优化风能、太阳能和水力发电的选址:利用资源时间足迹对资源可持续性的比较分析

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Xiaoxun Huang , Kiichiro Hayashi , Minoru Fujii , Linwei Tao
{"title":"优化风能、太阳能和水力发电的选址:利用资源时间足迹对资源可持续性的比较分析","authors":"Xiaoxun Huang ,&nbsp;Kiichiro Hayashi ,&nbsp;Minoru Fujii ,&nbsp;Linwei Tao","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving carbon neutrality necessitates the integration of renewable energy into existing energy systems. However, most studies on renewable energy site selection focus on individual technologies, often prioritizing a single energy source and failing to account for spatial variability across regions. Here, a novel framework is presented that addresses both site and source selection for distributed renewable energy infrastructure, guided by the principle of resource sustainability. The resource sustainability of small hydropower (SHP), onshore wind power, and rooftop solar photovoltaics (PVs) was compared, and integrated preferential areas were demonstrated. Firstly, the power generation potential of these technologies was estimated, and then their resource sustainability was compared using the resources time footprint (RTF) in terms of materials, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, land, and labor. The preferential areas for these technologies by applying RTF have been identified as a case study in Fujian, China. The total estimated annual electricity generation potential is 5.1 <span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span>10<sup>4</sup> GWh for onshore wind power and 1.5<span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span>10<sup>5</sup> GWh for rooftop solar PV, while individual SHP plants each generate between 0.4 and 32 GWh in Fujian Province. ∆RTF of material is the largest for solar PVs due to the usage of silver for multi-Si module production. The potential of SHP and onshore wind power to reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions is higher than that of solar PV systems. The land occupancy of SHP is greater than that of wind power. ∆RTF of labor is the largest for SHP, followed by wind power and solar PV. Wind power has the smallest average overall ∆RTF (−44.38 years), compared with SHP (−30.38 years) and solar PVs (46.38 years), indicating that wind energy is the most sustainable in the study area. The developed framework offers critical insights for site selection in preliminary planning phases and could be adapted for broader geographic applications, supporting a sustainable energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 101752"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing site selection for wind, solar, and hydropower: A comparative analysis of resource sustainability using resources time footprint\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxun Huang ,&nbsp;Kiichiro Hayashi ,&nbsp;Minoru Fujii ,&nbsp;Linwei Tao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Achieving carbon neutrality necessitates the integration of renewable energy into existing energy systems. However, most studies on renewable energy site selection focus on individual technologies, often prioritizing a single energy source and failing to account for spatial variability across regions. Here, a novel framework is presented that addresses both site and source selection for distributed renewable energy infrastructure, guided by the principle of resource sustainability. The resource sustainability of small hydropower (SHP), onshore wind power, and rooftop solar photovoltaics (PVs) was compared, and integrated preferential areas were demonstrated. Firstly, the power generation potential of these technologies was estimated, and then their resource sustainability was compared using the resources time footprint (RTF) in terms of materials, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, land, and labor. The preferential areas for these technologies by applying RTF have been identified as a case study in Fujian, China. The total estimated annual electricity generation potential is 5.1 <span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span>10<sup>4</sup> GWh for onshore wind power and 1.5<span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span>10<sup>5</sup> GWh for rooftop solar PV, while individual SHP plants each generate between 0.4 and 32 GWh in Fujian Province. ∆RTF of material is the largest for solar PVs due to the usage of silver for multi-Si module production. The potential of SHP and onshore wind power to reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions is higher than that of solar PV systems. The land occupancy of SHP is greater than that of wind power. ∆RTF of labor is the largest for SHP, followed by wind power and solar PV. Wind power has the smallest average overall ∆RTF (−44.38 years), compared with SHP (−30.38 years) and solar PVs (46.38 years), indicating that wind energy is the most sustainable in the study area. The developed framework offers critical insights for site selection in preliminary planning phases and could be adapted for broader geographic applications, supporting a sustainable energy transition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101752\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625001024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625001024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实现碳中和需要将可再生能源整合到现有能源系统中。然而,大多数关于可再生能源选址的研究都侧重于单个技术,往往优先考虑单一能源,而未能考虑到区域间的空间变异性。本文提出了一个新的框架,在资源可持续性原则的指导下,解决了分布式可再生能源基础设施的选址和来源选择问题。对小水电、陆上风电和屋顶太阳能光伏的资源可持续性进行了比较,并展示了综合优惠区域。首先估算了这些技术的发电潜力,然后利用资源时间足迹(RTF)从材料、二氧化碳排放、土地和劳动力四个方面对其资源可持续性进行了比较。以福建省为例,确定了应用RTF技术的优先领域。据估计,福建省陆上风电和屋顶太阳能光伏的年发电潜力分别为5.1 - ×104吉瓦时和1.5×105吉瓦时,而单个SHP电厂的发电量在0.4 - 32吉瓦时之间。由于在多硅组件生产中使用了银,太阳能光伏电池材料的∆RTF最大。SHP和陆上风力发电在减少二氧化碳排放方面的潜力高于太阳能光伏系统。水力发电的土地占用比风力发电大。∆人工RTF最大的是SHP,其次是风能和太阳能光伏。风力发电的平均总∆RTF(- 44.38年)最小,而SHP(- 30.38年)和太阳能光伏(46.38年)最小,表明风能在研究区是最具可持续性的。已开发的框架为初步规划阶段的选址提供了关键见解,并可适用于更广泛的地理应用,支持可持续的能源转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing site selection for wind, solar, and hydropower: A comparative analysis of resource sustainability using resources time footprint
Achieving carbon neutrality necessitates the integration of renewable energy into existing energy systems. However, most studies on renewable energy site selection focus on individual technologies, often prioritizing a single energy source and failing to account for spatial variability across regions. Here, a novel framework is presented that addresses both site and source selection for distributed renewable energy infrastructure, guided by the principle of resource sustainability. The resource sustainability of small hydropower (SHP), onshore wind power, and rooftop solar photovoltaics (PVs) was compared, and integrated preferential areas were demonstrated. Firstly, the power generation potential of these technologies was estimated, and then their resource sustainability was compared using the resources time footprint (RTF) in terms of materials, CO2 emissions, land, and labor. The preferential areas for these technologies by applying RTF have been identified as a case study in Fujian, China. The total estimated annual electricity generation potential is 5.1 ×104 GWh for onshore wind power and 1.5×105 GWh for rooftop solar PV, while individual SHP plants each generate between 0.4 and 32 GWh in Fujian Province. ∆RTF of material is the largest for solar PVs due to the usage of silver for multi-Si module production. The potential of SHP and onshore wind power to reduce CO2 emissions is higher than that of solar PV systems. The land occupancy of SHP is greater than that of wind power. ∆RTF of labor is the largest for SHP, followed by wind power and solar PV. Wind power has the smallest average overall ∆RTF (−44.38 years), compared with SHP (−30.38 years) and solar PVs (46.38 years), indicating that wind energy is the most sustainable in the study area. The developed framework offers critical insights for site selection in preliminary planning phases and could be adapted for broader geographic applications, supporting a sustainable energy transition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信