组。在前期尼妥吡坦组,患者从第一个周期开始接受NEPA(尼妥吡坦和帕洛诺司琼的联合用药)、地塞米松和奥氮平。在随后的尼妥坦组中,患者在第一个周期接受奥氮平、地塞米松和昂丹司琼治疗,但如果没有完全缓解(CR),则在第二个周期接受NEPA、地塞米松和奥氮平治疗。经过预先计划的分析,在第2-4天将尼吡坦方案中地塞米松的初始剂量从4 mg修改为8 mg。主要终点是两个周期的总CR率。结果:在2019年1月至2020年12月期间,51名和49名患者分别被随机分配到前期和后续的尼吡坦组。急性期(0-24小时)、延迟期(24-120小时)和总期的CR率分别为93.0%对77.4% (p = 0.003)、75.5%对68.8% (p = 0.31)、前期和后续用药组的CR率分别为73.3%和67.7% (p = 0.34)。在尼妥坦方案中增加地塞米松后,4药组和3药组急性期、延迟期和总期的第一周期CR率分别为95.2%对87.7% (p = 0.34)、85.7%对73.5% (p = 0.26)、85.7%和69.4% (p = 0.26)。15例患者在第二周期交叉接受奈吡坦方案,CR为46.6%。结论:在这项II期试验中,接受大剂量顺铂化疗的患者,与随后在奥氮平方案中添加尼妥吡坦相比,接受尼妥吡坦的患者在总CR方面没有显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study Comparing Upfront and Subsequent Netupitant in Addition to Olanzapine-Containing Regimen for Prevention of High-Dose Cisplatin-Induced Nausea/Vomiting.

Background: Addition of olanzapine to NK-1 receptor antagonist regimen improves chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) prevention for highly emetogenic chemotherapies (HECs). However, the benefit of addition of NK-1 receptor antagonist to olanzapine regimen has not been demonstrated. This study compared the efficacy of upfront and subsequent addition of netupitant- to olanzapine-containing regimen for preventing CINV from high-dose cisplatin (≥ 75 mg/m2).

Patient and methods: The double-blind placebo-controlled trial randomized patients receiving high-dose cisplatin to upfront and subsequent netupitant arms. In upfront netupitant arm, patients received NEPA (a combination of netupitant and palonosetron), dexamethasone, and olanzapine since first cycle. In subsequent netupitant arm, patients received olanzapine, dexamethasone, and ondansetron in first cycle but received NEPA, dexamethasone, and olanzapine in second cycle if no complete response (CR). After preplanned analysis, the initial dexamethasone dose in netupitant regimen was modified from 4 to 8 mg on Days 2-4. The primary endpoint was the overall CR rate of two cycles.

Results: Between January 2019 and December 2020, 51 and 49 patients were randomly assigned to upfront and subsequent netupitant arms, respectively. CR rates in acute (0-24 h), delayed (> 24-120 h), and overall periods were 93.0% versus 77.4% (p = 0.003), 75.5% versus 68.8% (p = 0.31), and 73.3% and 67.7% (p = 0.34) in upfront and subsequent netupitant arms, respectively. After amendment to increase dexamethasone in netupitant regimen, first-cycle CR rates in acute, delayed, and overall periods were 95.2% versus 87.7% (p = 0.34), 85.7% versus 73.5% (p = 0.26), and 85.7% and 69.4% (p = 0.26) in 4-drug and 3-drug groups, respectively. Among 15 patients crossing over to receive netupitant regimen in second cycle, CR was 46.6%.

Conclusion: In this Phase II trial, there was no significant improvement in overall CR when patients received upfront netupitant compared to subsequent addition of netupitant to an olanzapine regimen in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信