Hossam H. Azzaz , Noha A. Hassaan , Gouda A. Gouda , Yanting Chen , Ahmed E. Kholif
{"title":"一种替代莫能菌素的植物性混合饲料添加剂在哺乳期拉赫马尼母羊日粮中的应用:对饲料利用和产奶量的影响","authors":"Hossam H. Azzaz , Noha A. Hassaan , Gouda A. Gouda , Yanting Chen , Ahmed E. Kholif","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluated the potential of phytogenic feed additives (PFAs) as a replacement for monensin in the diets of lactating Rahmani ewes. Two experiments were conducted using a completely randomized design. The first was an <em>in vitro</em> study that evaluated the effects of increasing doses (0, 0.3, 0.6, and 1 g/kg dry matter [DM]) of PFAs and monensin. The second experiment was an <em>in vivo</em> trial involving 30 lactating ewes (53 ± 0.5 kg body weight), all in their first week of lactation (1–7 days in milk). The ewes were randomly assigned to one of three dietary treatments: control, 0.3 g PFAs, or 0.3 g monensin/ kg DM diet, with 10 ewes per treatment, over a 60-day period. The doses for PFAs and monensin were selected based on the optimal results observed in the <em>in vitro</em> experiment. Before the 60-day experimental period, all ewes underwent a 14-day adaptation period to their respective diets. In the <em>in vitro</em> study, both PFAs and monensin significantly reduced gas and methane production (<em>p</em> < 0.01), with the most substantial reductions observed at the 1 % inclusion level, decreasing by up to 17.6 % and 35.3 %, respectively. Digestibility of DM, organic matter (OM), and fiber improved at moderate inclusion levels (<em>p</em> < 0.01) but declined at 1 %. Additionally, short-chain fatty acids were significantly reduced (<em>p</em> < 0.01) with both additives. In the lactation experiment, supplementation improved nutrient digestibility, including DM, OM, crude protein, and fiber (<em>p</em> < 0.01), with no differences between PFAs and monensin. Blood parameters such as total protein, albumin, glucose, and cholesterol were positively influenced (<em>p</em> < 0.05), while blood urea nitrogen and liver enzymes decreased (<em>p</em> < 0.01). Milk yield, energy output, and feed efficiency improved significantly (<em>p</em> < 0.001), with no differences between the two supplements. The milk fatty acid profile showed reductions in total saturated fatty acids (SFA) and increases in unsaturated fatty acids (UFA), with a higher UFA:SFA ratio. Specific fatty acids, such as α-linolenic acid, increased significantly (<em>p</em> = 0.019). This study concludes that PFAs, at 0.3 g/kg, could effectively replace monensin to improve feed efficiency and lactational performance in Rahmani ewes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"326 ","pages":"Article 116397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A phytogenic feed additive blend as a replacement for monensin in lactating Rahmani ewes' diets: Effects on feed utilization and milk production\",\"authors\":\"Hossam H. Azzaz , Noha A. Hassaan , Gouda A. Gouda , Yanting Chen , Ahmed E. Kholif\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study evaluated the potential of phytogenic feed additives (PFAs) as a replacement for monensin in the diets of lactating Rahmani ewes. Two experiments were conducted using a completely randomized design. The first was an <em>in vitro</em> study that evaluated the effects of increasing doses (0, 0.3, 0.6, and 1 g/kg dry matter [DM]) of PFAs and monensin. The second experiment was an <em>in vivo</em> trial involving 30 lactating ewes (53 ± 0.5 kg body weight), all in their first week of lactation (1–7 days in milk). The ewes were randomly assigned to one of three dietary treatments: control, 0.3 g PFAs, or 0.3 g monensin/ kg DM diet, with 10 ewes per treatment, over a 60-day period. The doses for PFAs and monensin were selected based on the optimal results observed in the <em>in vitro</em> experiment. Before the 60-day experimental period, all ewes underwent a 14-day adaptation period to their respective diets. In the <em>in vitro</em> study, both PFAs and monensin significantly reduced gas and methane production (<em>p</em> < 0.01), with the most substantial reductions observed at the 1 % inclusion level, decreasing by up to 17.6 % and 35.3 %, respectively. Digestibility of DM, organic matter (OM), and fiber improved at moderate inclusion levels (<em>p</em> < 0.01) but declined at 1 %. Additionally, short-chain fatty acids were significantly reduced (<em>p</em> < 0.01) with both additives. In the lactation experiment, supplementation improved nutrient digestibility, including DM, OM, crude protein, and fiber (<em>p</em> < 0.01), with no differences between PFAs and monensin. Blood parameters such as total protein, albumin, glucose, and cholesterol were positively influenced (<em>p</em> < 0.05), while blood urea nitrogen and liver enzymes decreased (<em>p</em> < 0.01). Milk yield, energy output, and feed efficiency improved significantly (<em>p</em> < 0.001), with no differences between the two supplements. The milk fatty acid profile showed reductions in total saturated fatty acids (SFA) and increases in unsaturated fatty acids (UFA), with a higher UFA:SFA ratio. Specific fatty acids, such as α-linolenic acid, increased significantly (<em>p</em> = 0.019). This study concludes that PFAs, at 0.3 g/kg, could effectively replace monensin to improve feed efficiency and lactational performance in Rahmani ewes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"326 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125001920\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125001920","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A phytogenic feed additive blend as a replacement for monensin in lactating Rahmani ewes' diets: Effects on feed utilization and milk production
This study evaluated the potential of phytogenic feed additives (PFAs) as a replacement for monensin in the diets of lactating Rahmani ewes. Two experiments were conducted using a completely randomized design. The first was an in vitro study that evaluated the effects of increasing doses (0, 0.3, 0.6, and 1 g/kg dry matter [DM]) of PFAs and monensin. The second experiment was an in vivo trial involving 30 lactating ewes (53 ± 0.5 kg body weight), all in their first week of lactation (1–7 days in milk). The ewes were randomly assigned to one of three dietary treatments: control, 0.3 g PFAs, or 0.3 g monensin/ kg DM diet, with 10 ewes per treatment, over a 60-day period. The doses for PFAs and monensin were selected based on the optimal results observed in the in vitro experiment. Before the 60-day experimental period, all ewes underwent a 14-day adaptation period to their respective diets. In the in vitro study, both PFAs and monensin significantly reduced gas and methane production (p < 0.01), with the most substantial reductions observed at the 1 % inclusion level, decreasing by up to 17.6 % and 35.3 %, respectively. Digestibility of DM, organic matter (OM), and fiber improved at moderate inclusion levels (p < 0.01) but declined at 1 %. Additionally, short-chain fatty acids were significantly reduced (p < 0.01) with both additives. In the lactation experiment, supplementation improved nutrient digestibility, including DM, OM, crude protein, and fiber (p < 0.01), with no differences between PFAs and monensin. Blood parameters such as total protein, albumin, glucose, and cholesterol were positively influenced (p < 0.05), while blood urea nitrogen and liver enzymes decreased (p < 0.01). Milk yield, energy output, and feed efficiency improved significantly (p < 0.001), with no differences between the two supplements. The milk fatty acid profile showed reductions in total saturated fatty acids (SFA) and increases in unsaturated fatty acids (UFA), with a higher UFA:SFA ratio. Specific fatty acids, such as α-linolenic acid, increased significantly (p = 0.019). This study concludes that PFAs, at 0.3 g/kg, could effectively replace monensin to improve feed efficiency and lactational performance in Rahmani ewes.
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.