渔业管理中土著知识系统的包容性

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Keshia Moffat, Jamie Snook, Kenneth Paul, Alejandro Frid
{"title":"渔业管理中土著知识系统的包容性","authors":"Keshia Moffat,&nbsp;Jamie Snook,&nbsp;Kenneth Paul,&nbsp;Alejandro Frid","doi":"10.1111/faf.12905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Indigenous Peoples have developed knowledge systems that foster respectful and reciprocal relations between humans and other-than-human beings, supporting resilient ecosystems and societies. Despite the impacts of colonisation, Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) endure in many parts of the world, and there is growing recognition that IKS can strongly improve fisheries management. During the last 5 years, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), the federal institution responsible for managing Canada's fisheries, released policies and strategies intended to make fisheries management more inclusive of IKS. To measure progress in their implementation, we applied 13 semiquantitative indicators and qualitative analyses of IKS inclusivity to a sample of 78 public documents produced or co-produced by DFO to advise management decisions. Of these documents, ≈87% reported cases that did not meaningfully include Indigenous Peoples and their IKS, 9.0% reported cases in which Indigenous Peoples were included in some aspects of research but their IKS was not, ≈3% reported cases in which IKS contributed to objectives and elements of research design but the process privileged Western science over IKS, and only one document met a high standard for the pairing of IKS and Western science. The indicators that we developed in a Canadian context can be used, with locally appropriate revisions, to gauge the extent to which state governments in other countries are inclusive of IKS in fisheries management, thereby identifying shortcomings in law, policy, and practice and informing mitigation measures. Strengthening the inclusivity of IKS would enable more holistic approaches to fisheries management and benefit global conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"26 4","pages":"669-687"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faf.12905","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusivity of Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Fisheries Management\",\"authors\":\"Keshia Moffat,&nbsp;Jamie Snook,&nbsp;Kenneth Paul,&nbsp;Alejandro Frid\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/faf.12905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Indigenous Peoples have developed knowledge systems that foster respectful and reciprocal relations between humans and other-than-human beings, supporting resilient ecosystems and societies. Despite the impacts of colonisation, Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) endure in many parts of the world, and there is growing recognition that IKS can strongly improve fisheries management. During the last 5 years, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), the federal institution responsible for managing Canada's fisheries, released policies and strategies intended to make fisheries management more inclusive of IKS. To measure progress in their implementation, we applied 13 semiquantitative indicators and qualitative analyses of IKS inclusivity to a sample of 78 public documents produced or co-produced by DFO to advise management decisions. Of these documents, ≈87% reported cases that did not meaningfully include Indigenous Peoples and their IKS, 9.0% reported cases in which Indigenous Peoples were included in some aspects of research but their IKS was not, ≈3% reported cases in which IKS contributed to objectives and elements of research design but the process privileged Western science over IKS, and only one document met a high standard for the pairing of IKS and Western science. The indicators that we developed in a Canadian context can be used, with locally appropriate revisions, to gauge the extent to which state governments in other countries are inclusive of IKS in fisheries management, thereby identifying shortcomings in law, policy, and practice and informing mitigation measures. Strengthening the inclusivity of IKS would enable more holistic approaches to fisheries management and benefit global conservation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"669-687\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faf.12905\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12905\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12905","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土著人民发展了知识体系,促进了人类与其他非人类之间相互尊重和互惠的关系,支持了具有复原力的生态系统和社会。尽管受到殖民化的影响,土著知识系统(IKS)在世界许多地方仍然存在,并且越来越多的人认识到IKS可以有力地改善渔业管理。在过去五年中,负责管理加拿大渔业的联邦机构加拿大渔业和海洋部(DFO)发布了旨在使渔业管理更加包容IKS的政策和战略。为了衡量其实施进展,我们将13个半定量指标和IKS包容性的定性分析应用于DFO制作或共同制作的78份公共文件样本,以提供管理决策建议。在这些文献中,约87%报告的案例没有有意义地包括土著居民及其IKS, 9.0%报告的案例中土著居民被包括在研究的某些方面,但土著居民的IKS没有被包括在内,约3%报告的案例中土著居民对研究设计的目标和要素做出了贡献,但过程中西方科学优先于土著居民,只有一篇文献符合土著居民和西方科学配对的高标准。我们在加拿大情况下制定的指标,经过当地适当的修订,可以用来衡量其他国家的州政府在渔业管理中纳入IKS的程度,从而确定法律、政策和实践中的缺陷,并为缓解措施提供信息。加强IKS的包容性将使渔业管理采取更全面的方法,并有利于全球保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inclusivity of Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Fisheries Management

Inclusivity of Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Fisheries Management

Indigenous Peoples have developed knowledge systems that foster respectful and reciprocal relations between humans and other-than-human beings, supporting resilient ecosystems and societies. Despite the impacts of colonisation, Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) endure in many parts of the world, and there is growing recognition that IKS can strongly improve fisheries management. During the last 5 years, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), the federal institution responsible for managing Canada's fisheries, released policies and strategies intended to make fisheries management more inclusive of IKS. To measure progress in their implementation, we applied 13 semiquantitative indicators and qualitative analyses of IKS inclusivity to a sample of 78 public documents produced or co-produced by DFO to advise management decisions. Of these documents, ≈87% reported cases that did not meaningfully include Indigenous Peoples and their IKS, 9.0% reported cases in which Indigenous Peoples were included in some aspects of research but their IKS was not, ≈3% reported cases in which IKS contributed to objectives and elements of research design but the process privileged Western science over IKS, and only one document met a high standard for the pairing of IKS and Western science. The indicators that we developed in a Canadian context can be used, with locally appropriate revisions, to gauge the extent to which state governments in other countries are inclusive of IKS in fisheries management, thereby identifying shortcomings in law, policy, and practice and informing mitigation measures. Strengthening the inclusivity of IKS would enable more holistic approaches to fisheries management and benefit global conservation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fish and Fisheries
Fish and Fisheries 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信