在大鼠脊髓损伤模型中,机器人训练过程中施加的特定力优化运动恢复。

IF 3.7
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-26 DOI:10.1177/15459683251339809
Nathan D Neckel
{"title":"在大鼠脊髓损伤模型中,机器人训练过程中施加的特定力优化运动恢复。","authors":"Nathan D Neckel","doi":"10.1177/15459683251339809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>. Conventional physical therapy following neurological injury is an arduous task met with minimal returns and quickly plateauing recovery. Unconventional therapies, such as robotic assisted gait training (RAGT) have not produced the robust clinical gains that we all had hoped. Rodent RAGT is a nascent field, but it works on the same principles as the clinical counterpart. <i>Objective</i>. We have previously investigated the ability of RAGT to enhance the recovery of rats following a cervical spinal cord injury and found that training in a resistive field is detrimental, and training in a negative viscosity field is better than actively guiding the limbs through a healthy stepping pattern. Unfortunately, none of these treatments are particularly good at restoring unassisted overground locomotion. Previously we grouped animals based on the RAGT treatment they received. Upon further reflection, these groups are not based on what the animals actually experienced, but how the robot was programmed. <i>Methods</i>. In the work presented here we regrouped and reanalyzed our existing data bi-directionally (does level of overground recovery predict RAGT force profile experienced? does force profile predict recovery?). <i>Results</i>. This method allowed us to uncover a training force profile that optimized overground recovery, specifically, low overall forces (<±6 N), positive <i>Fy</i> and negative <i>Fx</i> during swing, and minimal forces during stance (<±2 N). <i>Conclusions</i>. This work provides new insights into the importance of the specific forces used in rehabilitation, a major shift in current clinical RAGT techniques, and could lead to improvements in patients' lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"602-611"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12324964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Specific Forces Applied During Robotic Training That Optimize Recovery of Locomotion in a Rat Model of Spinal Cord Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan D Neckel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683251339809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background</i>. Conventional physical therapy following neurological injury is an arduous task met with minimal returns and quickly plateauing recovery. Unconventional therapies, such as robotic assisted gait training (RAGT) have not produced the robust clinical gains that we all had hoped. Rodent RAGT is a nascent field, but it works on the same principles as the clinical counterpart. <i>Objective</i>. We have previously investigated the ability of RAGT to enhance the recovery of rats following a cervical spinal cord injury and found that training in a resistive field is detrimental, and training in a negative viscosity field is better than actively guiding the limbs through a healthy stepping pattern. Unfortunately, none of these treatments are particularly good at restoring unassisted overground locomotion. Previously we grouped animals based on the RAGT treatment they received. Upon further reflection, these groups are not based on what the animals actually experienced, but how the robot was programmed. <i>Methods</i>. In the work presented here we regrouped and reanalyzed our existing data bi-directionally (does level of overground recovery predict RAGT force profile experienced? does force profile predict recovery?). <i>Results</i>. This method allowed us to uncover a training force profile that optimized overground recovery, specifically, low overall forces (<±6 N), positive <i>Fy</i> and negative <i>Fx</i> during swing, and minimal forces during stance (<±2 N). <i>Conclusions</i>. This work provides new insights into the importance of the specific forces used in rehabilitation, a major shift in current clinical RAGT techniques, and could lead to improvements in patients' lives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"602-611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12324964/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251339809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251339809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。神经损伤后的常规物理治疗是一项艰巨的任务,其回报极低且恢复迅速趋于稳定。非传统疗法,如机器人辅助步态训练(RAGT)并没有产生我们所希望的强劲的临床效果。啮齿动物RAGT是一个新兴领域,但它的工作原理与临床对应物相同。目标。我们之前已经研究了RAGT促进颈脊髓损伤大鼠恢复的能力,发现在阻力场中训练是有害的,而在负粘度场中训练比积极引导肢体通过健康的步进模式要好。不幸的是,这些治疗方法都不能很好地恢复无辅助的地上运动。以前,我们根据动物接受的RAGT治疗对它们进行分组。经过进一步的思考,这些分类不是基于动物的实际经历,而是基于机器人的编程方式。方法。在本文介绍的工作中,我们对现有数据进行了双向重组和重新分析(地上采收水平是否可以预测所经历的RAGT力剖面?)力的分布能预测恢复吗?结果。这种方法使我们发现了一种训练力剖面,可以优化地上恢复,特别是低整体力(摆动时的Fy和负Fx)和最小的站立力(结论)。这项工作为康复中使用的特定力量的重要性提供了新的见解,这是当前临床RAGT技术的重大转变,并可能改善患者的生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Specific Forces Applied During Robotic Training That Optimize Recovery of Locomotion in a Rat Model of Spinal Cord Injury.

Background. Conventional physical therapy following neurological injury is an arduous task met with minimal returns and quickly plateauing recovery. Unconventional therapies, such as robotic assisted gait training (RAGT) have not produced the robust clinical gains that we all had hoped. Rodent RAGT is a nascent field, but it works on the same principles as the clinical counterpart. Objective. We have previously investigated the ability of RAGT to enhance the recovery of rats following a cervical spinal cord injury and found that training in a resistive field is detrimental, and training in a negative viscosity field is better than actively guiding the limbs through a healthy stepping pattern. Unfortunately, none of these treatments are particularly good at restoring unassisted overground locomotion. Previously we grouped animals based on the RAGT treatment they received. Upon further reflection, these groups are not based on what the animals actually experienced, but how the robot was programmed. Methods. In the work presented here we regrouped and reanalyzed our existing data bi-directionally (does level of overground recovery predict RAGT force profile experienced? does force profile predict recovery?). Results. This method allowed us to uncover a training force profile that optimized overground recovery, specifically, low overall forces (<±6 N), positive Fy and negative Fx during swing, and minimal forces during stance (<±2 N). Conclusions. This work provides new insights into the importance of the specific forces used in rehabilitation, a major shift in current clinical RAGT techniques, and could lead to improvements in patients' lives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信