Darren E. Stewart , Jessica M. Ruck , Allan B. Massie , Dorry L. Segev , Melissa B. Lesko , Justin C. Chan , Stephanie H. Chang , Travis C. Geraci , Darya Rudym , Mark A. Sonnick , Guido Barmaimon , Luis F. Angel , Jake G. Natalini
{"title":"肺气肿单肺移植与双肺移植的存活率比较。","authors":"Darren E. Stewart , Jessica M. Ruck , Allan B. Massie , Dorry L. Segev , Melissa B. Lesko , Justin C. Chan , Stephanie H. Chang , Travis C. Geraci , Darya Rudym , Mark A. Sonnick , Guido Barmaimon , Luis F. Angel , Jake G. Natalini","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.05.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span><span>The benefits of bilateral lung transplantation (BLT) vs single lung transplantation (SLT) are still debated. One impediment to clinical recommendations is that BLT vs SLT advantages may vary based on underlying disease. Because both options are clinically tenable in patients with </span>emphysema<span>, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of lung allograft<span> survival in this population. Using US registry data, we studied time to all-cause allograft failure in 8092 patients 12 years or older, transplanted from 2006 to 2022, adjusting for recipient, donor, and transplant factors by inverse propensity weighting. Median allograft survival was 6.6 years in BLT compared to 5.3 years in SLT, a 25% risk-adjusted survival advantage of </span></span></span><sub>0.8</sub>1.3<sub>1.8</sub><span> years. Risk-adjusted bilateral survival advantages varied between 0.9 and 2.4 years across 11 subgroups. Median allograft survival in BLT was 1.2 years greater than right SLT and 2.0 years greater than left SLT. During the 16-year study period, allograft survival steadily improved for BLT but not for SLT. Although the 25% BLT survival advantage predated the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, COVID-19 may have contributed to an apparent SLT survival decline. Recognizing the possible influence of residual confounding due to selection biases, these findings may aid offer decision-making when both donor lungs are available.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":"25 10","pages":"Pages 2226-2238"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Graft survival in single versus bilateral lung transplantation for emphysema\",\"authors\":\"Darren E. Stewart , Jessica M. Ruck , Allan B. Massie , Dorry L. Segev , Melissa B. Lesko , Justin C. Chan , Stephanie H. Chang , Travis C. Geraci , Darya Rudym , Mark A. Sonnick , Guido Barmaimon , Luis F. Angel , Jake G. Natalini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.05.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><span><span>The benefits of bilateral lung transplantation (BLT) vs single lung transplantation (SLT) are still debated. One impediment to clinical recommendations is that BLT vs SLT advantages may vary based on underlying disease. Because both options are clinically tenable in patients with </span>emphysema<span>, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of lung allograft<span> survival in this population. Using US registry data, we studied time to all-cause allograft failure in 8092 patients 12 years or older, transplanted from 2006 to 2022, adjusting for recipient, donor, and transplant factors by inverse propensity weighting. Median allograft survival was 6.6 years in BLT compared to 5.3 years in SLT, a 25% risk-adjusted survival advantage of </span></span></span><sub>0.8</sub>1.3<sub>1.8</sub><span> years. Risk-adjusted bilateral survival advantages varied between 0.9 and 2.4 years across 11 subgroups. Median allograft survival in BLT was 1.2 years greater than right SLT and 2.0 years greater than left SLT. During the 16-year study period, allograft survival steadily improved for BLT but not for SLT. Although the 25% BLT survival advantage predated the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, COVID-19 may have contributed to an apparent SLT survival decline. Recognizing the possible influence of residual confounding due to selection biases, these findings may aid offer decision-making when both donor lungs are available.</span></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"25 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2226-2238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1600613525002825\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1600613525002825","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Graft survival in single versus bilateral lung transplantation for emphysema
The benefits of bilateral lung transplantation (BLT) vs single lung transplantation (SLT) are still debated. One impediment to clinical recommendations is that BLT vs SLT advantages may vary based on underlying disease. Because both options are clinically tenable in patients with emphysema, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of lung allograft survival in this population. Using US registry data, we studied time to all-cause allograft failure in 8092 patients 12 years or older, transplanted from 2006 to 2022, adjusting for recipient, donor, and transplant factors by inverse propensity weighting. Median allograft survival was 6.6 years in BLT compared to 5.3 years in SLT, a 25% risk-adjusted survival advantage of 0.81.31.8 years. Risk-adjusted bilateral survival advantages varied between 0.9 and 2.4 years across 11 subgroups. Median allograft survival in BLT was 1.2 years greater than right SLT and 2.0 years greater than left SLT. During the 16-year study period, allograft survival steadily improved for BLT but not for SLT. Although the 25% BLT survival advantage predated the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, COVID-19 may have contributed to an apparent SLT survival decline. Recognizing the possible influence of residual confounding due to selection biases, these findings may aid offer decision-making when both donor lungs are available.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide.
The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.