Shuang Ren, Xiao Fan, Zhijin Fang, Mingtan Zhu, Guo Liu, Jie Tang, Peng Wang
{"title":"产脲菌和硫酸盐还原菌协同处理酸性矿山废水和尿素废水:废物资源化利用策略","authors":"Shuang Ren, Xiao Fan, Zhijin Fang, Mingtan Zhu, Guo Liu, Jie Tang, Peng Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The acidic environment and lack of carbon sources in acid mine drainage (AMD) limit the effectiveness of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) in its treatment. The use of urease-producing bacteria (UPB) to hydrolyze urea and drive SRB to treat AMD addresses these two key limitations. Based on the pollution characteristics of AMD from an abandoned sulfur iron mine in Southwest China, this study investigates the feasibility of the combined UPB-SRB treatment for simulated AMD, explores the synergistic mechanism, and evaluates the practical application of this synergy in the treatment of real AMD. The UPB-SRB combination outperforms the individual use of UPB or SRB. When UPB neutralized the pH of simulated AMD from 2 to 5, the highest cost-effectiveness was observed: the solution’s pH increased to 7.2, with removal efficiencies for SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>, Fe, Fe<sup>2+</sup>, and Mn<sup>2+</sup> reaching 89.18%, 95.59%, 95.81%, and 88.2%, respectively. The reaction products of the UPB-SRB synergy included FeOOH, Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, FeS, Fe, and MnS. UPB utilized ammonia generated from urea hydrolysis to improve the acidic environment, while its metabolic by-products, including amino acids, organic acids, alcohols, and vitamin B, provided carbon and nitrogen sources for SRB. In the treatment of real AMD, the synergistic effect of UPB-SRB achieved removal efficiencies of 96.89% for SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>, 100% for Fe, and 99.89% for Mn<sup>2+</sup>, and raised the pH from 2 to 8. The treated AMD showed no bio-toxicity or potential risks and demonstrated agricultural reuse potential. By replacing traditional carbon/nitrogen sources with urea-containing wastewater, the combined use of UPB and SRB provides an efficient, safe, and cost-effective solution for AMD disposal, offering a novel approach to optimizing SRB-based AMD treatment and urea wastewater resource utilization.","PeriodicalId":361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergistic Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage and Urea Wastewater Based on Urease-producing Bacteria and Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria: A Strategy for Waste Resource Utilization\",\"authors\":\"Shuang Ren, Xiao Fan, Zhijin Fang, Mingtan Zhu, Guo Liu, Jie Tang, Peng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The acidic environment and lack of carbon sources in acid mine drainage (AMD) limit the effectiveness of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) in its treatment. The use of urease-producing bacteria (UPB) to hydrolyze urea and drive SRB to treat AMD addresses these two key limitations. Based on the pollution characteristics of AMD from an abandoned sulfur iron mine in Southwest China, this study investigates the feasibility of the combined UPB-SRB treatment for simulated AMD, explores the synergistic mechanism, and evaluates the practical application of this synergy in the treatment of real AMD. The UPB-SRB combination outperforms the individual use of UPB or SRB. When UPB neutralized the pH of simulated AMD from 2 to 5, the highest cost-effectiveness was observed: the solution’s pH increased to 7.2, with removal efficiencies for SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>, Fe, Fe<sup>2+</sup>, and Mn<sup>2+</sup> reaching 89.18%, 95.59%, 95.81%, and 88.2%, respectively. The reaction products of the UPB-SRB synergy included FeOOH, Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, FeS, Fe, and MnS. UPB utilized ammonia generated from urea hydrolysis to improve the acidic environment, while its metabolic by-products, including amino acids, organic acids, alcohols, and vitamin B, provided carbon and nitrogen sources for SRB. In the treatment of real AMD, the synergistic effect of UPB-SRB achieved removal efficiencies of 96.89% for SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>, 100% for Fe, and 99.89% for Mn<sup>2+</sup>, and raised the pH from 2 to 8. The treated AMD showed no bio-toxicity or potential risks and demonstrated agricultural reuse potential. By replacing traditional carbon/nitrogen sources with urea-containing wastewater, the combined use of UPB and SRB provides an efficient, safe, and cost-effective solution for AMD disposal, offering a novel approach to optimizing SRB-based AMD treatment and urea wastewater resource utilization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hazardous Materials\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hazardous Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138710\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138710","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Synergistic Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage and Urea Wastewater Based on Urease-producing Bacteria and Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria: A Strategy for Waste Resource Utilization
The acidic environment and lack of carbon sources in acid mine drainage (AMD) limit the effectiveness of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) in its treatment. The use of urease-producing bacteria (UPB) to hydrolyze urea and drive SRB to treat AMD addresses these two key limitations. Based on the pollution characteristics of AMD from an abandoned sulfur iron mine in Southwest China, this study investigates the feasibility of the combined UPB-SRB treatment for simulated AMD, explores the synergistic mechanism, and evaluates the practical application of this synergy in the treatment of real AMD. The UPB-SRB combination outperforms the individual use of UPB or SRB. When UPB neutralized the pH of simulated AMD from 2 to 5, the highest cost-effectiveness was observed: the solution’s pH increased to 7.2, with removal efficiencies for SO42-, Fe, Fe2+, and Mn2+ reaching 89.18%, 95.59%, 95.81%, and 88.2%, respectively. The reaction products of the UPB-SRB synergy included FeOOH, Fe2O3, FeS, Fe, and MnS. UPB utilized ammonia generated from urea hydrolysis to improve the acidic environment, while its metabolic by-products, including amino acids, organic acids, alcohols, and vitamin B, provided carbon and nitrogen sources for SRB. In the treatment of real AMD, the synergistic effect of UPB-SRB achieved removal efficiencies of 96.89% for SO42-, 100% for Fe, and 99.89% for Mn2+, and raised the pH from 2 to 8. The treated AMD showed no bio-toxicity or potential risks and demonstrated agricultural reuse potential. By replacing traditional carbon/nitrogen sources with urea-containing wastewater, the combined use of UPB and SRB provides an efficient, safe, and cost-effective solution for AMD disposal, offering a novel approach to optimizing SRB-based AMD treatment and urea wastewater resource utilization.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hazardous Materials serves as a global platform for promoting cutting-edge research in the field of Environmental Science and Engineering. Our publication features a wide range of articles, including full-length research papers, review articles, and perspectives, with the aim of enhancing our understanding of the dangers and risks associated with various materials concerning public health and the environment. It is important to note that the term "environmental contaminants" refers specifically to substances that pose hazardous effects through contamination, while excluding those that do not have such impacts on the environment or human health. Moreover, we emphasize the distinction between wastes and hazardous materials in order to provide further clarity on the scope of the journal. We have a keen interest in exploring specific compounds and microbial agents that have adverse effects on the environment.