{"title":"渔业管理中土著知识系统的包容性","authors":"Keshia Moffat, Jamie Snook, Kenneth Paul, Alejandro Frid","doi":"10.1111/faf.12905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Indigenous Peoples have developed knowledge systems that foster respectful and reciprocal relations between humans and other-than-human beings, supporting resilient ecosystems and societies. Despite the impacts of colonisation, Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) endure in many parts of the world, and there is growing recognition that IKS can strongly improve fisheries management. During the last 5 years, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), the federal institution responsible for managing Canada's fisheries, released policies and strategies intended to make fisheries management more inclusive of IKS. To measure progress in their implementation, we applied 13 semiquantitative indicators and qualitative analyses of IKS inclusivity to a sample of 78 public documents produced or co-produced by DFO to advise management decisions. Of these documents, ≈87% reported cases that did not meaningfully include Indigenous Peoples and their IKS, 9.0% reported cases in which Indigenous Peoples were included in some aspects of research but their IKS was not, ≈3% reported cases in which IKS contributed to objectives and elements of research design but the process privileged Western science over IKS, and only one document met a high standard for the pairing of IKS and Western science. The indicators that we developed in a Canadian context can be used, with locally appropriate revisions, to gauge the extent to which state governments in other countries are inclusive of IKS in fisheries management, thereby identifying shortcomings in law, policy, and practice and informing mitigation measures. Strengthening the inclusivity of IKS would enable more holistic approaches to fisheries management and benefit global conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"26 4","pages":"669-687"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faf.12905","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusivity of Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Fisheries Management\",\"authors\":\"Keshia Moffat, Jamie Snook, Kenneth Paul, Alejandro Frid\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/faf.12905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Indigenous Peoples have developed knowledge systems that foster respectful and reciprocal relations between humans and other-than-human beings, supporting resilient ecosystems and societies. Despite the impacts of colonisation, Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) endure in many parts of the world, and there is growing recognition that IKS can strongly improve fisheries management. During the last 5 years, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), the federal institution responsible for managing Canada's fisheries, released policies and strategies intended to make fisheries management more inclusive of IKS. To measure progress in their implementation, we applied 13 semiquantitative indicators and qualitative analyses of IKS inclusivity to a sample of 78 public documents produced or co-produced by DFO to advise management decisions. Of these documents, ≈87% reported cases that did not meaningfully include Indigenous Peoples and their IKS, 9.0% reported cases in which Indigenous Peoples were included in some aspects of research but their IKS was not, ≈3% reported cases in which IKS contributed to objectives and elements of research design but the process privileged Western science over IKS, and only one document met a high standard for the pairing of IKS and Western science. The indicators that we developed in a Canadian context can be used, with locally appropriate revisions, to gauge the extent to which state governments in other countries are inclusive of IKS in fisheries management, thereby identifying shortcomings in law, policy, and practice and informing mitigation measures. Strengthening the inclusivity of IKS would enable more holistic approaches to fisheries management and benefit global conservation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"669-687\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faf.12905\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12905\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12905","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inclusivity of Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Fisheries Management
Indigenous Peoples have developed knowledge systems that foster respectful and reciprocal relations between humans and other-than-human beings, supporting resilient ecosystems and societies. Despite the impacts of colonisation, Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) endure in many parts of the world, and there is growing recognition that IKS can strongly improve fisheries management. During the last 5 years, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), the federal institution responsible for managing Canada's fisheries, released policies and strategies intended to make fisheries management more inclusive of IKS. To measure progress in their implementation, we applied 13 semiquantitative indicators and qualitative analyses of IKS inclusivity to a sample of 78 public documents produced or co-produced by DFO to advise management decisions. Of these documents, ≈87% reported cases that did not meaningfully include Indigenous Peoples and their IKS, 9.0% reported cases in which Indigenous Peoples were included in some aspects of research but their IKS was not, ≈3% reported cases in which IKS contributed to objectives and elements of research design but the process privileged Western science over IKS, and only one document met a high standard for the pairing of IKS and Western science. The indicators that we developed in a Canadian context can be used, with locally appropriate revisions, to gauge the extent to which state governments in other countries are inclusive of IKS in fisheries management, thereby identifying shortcomings in law, policy, and practice and informing mitigation measures. Strengthening the inclusivity of IKS would enable more holistic approaches to fisheries management and benefit global conservation.
期刊介绍:
Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.