在罗斯308肉鸡营养中使用复合有机金属杀植物剂和微粉草本植物:对生长性能、肉品质和免疫反应的影响

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Marcin Gumowski , Cassandra Ceccopieri , Jan P. Madej , Katarzyna Leicht , Małgorzata Korzeniowska , Anna Lipińska , Kamil Sierżant , Damian Konkol , Henryk Różański , Muhammad Umair Asghar , Mariusz Korczyński
{"title":"在罗斯308肉鸡营养中使用复合有机金属杀植物剂和微粉草本植物:对生长性能、肉品质和免疫反应的影响","authors":"Marcin Gumowski ,&nbsp;Cassandra Ceccopieri ,&nbsp;Jan P. Madej ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Leicht ,&nbsp;Małgorzata Korzeniowska ,&nbsp;Anna Lipińska ,&nbsp;Kamil Sierżant ,&nbsp;Damian Konkol ,&nbsp;Henryk Różański ,&nbsp;Muhammad Umair Asghar ,&nbsp;Mariusz Korczyński","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Phytobiotics are being investigated as possible substitutes for synthetic growth promoters in poultry feeding because to the increased demand in natural feed additives. This investigation assesses the impact of several phytobiotic formulations on the morphology of the intestinal and lymphoid organs, meat quality, and broiler performance. A total of 1280 Ross 308 broiler chickens were allocated into five experimental groups, including two control groups and three groups administered varying kinds or doses of phytobiotic prototypes. During the course of the 35-day study, key performance metrics such as body weight, feed conversion ratio, and mortality were observed. In addition to histological examinations of the intestines and lymphoid organs to evaluate morphological changes, measurements of pH, colour, tenderness, and chemical composition were used to evaluate the quality of the meat. The findings demonstrated that a single herbal prototype increased (P ≤ 0.05) the body weight of broilers at seven and thirty-five days, with effects similar to those of antibiotic growth promoters. Additionally, this group’s leg muscles showed less drip loss (P ≤ 0.05), which suggests that their meat quality was improved and their ability to retain water was improved. In comparison to controls, chickens that were fed lower concentrations of the same prototype exhibited significantly wider ileal villi (P ≤ 0.05), whereas a second prototype resulted in an increase in villus size. The investigation further demonstrated a rise in CD8 + cells in the spleens of broilers given certain phytobiotic formulations (P ≤ 0.05), suggesting a possible improvement in the immune response via the Th1 signalling pathway. In summary, phytobiotic preparations provide a viable substitute for traditional growth-promoting chemicals in poultry production, with the potential to improve broiler performance, meat quality, and gut health. These results are a valuable addition to the expanding body of evidence that underpins the utilization of plant-derived substances in poultry nutrition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"326 ","pages":"Article 116391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of phytobiotics in the form of complexed organometallic phytoncides and micronized herbs in the nutrition of Ross 308 broiler chickens: Effects on growth performance, meat quality, and immune response\",\"authors\":\"Marcin Gumowski ,&nbsp;Cassandra Ceccopieri ,&nbsp;Jan P. Madej ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Leicht ,&nbsp;Małgorzata Korzeniowska ,&nbsp;Anna Lipińska ,&nbsp;Kamil Sierżant ,&nbsp;Damian Konkol ,&nbsp;Henryk Różański ,&nbsp;Muhammad Umair Asghar ,&nbsp;Mariusz Korczyński\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Phytobiotics are being investigated as possible substitutes for synthetic growth promoters in poultry feeding because to the increased demand in natural feed additives. This investigation assesses the impact of several phytobiotic formulations on the morphology of the intestinal and lymphoid organs, meat quality, and broiler performance. A total of 1280 Ross 308 broiler chickens were allocated into five experimental groups, including two control groups and three groups administered varying kinds or doses of phytobiotic prototypes. During the course of the 35-day study, key performance metrics such as body weight, feed conversion ratio, and mortality were observed. In addition to histological examinations of the intestines and lymphoid organs to evaluate morphological changes, measurements of pH, colour, tenderness, and chemical composition were used to evaluate the quality of the meat. The findings demonstrated that a single herbal prototype increased (P ≤ 0.05) the body weight of broilers at seven and thirty-five days, with effects similar to those of antibiotic growth promoters. Additionally, this group’s leg muscles showed less drip loss (P ≤ 0.05), which suggests that their meat quality was improved and their ability to retain water was improved. In comparison to controls, chickens that were fed lower concentrations of the same prototype exhibited significantly wider ileal villi (P ≤ 0.05), whereas a second prototype resulted in an increase in villus size. The investigation further demonstrated a rise in CD8 + cells in the spleens of broilers given certain phytobiotic formulations (P ≤ 0.05), suggesting a possible improvement in the immune response via the Th1 signalling pathway. In summary, phytobiotic preparations provide a viable substitute for traditional growth-promoting chemicals in poultry production, with the potential to improve broiler performance, meat quality, and gut health. These results are a valuable addition to the expanding body of evidence that underpins the utilization of plant-derived substances in poultry nutrition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"326 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125001865\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125001865","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于对天然饲料添加剂的需求不断增加,人们正在研究植物制剂作为家禽饲料中合成生长促进剂的可能替代品。本研究评估了几种植物制剂对肉鸡肠道和淋巴器官形态、肉质和生产性能的影响。试验选用罗斯308肉鸡1280只,分为5个试验组,其中2个对照组和3个试验组分别饲喂不同种类或剂量的植物制剂原型。在35天的试验期间,观察了体重、饲料系数和死亡率等关键性能指标。除了对肠和淋巴器官进行组织学检查以评估形态学变化外,还使用pH值、颜色、嫩度和化学成分的测量来评估肉的质量。结果表明,单一草药原型对肉鸡7日龄和35日龄体重的提高(P ≤ 0.05)与抗生素生长促进剂的效果相似。此外,试验组腿部肌肉滴水损失较小(P ≤ 0.05),肉质改善,保水能力提高。与对照组相比,饲喂低浓度相同原型的鸡的回肠绒毛明显变宽(P ≤ 0.05),而饲喂第二种原型的鸡的回肠绒毛则增加。研究进一步表明,在特定的植物制剂中,肉仔鸡脾脏中CD8 + 细胞增加(P ≤ 0.05),表明可能通过Th1信号通路改善了免疫应答。综上所述,植物制剂为家禽生产中传统促生长化学品提供了一种可行的替代品,具有改善肉鸡生产性能、肉质和肠道健康的潜力。这些结果为支持在家禽营养中使用植物性物质的证据提供了有价值的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of phytobiotics in the form of complexed organometallic phytoncides and micronized herbs in the nutrition of Ross 308 broiler chickens: Effects on growth performance, meat quality, and immune response
Phytobiotics are being investigated as possible substitutes for synthetic growth promoters in poultry feeding because to the increased demand in natural feed additives. This investigation assesses the impact of several phytobiotic formulations on the morphology of the intestinal and lymphoid organs, meat quality, and broiler performance. A total of 1280 Ross 308 broiler chickens were allocated into five experimental groups, including two control groups and three groups administered varying kinds or doses of phytobiotic prototypes. During the course of the 35-day study, key performance metrics such as body weight, feed conversion ratio, and mortality were observed. In addition to histological examinations of the intestines and lymphoid organs to evaluate morphological changes, measurements of pH, colour, tenderness, and chemical composition were used to evaluate the quality of the meat. The findings demonstrated that a single herbal prototype increased (P ≤ 0.05) the body weight of broilers at seven and thirty-five days, with effects similar to those of antibiotic growth promoters. Additionally, this group’s leg muscles showed less drip loss (P ≤ 0.05), which suggests that their meat quality was improved and their ability to retain water was improved. In comparison to controls, chickens that were fed lower concentrations of the same prototype exhibited significantly wider ileal villi (P ≤ 0.05), whereas a second prototype resulted in an increase in villus size. The investigation further demonstrated a rise in CD8 + cells in the spleens of broilers given certain phytobiotic formulations (P ≤ 0.05), suggesting a possible improvement in the immune response via the Th1 signalling pathway. In summary, phytobiotic preparations provide a viable substitute for traditional growth-promoting chemicals in poultry production, with the potential to improve broiler performance, meat quality, and gut health. These results are a valuable addition to the expanding body of evidence that underpins the utilization of plant-derived substances in poultry nutrition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信