美国的激光美容:谁在使用它们,最新的技术,以及患者需要知道什么

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Kensington Coyle, Katarina R. Kesty
{"title":"美国的激光美容:谁在使用它们,最新的技术,以及患者需要知道什么","authors":"Kensington Coyle,&nbsp;Katarina R. Kesty","doi":"10.1111/jocd.70235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The use of laser treatments for cosmetic and medical dermatologic conditions has increased significantly, yet provider training varies widely, raising concerns about patient safety and treatment efficacy. This study examines the availability and practice patterns of fellowship-trained laser dermatologists and compares them to medical spas and plastic surgeons offering laser services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In September 2024, an online search and telephone survey were conducted to identify board-certified dermatologists who completed an American Society for Dermatologic Surgery (ASDS) Cosmetics and Lasers Fellowship. Data on consultation availability, pricing, provider involvement, technology investment, and treatment customization were collected from dermatology, plastic surgery, and medical spa practices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 124 fellowship-trained dermatologists were identified. Compared to medical spas and plastic surgeons, these dermatologists had longer wait times for consultations (23 vs. 4 and 11 days), higher consultation fees ($153 vs. $30 and $78), and a greater number of laser devices per practice. Physician involvement in laser procedures was significantly higher among dermatologists (60%) compared to plastic surgeons (33%) and medical spas (9%). Medical spas relied heavily on nonphysician providers (26%) and laser technicians (56%), with only 41% providing direct on-site supervision. The majority (98%) of dermatologists and plastic surgeons customized laser treatments, compared to 63% of medical spas. Dermatologists dedicated more clinical time to laser procedures, with 19% spending over 50% of their practice on lasers, compared to none at medical spas and plastic surgery offices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Fellowship-trained laser dermatologists provide more direct physician involvement, greater technological resources, and highly customized treatments compared to medical spas and plastic surgeons. While medical spas offer lower costs and shorter wait times, the lack of physician oversight and limited training among providers may represent substandard care. These findings highlight the importance of provider qualifications in ensuring optimal patient outcomes and underscore the value of specialized laser training in dermatology.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":"24 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jocd.70235","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cosmetic Lasers in the US: Who's Using Them, the Latest Technology, and What Patients Need to Know\",\"authors\":\"Kensington Coyle,&nbsp;Katarina R. Kesty\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocd.70235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The use of laser treatments for cosmetic and medical dermatologic conditions has increased significantly, yet provider training varies widely, raising concerns about patient safety and treatment efficacy. This study examines the availability and practice patterns of fellowship-trained laser dermatologists and compares them to medical spas and plastic surgeons offering laser services.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In September 2024, an online search and telephone survey were conducted to identify board-certified dermatologists who completed an American Society for Dermatologic Surgery (ASDS) Cosmetics and Lasers Fellowship. Data on consultation availability, pricing, provider involvement, technology investment, and treatment customization were collected from dermatology, plastic surgery, and medical spa practices.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 124 fellowship-trained dermatologists were identified. Compared to medical spas and plastic surgeons, these dermatologists had longer wait times for consultations (23 vs. 4 and 11 days), higher consultation fees ($153 vs. $30 and $78), and a greater number of laser devices per practice. Physician involvement in laser procedures was significantly higher among dermatologists (60%) compared to plastic surgeons (33%) and medical spas (9%). Medical spas relied heavily on nonphysician providers (26%) and laser technicians (56%), with only 41% providing direct on-site supervision. The majority (98%) of dermatologists and plastic surgeons customized laser treatments, compared to 63% of medical spas. Dermatologists dedicated more clinical time to laser procedures, with 19% spending over 50% of their practice on lasers, compared to none at medical spas and plastic surgery offices.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fellowship-trained laser dermatologists provide more direct physician involvement, greater technological resources, and highly customized treatments compared to medical spas and plastic surgeons. While medical spas offer lower costs and shorter wait times, the lack of physician oversight and limited training among providers may represent substandard care. These findings highlight the importance of provider qualifications in ensuring optimal patient outcomes and underscore the value of specialized laser training in dermatology.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"24 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jocd.70235\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.70235\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.70235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:激光治疗美容和医学皮肤病的使用显著增加,但提供者培训差异很大,引起了对患者安全和治疗效果的担忧。本研究考察了获得奖学金培训的激光皮肤科医生的可用性和实践模式,并将他们与提供激光服务的医疗水疗中心和整形外科医生进行了比较。方法于2024年9月,通过在线搜索和电话调查,确定完成美国皮肤外科学会(ASDS)化妆品和激光奖学金的委员会认证皮肤科医生。从皮肤科、整形外科和医疗水疗实践中收集了有关咨询可用性、定价、提供者参与、技术投资和治疗定制的数据。结果共确定了124名接受过研究金培训的皮肤科医生。与医疗水疗中心和整形外科医生相比,这些皮肤科医生的咨询等待时间更长(23天和11天),咨询费更高(153美元对30美元和78美元),而且每次执业的激光设备数量更多。皮肤科医生(60%)参与激光手术的比例明显高于整形外科医生(33%)和医疗水疗师(9%)。医疗水疗中心严重依赖非医生提供者(26%)和激光技术人员(56%),只有41%的人提供直接的现场监督。大多数(98%)皮肤科医生和整形外科医生定制激光治疗,而医疗水疗中心的这一比例为63%。皮肤科医生将更多的临床时间花在激光手术上,19%的皮肤科医生将超过50%的时间花在激光手术上,而医疗水疗中心和整形外科诊所的这一比例为零。结论:与医学水疗中心和整形外科医生相比,接受过奖学金培训的激光皮肤科医生提供了更多的直接医师参与,更多的技术资源和高度定制的治疗。虽然医疗水疗中心提供较低的成本和较短的等待时间,但缺乏医生监督和提供者之间有限的培训可能代表不合格的护理。这些发现强调了提供者资格在确保最佳患者预后方面的重要性,并强调了皮肤科专业激光培训的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cosmetic Lasers in the US: Who's Using Them, the Latest Technology, and What Patients Need to Know

Background

The use of laser treatments for cosmetic and medical dermatologic conditions has increased significantly, yet provider training varies widely, raising concerns about patient safety and treatment efficacy. This study examines the availability and practice patterns of fellowship-trained laser dermatologists and compares them to medical spas and plastic surgeons offering laser services.

Methods

In September 2024, an online search and telephone survey were conducted to identify board-certified dermatologists who completed an American Society for Dermatologic Surgery (ASDS) Cosmetics and Lasers Fellowship. Data on consultation availability, pricing, provider involvement, technology investment, and treatment customization were collected from dermatology, plastic surgery, and medical spa practices.

Results

A total of 124 fellowship-trained dermatologists were identified. Compared to medical spas and plastic surgeons, these dermatologists had longer wait times for consultations (23 vs. 4 and 11 days), higher consultation fees ($153 vs. $30 and $78), and a greater number of laser devices per practice. Physician involvement in laser procedures was significantly higher among dermatologists (60%) compared to plastic surgeons (33%) and medical spas (9%). Medical spas relied heavily on nonphysician providers (26%) and laser technicians (56%), with only 41% providing direct on-site supervision. The majority (98%) of dermatologists and plastic surgeons customized laser treatments, compared to 63% of medical spas. Dermatologists dedicated more clinical time to laser procedures, with 19% spending over 50% of their practice on lasers, compared to none at medical spas and plastic surgery offices.

Conclusion

Fellowship-trained laser dermatologists provide more direct physician involvement, greater technological resources, and highly customized treatments compared to medical spas and plastic surgeons. While medical spas offer lower costs and shorter wait times, the lack of physician oversight and limited training among providers may represent substandard care. These findings highlight the importance of provider qualifications in ensuring optimal patient outcomes and underscore the value of specialized laser training in dermatology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
818
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cosmetic dermatology with the aim to foster the highest standards of patient care in cosmetic dermatology. Published quarterly, the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology facilitates continuing professional development and provides a forum for the exchange of scientific research and innovative techniques. The scope of coverage includes, but will not be limited to: healthy skin; skin maintenance; ageing skin; photodamage and photoprotection; rejuvenation; biochemistry, endocrinology and neuroimmunology of healthy skin; imaging; skin measurement; quality of life; skin types; sensitive skin; rosacea and acne; sebum; sweat; fat; phlebology; hair conservation, restoration and removal; nails and nail surgery; pigment; psychological and medicolegal issues; retinoids; cosmetic chemistry; dermopharmacy; cosmeceuticals; toiletries; striae; cellulite; cosmetic dermatological surgery; blepharoplasty; liposuction; surgical complications; botulinum; fillers, peels and dermabrasion; local and tumescent anaesthesia; electrosurgery; lasers, including laser physics, laser research and safety, vascular lasers, pigment lasers, hair removal lasers, tattoo removal lasers, resurfacing lasers, dermal remodelling lasers and laser complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信