慢性髓细胞白血病单倍体和匹配相关供体的结果比较:一项多中心现实世界研究。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Yu-Qian Sun, Li-Xin Wu, Yi-Cheng Zhang, Ya-Jing Xu, Xiao-Bing Huang, Bao-Dong Ye, Hai-Long Yuan, Jian-Ying Zhou, Su-Jun Gao, Fang Zhou, Yue Liu, Xian-Min Song, Yu Cai, Xiao-Liang Liu, Yi Luo, Lu-Xin Yang, Jian-Min Yang, Li-Bing Wang, Yu-Hua Li, Rui Huang, Shun-Qing Wang, Ming Zhou, Yu-Jun Dong, Qian Wang, Yi-Mei Feng, Xi Zhang, Xin Du, Wei Ling, Han Zhu, Zun-Min Zhu, Xiang-Li Chen, Shi-Yu Wang, Fan-Kai Meng, Ke-Hong Bi, Ning Huang, Ming Jiang, Ting Niu, Jie Ji, Ding-Ming Wan, Zhi-Lei Bian, Yi Chen, Li Liu, Xue-Qian Yan, Xi Yang, Hai Yi, Xu-Dong Wei, Xin Li, Qian Cheng, Cheng-Lu Yuan, Wen Wang, Yu-Hong Zhou, Yu-Hong Chen, Feng-Rong Wang, Yuan-Yuan Zhang, Zhi-Dong Wang, Xiao-Dong Mo, Wei Han, Jing-Zhi Wang, Yu Wang, Huan Chen, Xiang-Yu Zhao, Ying-Jun Chang, Kai-Yan Liu, Jia Feng, Lan-Ping Xu, Hong-Yu Zhang, Xiao-Jun Huang, Xiao-Hui Zhang
{"title":"慢性髓细胞白血病单倍体和匹配相关供体的结果比较:一项多中心现实世界研究。","authors":"Yu-Qian Sun, Li-Xin Wu, Yi-Cheng Zhang, Ya-Jing Xu, Xiao-Bing Huang, Bao-Dong Ye, Hai-Long Yuan, Jian-Ying Zhou, Su-Jun Gao, Fang Zhou, Yue Liu, Xian-Min Song, Yu Cai, Xiao-Liang Liu, Yi Luo, Lu-Xin Yang, Jian-Min Yang, Li-Bing Wang, Yu-Hua Li, Rui Huang, Shun-Qing Wang, Ming Zhou, Yu-Jun Dong, Qian Wang, Yi-Mei Feng, Xi Zhang, Xin Du, Wei Ling, Han Zhu, Zun-Min Zhu, Xiang-Li Chen, Shi-Yu Wang, Fan-Kai Meng, Ke-Hong Bi, Ning Huang, Ming Jiang, Ting Niu, Jie Ji, Ding-Ming Wan, Zhi-Lei Bian, Yi Chen, Li Liu, Xue-Qian Yan, Xi Yang, Hai Yi, Xu-Dong Wei, Xin Li, Qian Cheng, Cheng-Lu Yuan, Wen Wang, Yu-Hong Zhou, Yu-Hong Chen, Feng-Rong Wang, Yuan-Yuan Zhang, Zhi-Dong Wang, Xiao-Dong Mo, Wei Han, Jing-Zhi Wang, Yu Wang, Huan Chen, Xiang-Yu Zhao, Ying-Jun Chang, Kai-Yan Liu, Jia Feng, Lan-Ping Xu, Hong-Yu Zhang, Xiao-Jun Huang, Xiao-Hui Zhang","doi":"10.1002/ijc.35485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative strategy for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). However, few reports have investigated the outcomes of patients receiving haploidentical HSCT. To this end, we included 117 patients with haploidentical donors (HID) and 75 patients with matched related donors (MRD) from 28 centers across China to explore the prognostic impact of different transplantation modalities. We found no significant difference between these two groups in terms of event-free survival (EFS, p = .211), overall survival (OS, p = .503), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, p = .076) or non-relapse mortality (NRM, p = .794). The predominance of peripheral blood (PB) graft source over bone marrow and PB since 2020 may have contributed to the worse outcomes in the MRD group. Moreover, CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS) lower-risk patients benefited more from the HID modality with superior EFS (p = .006). Multivariate analysis indicated that advanced age (p = .013), anemia at diagnosis (p = .010), and donor relationship (parent-to-child, p = .013) were independently associated with worse EFS in the HID group. Our data suggested that HID was comparable to MRD in CMML. However, under certain conditions, such as CPSS lower-risk ones, HID was preferred.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of outcomes between haploidentical and matched related donors for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: A multicenter real-world study.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Qian Sun, Li-Xin Wu, Yi-Cheng Zhang, Ya-Jing Xu, Xiao-Bing Huang, Bao-Dong Ye, Hai-Long Yuan, Jian-Ying Zhou, Su-Jun Gao, Fang Zhou, Yue Liu, Xian-Min Song, Yu Cai, Xiao-Liang Liu, Yi Luo, Lu-Xin Yang, Jian-Min Yang, Li-Bing Wang, Yu-Hua Li, Rui Huang, Shun-Qing Wang, Ming Zhou, Yu-Jun Dong, Qian Wang, Yi-Mei Feng, Xi Zhang, Xin Du, Wei Ling, Han Zhu, Zun-Min Zhu, Xiang-Li Chen, Shi-Yu Wang, Fan-Kai Meng, Ke-Hong Bi, Ning Huang, Ming Jiang, Ting Niu, Jie Ji, Ding-Ming Wan, Zhi-Lei Bian, Yi Chen, Li Liu, Xue-Qian Yan, Xi Yang, Hai Yi, Xu-Dong Wei, Xin Li, Qian Cheng, Cheng-Lu Yuan, Wen Wang, Yu-Hong Zhou, Yu-Hong Chen, Feng-Rong Wang, Yuan-Yuan Zhang, Zhi-Dong Wang, Xiao-Dong Mo, Wei Han, Jing-Zhi Wang, Yu Wang, Huan Chen, Xiang-Yu Zhao, Ying-Jun Chang, Kai-Yan Liu, Jia Feng, Lan-Ping Xu, Hong-Yu Zhang, Xiao-Jun Huang, Xiao-Hui Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijc.35485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative strategy for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). However, few reports have investigated the outcomes of patients receiving haploidentical HSCT. To this end, we included 117 patients with haploidentical donors (HID) and 75 patients with matched related donors (MRD) from 28 centers across China to explore the prognostic impact of different transplantation modalities. We found no significant difference between these two groups in terms of event-free survival (EFS, p = .211), overall survival (OS, p = .503), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, p = .076) or non-relapse mortality (NRM, p = .794). The predominance of peripheral blood (PB) graft source over bone marrow and PB since 2020 may have contributed to the worse outcomes in the MRD group. Moreover, CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS) lower-risk patients benefited more from the HID modality with superior EFS (p = .006). Multivariate analysis indicated that advanced age (p = .013), anemia at diagnosis (p = .010), and donor relationship (parent-to-child, p = .013) were independently associated with worse EFS in the HID group. Our data suggested that HID was comparable to MRD in CMML. However, under certain conditions, such as CPSS lower-risk ones, HID was preferred.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35485\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

同种异体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)是慢性髓细胞白血病(CMML)患者唯一的治疗策略。然而,很少有报道调查了接受单倍体移植的患者的结果。为此,我们纳入了来自中国28个中心的117例单倍体供体(HID)患者和75例匹配相关供体(MRD)患者,以探讨不同移植方式对预后的影响。我们发现两组在无事件生存期(EFS, p = .211)、总生存期(OS, p = .503)、累积复发发生率(CIR, p = .076)或非复发死亡率(NRM, p = .794)方面无显著差异。自2020年以来,外周血(PB)移植来源超过骨髓和PB的优势可能是MRD组预后较差的原因。此外,cmml特异性预后评分系统(CPSS)低风险患者从具有优越EFS的HID模式中获益更多(p = 0.006)。多因素分析显示,老年(p = 0.013)、诊断时贫血(p = 0.010)和供体关系(亲子关系,p = 0.013)与HID组EFS恶化独立相关。我们的数据表明,在CMML中,HID与MRD相当。然而,在某些情况下,如CPSS低风险的情况下,HID是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of outcomes between haploidentical and matched related donors for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: A multicenter real-world study.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative strategy for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). However, few reports have investigated the outcomes of patients receiving haploidentical HSCT. To this end, we included 117 patients with haploidentical donors (HID) and 75 patients with matched related donors (MRD) from 28 centers across China to explore the prognostic impact of different transplantation modalities. We found no significant difference between these two groups in terms of event-free survival (EFS, p = .211), overall survival (OS, p = .503), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, p = .076) or non-relapse mortality (NRM, p = .794). The predominance of peripheral blood (PB) graft source over bone marrow and PB since 2020 may have contributed to the worse outcomes in the MRD group. Moreover, CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS) lower-risk patients benefited more from the HID modality with superior EFS (p = .006). Multivariate analysis indicated that advanced age (p = .013), anemia at diagnosis (p = .010), and donor relationship (parent-to-child, p = .013) were independently associated with worse EFS in the HID group. Our data suggested that HID was comparable to MRD in CMML. However, under certain conditions, such as CPSS lower-risk ones, HID was preferred.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信