量化能源可持续性的采矿需求和废物

IF 5 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Dinara Ermakova, Drishti Sen, Haruko Wainwright, Jin Whan Bae, Lisha Chen and Jasmina Vujic
{"title":"量化能源可持续性的采矿需求和废物","authors":"Dinara Ermakova, Drishti Sen, Haruko Wainwright, Jin Whan Bae, Lisha Chen and Jasmina Vujic","doi":"10.1039/D4SE01484G","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study demonstrates the life-cycle assessment of different energy sources-coal, natural gas, solar, wind, nuclear, and hydro-particularly focused on mining activities and waste per given electricity capacity and generation. It also includes carbon dioxide emissions generated during the transportation of raw materials to build and operate electricity generating systems and their environmental impacts in the US from 2023 to 2050. We identify the raw material and metal requirements for the U.S.-based typical systems in each energy type and synthesize datasets on typical ore fraction and material recycling factors, while taking into account the capacity factor of the power plants. We then compute the total mass and volume of material requirements and waste mass and volume for the front-end (<em>i.e.</em>, mining, material needed for construction), operation (<em>i.e.</em>, fuel, maintenance), and back-end (<em>i.e.</em>, decommissioning) activities. The key findings are that (1) the energy transition from fossil fuel to low-carbon energy sources would reduce mining waste as well as the shipping carbon footprint; (2) the difference in capacity and actual electricity generation is significant for the life-cycle assessment due to low capacity factors of solar and wind energy; (3) several key metals with low abundance or high requirements dominate mining waste, which highlights the need for recycling and establishing a circular economy; (4) mining of critical minerals becomes important during the clean energy transition and (5) nuclear energy generates least waste and contributes least to shipping emissions among the low-carbon sources due to the high energy density and capacity factor and the small mass of materials it requires. Although the waste mass may not necessarily be equal to the environmental impact due to different waste isolation technologies, we aim to highlight the importance of considering mining and decommissioning waste, which are often ignored but important for accounting for the environmental impacts and addressing energy justice issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":104,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy & Fuels","volume":" 11","pages":" 3120-3140"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/se/d4se01484g?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying mining requirement and waste for energy sustainability\",\"authors\":\"Dinara Ermakova, Drishti Sen, Haruko Wainwright, Jin Whan Bae, Lisha Chen and Jasmina Vujic\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4SE01484G\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >This study demonstrates the life-cycle assessment of different energy sources-coal, natural gas, solar, wind, nuclear, and hydro-particularly focused on mining activities and waste per given electricity capacity and generation. It also includes carbon dioxide emissions generated during the transportation of raw materials to build and operate electricity generating systems and their environmental impacts in the US from 2023 to 2050. We identify the raw material and metal requirements for the U.S.-based typical systems in each energy type and synthesize datasets on typical ore fraction and material recycling factors, while taking into account the capacity factor of the power plants. We then compute the total mass and volume of material requirements and waste mass and volume for the front-end (<em>i.e.</em>, mining, material needed for construction), operation (<em>i.e.</em>, fuel, maintenance), and back-end (<em>i.e.</em>, decommissioning) activities. The key findings are that (1) the energy transition from fossil fuel to low-carbon energy sources would reduce mining waste as well as the shipping carbon footprint; (2) the difference in capacity and actual electricity generation is significant for the life-cycle assessment due to low capacity factors of solar and wind energy; (3) several key metals with low abundance or high requirements dominate mining waste, which highlights the need for recycling and establishing a circular economy; (4) mining of critical minerals becomes important during the clean energy transition and (5) nuclear energy generates least waste and contributes least to shipping emissions among the low-carbon sources due to the high energy density and capacity factor and the small mass of materials it requires. Although the waste mass may not necessarily be equal to the environmental impact due to different waste isolation technologies, we aim to highlight the importance of considering mining and decommissioning waste, which are often ignored but important for accounting for the environmental impacts and addressing energy justice issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Energy & Fuels\",\"volume\":\" 11\",\"pages\":\" 3120-3140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/se/d4se01484g?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Energy & Fuels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/se/d4se01484g\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/se/d4se01484g","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究展示了对不同能源——煤、天然气、太阳能、风能、核能和水力——的生命周期评估,特别侧重于按给定的发电能力和发电量进行采矿活动和废物处理。它还包括2023年至2050年在美国建造和运行发电系统的原材料运输过程中产生的二氧化碳排放量及其对环境的影响。我们确定了每种能源类型的美国典型系统的原材料和金属需求,并综合了典型矿石分数和材料回收因素的数据集,同时考虑了发电厂的容量因素。然后,我们计算材料需求的总质量和体积,以及前端(即采矿,建筑所需的材料),操作(即燃料,维护)和后端(即退役)活动的废物质量和体积。研究发现:(1)从化石燃料到低碳能源的能源转型将减少采矿废物和航运碳足迹;(2)由于太阳能和风能的容量因子较低,其容量与实际发电量的差异较大;(3)低丰度或高需要量的几种关键金属主导着矿山废弃物,突出了回收利用和建立循环经济的必要性;(4)在清洁能源转型过程中,关键矿产的开采变得至关重要;(5)在低碳能源中,核能由于能量密度和容量系数高,所需材料质量小,产生的废物最少,对航运排放的贡献最小。尽管由于不同的废物隔离技术,废物量可能不一定等于环境影响,但我们的目的是强调考虑采矿和退役废物的重要性,这些废物经常被忽视,但对于计算环境影响和解决能源正义问题非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying mining requirement and waste for energy sustainability

This study demonstrates the life-cycle assessment of different energy sources-coal, natural gas, solar, wind, nuclear, and hydro-particularly focused on mining activities and waste per given electricity capacity and generation. It also includes carbon dioxide emissions generated during the transportation of raw materials to build and operate electricity generating systems and their environmental impacts in the US from 2023 to 2050. We identify the raw material and metal requirements for the U.S.-based typical systems in each energy type and synthesize datasets on typical ore fraction and material recycling factors, while taking into account the capacity factor of the power plants. We then compute the total mass and volume of material requirements and waste mass and volume for the front-end (i.e., mining, material needed for construction), operation (i.e., fuel, maintenance), and back-end (i.e., decommissioning) activities. The key findings are that (1) the energy transition from fossil fuel to low-carbon energy sources would reduce mining waste as well as the shipping carbon footprint; (2) the difference in capacity and actual electricity generation is significant for the life-cycle assessment due to low capacity factors of solar and wind energy; (3) several key metals with low abundance or high requirements dominate mining waste, which highlights the need for recycling and establishing a circular economy; (4) mining of critical minerals becomes important during the clean energy transition and (5) nuclear energy generates least waste and contributes least to shipping emissions among the low-carbon sources due to the high energy density and capacity factor and the small mass of materials it requires. Although the waste mass may not necessarily be equal to the environmental impact due to different waste isolation technologies, we aim to highlight the importance of considering mining and decommissioning waste, which are often ignored but important for accounting for the environmental impacts and addressing energy justice issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy & Fuels
Sustainable Energy & Fuels Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
394
期刊介绍: Sustainable Energy & Fuels will publish research that contributes to the development of sustainable energy technologies with a particular emphasis on new and next-generation technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信