评估全球倾斜辐照度的反向变换和分离方法:来自高纬度数据的见解

IF 6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Marieke Rynoson , Silvia Ma Lu , Joakim Munkhammar , Pietro Elia Campana
{"title":"评估全球倾斜辐照度的反向变换和分离方法:来自高纬度数据的见解","authors":"Marieke Rynoson ,&nbsp;Silvia Ma Lu ,&nbsp;Joakim Munkhammar ,&nbsp;Pietro Elia Campana","doi":"10.1016/j.solener.2025.113597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate separation of global tilted irradiance (GTI) becomes important when the measured irradiance is used for quality control or PV simulation purposes, for which the latter often requires global horizontal irradiance (GHI), or diffuse and beam irradiance fractions. This study presents an evaluation of irradiance reverse transposition and separation models for the application with GTI in high latitudes. The evaluation is made based on measured and quality controlled six-second irradiance from latitude 59.53°N, containing GTI at 30°, 40°, and 90° tilt angles, as well as GHI and diffuse horizontal irradiance (DHI). Based on a literature review, two specialized GTI reverse transposition and separation models – <span>GTI-DIRINT</span> and <span>Perez-Driesse</span> – and four GHI separation models were chosen for evaluation. The latter were tested in an optimization loop developed for this study that utilizes existing GHI separation models combined with transposition models for reverse transposition and separation of GTI. Specifically, the separation models <span>Erbs</span>, <span>Skartveit1</span>, <span>Engerer2</span>, and <span>Yang4</span> were tested with <span>Hay &amp; Davies</span> and <span>Perez1990</span> transposition.</div><div>The models were investigated using both statistical evaluation metrics and Diebold–Mariano test to compare measured and predicted GHI and DHI. An evaluation with measured data showed that for GTI reverse transposition and separation at high latitudes, the use of the proposed optimization model with <span>Engerer2</span> in combination with <span>Hay &amp; Davies</span> transposition, or the <span>Perez-Driesse</span> model is recommended. This is based on overall good ranking and low bias of GHI prediction with −2.0 W/m<sup>2</sup> and −2.3 W/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":428,"journal":{"name":"Solar Energy","volume":"297 ","pages":"Article 113597"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of reverse transposition and separation methods for global tilted irradiance: Insights from high-latitude data\",\"authors\":\"Marieke Rynoson ,&nbsp;Silvia Ma Lu ,&nbsp;Joakim Munkhammar ,&nbsp;Pietro Elia Campana\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.solener.2025.113597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Accurate separation of global tilted irradiance (GTI) becomes important when the measured irradiance is used for quality control or PV simulation purposes, for which the latter often requires global horizontal irradiance (GHI), or diffuse and beam irradiance fractions. This study presents an evaluation of irradiance reverse transposition and separation models for the application with GTI in high latitudes. The evaluation is made based on measured and quality controlled six-second irradiance from latitude 59.53°N, containing GTI at 30°, 40°, and 90° tilt angles, as well as GHI and diffuse horizontal irradiance (DHI). Based on a literature review, two specialized GTI reverse transposition and separation models – <span>GTI-DIRINT</span> and <span>Perez-Driesse</span> – and four GHI separation models were chosen for evaluation. The latter were tested in an optimization loop developed for this study that utilizes existing GHI separation models combined with transposition models for reverse transposition and separation of GTI. Specifically, the separation models <span>Erbs</span>, <span>Skartveit1</span>, <span>Engerer2</span>, and <span>Yang4</span> were tested with <span>Hay &amp; Davies</span> and <span>Perez1990</span> transposition.</div><div>The models were investigated using both statistical evaluation metrics and Diebold–Mariano test to compare measured and predicted GHI and DHI. An evaluation with measured data showed that for GTI reverse transposition and separation at high latitudes, the use of the proposed optimization model with <span>Engerer2</span> in combination with <span>Hay &amp; Davies</span> transposition, or the <span>Perez-Driesse</span> model is recommended. This is based on overall good ranking and low bias of GHI prediction with −2.0 W/m<sup>2</sup> and −2.3 W/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Solar Energy\",\"volume\":\"297 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113597\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Solar Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X25003603\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X25003603","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当测量的辐照度用于质量控制或PV模拟时,精确分离全局倾斜辐照度(GTI)变得非常重要,因为后者通常需要全局水平辐照度(GHI),或漫射和光束辐照度分数。本文提出了高纬度地区应用GTI的辐照度反变换和分离模型的评价。评估基于测量和质量控制的6秒辐照度,纬度59.53°N,包括30°,40°和90°倾斜角度的GTI,以及GHI和漫射水平辐照度(DHI)。在文献综述的基础上,选择GTI- dirint和Perez-Driesse两种专业的GTI反换位分离模型和4种GTI分离模型进行评价。后者在为本研究开发的优化回路中进行了测试,该优化回路利用现有的GHI分离模型结合转置模型进行GTI的反向转置和分离。具体来说,分离模型Erbs、Skartveit1、Engerer2和Yang4用Hay &进行了测试;Davies和Perez1990调换。采用统计评价指标和Diebold-Mariano检验对模型进行了调查,以比较实测和预测的GHI和DHI。实测数据评价表明,对于高纬度地区的GTI反向变换和分离,采用enger2结合Hay &;建议采用Davies换位或Perez-Driesse模型。这是基于GHI预测的总体良好排名和低偏差,分别为- 2.0 W/m2和- 2.3 W/m2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of reverse transposition and separation methods for global tilted irradiance: Insights from high-latitude data
Accurate separation of global tilted irradiance (GTI) becomes important when the measured irradiance is used for quality control or PV simulation purposes, for which the latter often requires global horizontal irradiance (GHI), or diffuse and beam irradiance fractions. This study presents an evaluation of irradiance reverse transposition and separation models for the application with GTI in high latitudes. The evaluation is made based on measured and quality controlled six-second irradiance from latitude 59.53°N, containing GTI at 30°, 40°, and 90° tilt angles, as well as GHI and diffuse horizontal irradiance (DHI). Based on a literature review, two specialized GTI reverse transposition and separation models – GTI-DIRINT and Perez-Driesse – and four GHI separation models were chosen for evaluation. The latter were tested in an optimization loop developed for this study that utilizes existing GHI separation models combined with transposition models for reverse transposition and separation of GTI. Specifically, the separation models Erbs, Skartveit1, Engerer2, and Yang4 were tested with Hay & Davies and Perez1990 transposition.
The models were investigated using both statistical evaluation metrics and Diebold–Mariano test to compare measured and predicted GHI and DHI. An evaluation with measured data showed that for GTI reverse transposition and separation at high latitudes, the use of the proposed optimization model with Engerer2 in combination with Hay & Davies transposition, or the Perez-Driesse model is recommended. This is based on overall good ranking and low bias of GHI prediction with −2.0 W/m2 and −2.3 W/m2, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Solar Energy
Solar Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
9.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Solar Energy welcomes manuscripts presenting information not previously published in journals on any aspect of solar energy research, development, application, measurement or policy. The term "solar energy" in this context includes the indirect uses such as wind energy and biomass
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信