Megan Comfort , Elizabeth Tibaduiza , Venita Embry , Matthew DeMichele
{"title":"“有一条共同的线索”:通过协作过程转变法院文化,作为审前改革的核心组成部分","authors":"Megan Comfort , Elizabeth Tibaduiza , Venita Embry , Matthew DeMichele","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Efforts to make criminal legal systems in the United States more equitable often focus on implementing and evaluating a specific policy change. Despite a proliferation of such efforts in recent years, the overall climate of reform is shaky and lacking strong evidence of promising approaches to sustainable progress. We studied six jurisdictions participating in an initiative to implement a pretrial release assessment (PRA) as a means of reducing pretrial incarceration. Longitudinal qualitative data were collected during 205 meetings and 36 site visits over 55 months. At the end of data collection, half of the jurisdictions had implemented the PRA and half had not. Analyses indicate that independent of PRA implementation, bringing system actors into collaborative conversations shifted court culture by strengthening partnerships, increasing understanding of system operations, and clarifying how data can inform intervention approaches. These findings highlight the beneficial shifts in court culture that may result from a process structured to promote dialogue, learning, and idea generation. This study underscores that focusing on a discrete policy to effect criminal legal system reform may be too narrow a lens and miss the potentially transformative effects of processes that strengthen partnerships, improve communication, and develop a shared commitment to common goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 102440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“There is a common thread”: Shifting court culture through collaborative processes as a core component of pretrial reform\",\"authors\":\"Megan Comfort , Elizabeth Tibaduiza , Venita Embry , Matthew DeMichele\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Efforts to make criminal legal systems in the United States more equitable often focus on implementing and evaluating a specific policy change. Despite a proliferation of such efforts in recent years, the overall climate of reform is shaky and lacking strong evidence of promising approaches to sustainable progress. We studied six jurisdictions participating in an initiative to implement a pretrial release assessment (PRA) as a means of reducing pretrial incarceration. Longitudinal qualitative data were collected during 205 meetings and 36 site visits over 55 months. At the end of data collection, half of the jurisdictions had implemented the PRA and half had not. Analyses indicate that independent of PRA implementation, bringing system actors into collaborative conversations shifted court culture by strengthening partnerships, increasing understanding of system operations, and clarifying how data can inform intervention approaches. These findings highlight the beneficial shifts in court culture that may result from a process structured to promote dialogue, learning, and idea generation. This study underscores that focusing on a discrete policy to effect criminal legal system reform may be too narrow a lens and miss the potentially transformative effects of processes that strengthen partnerships, improve communication, and develop a shared commitment to common goals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225000893\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225000893","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
“There is a common thread”: Shifting court culture through collaborative processes as a core component of pretrial reform
Efforts to make criminal legal systems in the United States more equitable often focus on implementing and evaluating a specific policy change. Despite a proliferation of such efforts in recent years, the overall climate of reform is shaky and lacking strong evidence of promising approaches to sustainable progress. We studied six jurisdictions participating in an initiative to implement a pretrial release assessment (PRA) as a means of reducing pretrial incarceration. Longitudinal qualitative data were collected during 205 meetings and 36 site visits over 55 months. At the end of data collection, half of the jurisdictions had implemented the PRA and half had not. Analyses indicate that independent of PRA implementation, bringing system actors into collaborative conversations shifted court culture by strengthening partnerships, increasing understanding of system operations, and clarifying how data can inform intervention approaches. These findings highlight the beneficial shifts in court culture that may result from a process structured to promote dialogue, learning, and idea generation. This study underscores that focusing on a discrete policy to effect criminal legal system reform may be too narrow a lens and miss the potentially transformative effects of processes that strengthen partnerships, improve communication, and develop a shared commitment to common goals.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Criminal Justice is an international journal intended to fill the present need for the dissemination of new information, ideas and methods, to both practitioners and academicians in the criminal justice area. The Journal is concerned with all aspects of the criminal justice system in terms of their relationships to each other. Although materials are presented relating to crime and the individual elements of the criminal justice system, the emphasis of the Journal is to tie together the functioning of these elements and to illustrate the effects of their interactions. Articles that reflect the application of new disciplines or analytical methodologies to the problems of criminal justice are of special interest.
Since the purpose of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of new ideas, new information, and the application of new methods to the problems and functions of the criminal justice system, the Journal emphasizes innovation and creative thought of the highest quality.