Meng Zhou, Elizabeth Chihobve, Baojin Zhao, Zhen Song
{"title":"样本大小的确定:在环境影响评价地球化学采样中的应用。","authors":"Meng Zhou, Elizabeth Chihobve, Baojin Zhao, Zhen Song","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02195-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantification of the uncertainties associated with environmental geochemical prediction, such as the function of sample size, remains a concern when performing impact assessments, more specifically Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA). While the determination of sample size in the EIA is limited, there is a definite need for the development of a statistical method, together with a protocol, to address geochemical sample sizing and representative analyses. Based on Central Limit Theorem, this article proposes a statistical method to determine sample sizes, by use of the Vaal River tailing dams in the Witwatersrand Basin and slag dumps of Transalloys Co., Witbank, South Africa, as case studies. It also discusses factors such as confidence intervals, acceptable sampling errors, etc., that could influence sample size estimation, and recommends a trade-off strategy to reduce the sample size for economic reasons. A sample size determination formula was derived at to be used for EIA research and practical work, namely <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msup><mrow><mo>(</mo> <mfrac> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Z</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>α</mi> <mo>/</mo> <mn>2</mn></mrow> </msub> <mo>×</mo> <mi>S</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow> </mfrac> <mo>)</mo></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msup> </mrow> </math> (n - sample number taken), <math> <msub><mrow><mi>Z</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>α</mi> <mo>/</mo> <mn>2</mn></mrow> </msub> </math> - obtained from confidence level, S - standard deviation from the sample, d - sampling error, and a benchmark for sampling error was proposed: <math> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>benchmark</mi></mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow> <mrow> <msqrt><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow> </msqrt> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </math> for stakeholders to make wise decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":"1886-1898"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sampling Size Determination: Application in Geochemical Sampling for Environmental Impact Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Meng Zhou, Elizabeth Chihobve, Baojin Zhao, Zhen Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00267-025-02195-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quantification of the uncertainties associated with environmental geochemical prediction, such as the function of sample size, remains a concern when performing impact assessments, more specifically Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA). While the determination of sample size in the EIA is limited, there is a definite need for the development of a statistical method, together with a protocol, to address geochemical sample sizing and representative analyses. Based on Central Limit Theorem, this article proposes a statistical method to determine sample sizes, by use of the Vaal River tailing dams in the Witwatersrand Basin and slag dumps of Transalloys Co., Witbank, South Africa, as case studies. It also discusses factors such as confidence intervals, acceptable sampling errors, etc., that could influence sample size estimation, and recommends a trade-off strategy to reduce the sample size for economic reasons. A sample size determination formula was derived at to be used for EIA research and practical work, namely <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msup><mrow><mo>(</mo> <mfrac> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Z</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>α</mi> <mo>/</mo> <mn>2</mn></mrow> </msub> <mo>×</mo> <mi>S</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow> </mfrac> <mo>)</mo></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msup> </mrow> </math> (n - sample number taken), <math> <msub><mrow><mi>Z</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>α</mi> <mo>/</mo> <mn>2</mn></mrow> </msub> </math> - obtained from confidence level, S - standard deviation from the sample, d - sampling error, and a benchmark for sampling error was proposed: <math> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>benchmark</mi></mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow> <mrow> <msqrt><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow> </msqrt> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow> </math> for stakeholders to make wise decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1886-1898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02195-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02195-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在进行影响评价,特别是环境影响评价时,与环境地球化学预测有关的不确定性的量化,例如样本量的函数,仍然是一个值得关注的问题。虽然环境影响评估中样本量的确定是有限的,但确实需要制定一种统计方法和一项协议,以解决地球化学样品的大小和代表性分析问题。本文基于中心极限定理,以南非威特沃特斯兰德盆地的瓦尔河尾矿坝和南非威特班克Transalloys Co.的矿渣堆积场为例,提出了一种确定样本量的统计方法。它还讨论了可能影响样本量估计的因素,如置信区间、可接受的抽样误差等,并推荐了一种权衡策略,以出于经济原因减少样本量。推导了用于环境影响评估研究和实际工作的样本量确定公式,即n = (Z α / 2 × S d) 2 (n -所取样本数),Z α / 2 -由置信水平得到,S -样本标准差,d -抽样误差,并提出了抽样误差基准:d基准= S n,以供利益相关者做出明智决策。
Sampling Size Determination: Application in Geochemical Sampling for Environmental Impact Assessment.
Quantification of the uncertainties associated with environmental geochemical prediction, such as the function of sample size, remains a concern when performing impact assessments, more specifically Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA). While the determination of sample size in the EIA is limited, there is a definite need for the development of a statistical method, together with a protocol, to address geochemical sample sizing and representative analyses. Based on Central Limit Theorem, this article proposes a statistical method to determine sample sizes, by use of the Vaal River tailing dams in the Witwatersrand Basin and slag dumps of Transalloys Co., Witbank, South Africa, as case studies. It also discusses factors such as confidence intervals, acceptable sampling errors, etc., that could influence sample size estimation, and recommends a trade-off strategy to reduce the sample size for economic reasons. A sample size determination formula was derived at to be used for EIA research and practical work, namely (n - sample number taken), - obtained from confidence level, S - standard deviation from the sample, d - sampling error, and a benchmark for sampling error was proposed: for stakeholders to make wise decisions.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more.
As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.