“有一条共同的线索”:通过协作过程转变法院文化,作为审前改革的核心组成部分

IF 2.5 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Megan Comfort , Elizabeth Tibaduiza , Venita Embry , Matthew DeMichele
{"title":"“有一条共同的线索”:通过协作过程转变法院文化,作为审前改革的核心组成部分","authors":"Megan Comfort ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Tibaduiza ,&nbsp;Venita Embry ,&nbsp;Matthew DeMichele","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Efforts to make criminal legal systems in the United States more equitable often focus on implementing and evaluating a specific policy change. Despite a proliferation of such efforts in recent years, the overall climate of reform is shaky and lacking strong evidence of promising approaches to sustainable progress. We studied six jurisdictions participating in an initiative to implement a pretrial release assessment (PRA) as a means of reducing pretrial incarceration. Longitudinal qualitative data were collected during 205 meetings and 36 site visits over 55 months. At the end of data collection, half of the jurisdictions had implemented the PRA and half had not. Analyses indicate that independent of PRA implementation, bringing system actors into collaborative conversations shifted court culture by strengthening partnerships, increasing understanding of system operations, and clarifying how data can inform intervention approaches. These findings highlight the beneficial shifts in court culture that may result from a process structured to promote dialogue, learning, and idea generation. This study underscores that focusing on a discrete policy to effect criminal legal system reform may be too narrow a lens and miss the potentially transformative effects of processes that strengthen partnerships, improve communication, and develop a shared commitment to common goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 102440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“There is a common thread”: Shifting court culture through collaborative processes as a core component of pretrial reform\",\"authors\":\"Megan Comfort ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Tibaduiza ,&nbsp;Venita Embry ,&nbsp;Matthew DeMichele\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Efforts to make criminal legal systems in the United States more equitable often focus on implementing and evaluating a specific policy change. Despite a proliferation of such efforts in recent years, the overall climate of reform is shaky and lacking strong evidence of promising approaches to sustainable progress. We studied six jurisdictions participating in an initiative to implement a pretrial release assessment (PRA) as a means of reducing pretrial incarceration. Longitudinal qualitative data were collected during 205 meetings and 36 site visits over 55 months. At the end of data collection, half of the jurisdictions had implemented the PRA and half had not. Analyses indicate that independent of PRA implementation, bringing system actors into collaborative conversations shifted court culture by strengthening partnerships, increasing understanding of system operations, and clarifying how data can inform intervention approaches. These findings highlight the beneficial shifts in court culture that may result from a process structured to promote dialogue, learning, and idea generation. This study underscores that focusing on a discrete policy to effect criminal legal system reform may be too narrow a lens and miss the potentially transformative effects of processes that strengthen partnerships, improve communication, and develop a shared commitment to common goals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225000893\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225000893","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使美国刑事法律制度更加公平的努力往往侧重于实施和评估一项具体的政策变化。尽管近年来这种努力激增,但改革的总体气氛是不稳定的,缺乏强有力的证据表明有希望取得可持续进展的办法。我们研究了参与一项倡议的六个司法管辖区,该倡议旨在实施审前释放评估(PRA),以减少审前监禁。在55个月的时间里,在205次会议和36次实地考察期间收集了纵向定性数据。在数据收集结束时,一半的司法管辖区实施了PRA,一半没有。分析表明,独立于PRA的实施,通过加强伙伴关系,增加对系统操作的理解,以及阐明数据如何为干预方法提供信息,将系统参与者带入协作对话可以改变法院文化。这些发现强调了法院文化的有益转变,这可能是促进对话、学习和创意产生的过程的结果。本研究强调,将重点放在一项独立的政策上以实现刑事法律制度改革可能过于狭隘,而忽略了加强伙伴关系、改善沟通和为共同目标制定共同承诺的进程可能产生的变革性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“There is a common thread”: Shifting court culture through collaborative processes as a core component of pretrial reform
Efforts to make criminal legal systems in the United States more equitable often focus on implementing and evaluating a specific policy change. Despite a proliferation of such efforts in recent years, the overall climate of reform is shaky and lacking strong evidence of promising approaches to sustainable progress. We studied six jurisdictions participating in an initiative to implement a pretrial release assessment (PRA) as a means of reducing pretrial incarceration. Longitudinal qualitative data were collected during 205 meetings and 36 site visits over 55 months. At the end of data collection, half of the jurisdictions had implemented the PRA and half had not. Analyses indicate that independent of PRA implementation, bringing system actors into collaborative conversations shifted court culture by strengthening partnerships, increasing understanding of system operations, and clarifying how data can inform intervention approaches. These findings highlight the beneficial shifts in court culture that may result from a process structured to promote dialogue, learning, and idea generation. This study underscores that focusing on a discrete policy to effect criminal legal system reform may be too narrow a lens and miss the potentially transformative effects of processes that strengthen partnerships, improve communication, and develop a shared commitment to common goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminal Justice
Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Criminal Justice is an international journal intended to fill the present need for the dissemination of new information, ideas and methods, to both practitioners and academicians in the criminal justice area. The Journal is concerned with all aspects of the criminal justice system in terms of their relationships to each other. Although materials are presented relating to crime and the individual elements of the criminal justice system, the emphasis of the Journal is to tie together the functioning of these elements and to illustrate the effects of their interactions. Articles that reflect the application of new disciplines or analytical methodologies to the problems of criminal justice are of special interest. Since the purpose of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of new ideas, new information, and the application of new methods to the problems and functions of the criminal justice system, the Journal emphasizes innovation and creative thought of the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信