EXPRESS:超越年龄和家族史:症状作为结直肠癌筛查的预测因素。

IF 2
Majd Khader, Rimon Artoul, Jorge-Shmuel Delgado, Moshe Ben Artzi, Abu-Freha Naim
{"title":"EXPRESS:超越年龄和家族史:症状作为结直肠癌筛查的预测因素。","authors":"Majd Khader, Rimon Artoul, Jorge-Shmuel Delgado, Moshe Ben Artzi, Abu-Freha Naim","doi":"10.1177/10815589251346964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines have prioritized age and clinically relevant family history, yet other clinically relevant parameters remain underutilized. Our study investigates the correlation between CRC-related manifestations and screening performance metrics-polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). This cross-sectional retrospective study analyzed 235,781 colonoscopy procedures from eight medical centers in Israel conducted between 2016 and 2022. The dataset comprised the identification and classification of polyps, adenomas, and CRC, in conjunction with patient demographics, clinical background, and particular clinical-laboratory manifestations, including hematochezia, abdominal pain, family history of CRC, fecal occult blood results, and presence of anemia. Our study found significant variations in PDR and ADR based on symptom presence. Patients with hematochezia exhibited a PDR of 36.8% and an ADR of 12.1%, compared to 28.7% and 10.8% in those without it. Furthermore, individuals with occult blood in their feces had a PDR of 48.3% and an ADR of 21.5%, respectively, while those without had rates of 31.6% and 11.0%. In addition, having a family history of CRC is also related to a more significant increase in PDR and ADR of 37.7% and 13.8% compared to patients with no family history of CRC, who had PDR and ADR of 33.3% and 12.2%. Moreover, clinical combinations, including CRC family history with hematochezia or occult blood, had the highest PDR of 62.3% and 58.9%, and ADR of 15% and 20.6%, respectively. Incorporating hematochezia and fecal blood occult tests enhances the effectiveness of the CRC screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":520677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research","volume":" ","pages":"573-579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond age and family history: Symptoms as predictors in colorectal cancer screening.\",\"authors\":\"Majd Khader, Rimon Artoul, Jorge-Shmuel Delgado, Moshe Ben Artzi, Abu-Freha Naim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10815589251346964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines have prioritized age and clinically relevant family history, yet other clinically relevant parameters remain underutilized. Our study investigates the correlation between CRC-related manifestations and screening performance metrics-polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). This cross-sectional retrospective study analyzed 235,781 colonoscopy procedures from eight medical centers in Israel conducted between 2016 and 2022. The dataset comprised the identification and classification of polyps, adenomas, and CRC, in conjunction with patient demographics, clinical background, and particular clinical-laboratory manifestations, including hematochezia, abdominal pain, family history of CRC, fecal occult blood results, and presence of anemia. Our study found significant variations in PDR and ADR based on symptom presence. Patients with hematochezia exhibited a PDR of 36.8% and an ADR of 12.1%, compared to 28.7% and 10.8% in those without it. Furthermore, individuals with occult blood in their feces had a PDR of 48.3% and an ADR of 21.5%, respectively, while those without had rates of 31.6% and 11.0%. In addition, having a family history of CRC is also related to a more significant increase in PDR and ADR of 37.7% and 13.8% compared to patients with no family history of CRC, who had PDR and ADR of 33.3% and 12.2%. Moreover, clinical combinations, including CRC family history with hematochezia or occult blood, had the highest PDR of 62.3% and 58.9%, and ADR of 15% and 20.6%, respectively. Incorporating hematochezia and fecal blood occult tests enhances the effectiveness of the CRC screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"573-579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589251346964\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589251346964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结直肠癌(CRC)筛查指南优先考虑年龄和临床相关家族史,但其他临床相关参数仍未得到充分利用。我们的研究探讨了crc相关表现与筛查绩效指标——息肉检出率(PDR)和腺瘤检出率(ADR)之间的关系。这项横断面回顾性研究分析了2016-2022年间以色列8个医疗中心进行的235781例结肠镜检查。该数据集包括息肉、腺瘤和CRC的识别和分类,并结合患者人口统计学、临床背景和特定的临床-实验室表现,包括便血、腹痛、CRC家族史、粪便隐血结果和贫血的存在。我们的研究发现基于症状存在的PDR和ADR存在显著差异。有便血的患者PDR为36.8%,ADR为12.1%,而无便血的患者PDR为28.7%,ADR为10.8%。粪便中有隐血的个体PDR为48.3%,ADR为21.5%,而粪便中没有隐血的个体PDR为31.6%,ADR为11.0%。此外,与无CRC家族史的患者相比,有CRC家族史的患者PDR和ADR分别增加了37.7%和13.8%,无CRC家族史的患者PDR和ADR分别增加了33.3%和12.2%。此外,包括结直肠癌家族史合并便血或隐血的临床组合,PDR最高,分别为62.3%和58.9%,ADR最高,分别为15%和20.6%。合并便血和粪血隐蔽性检查可提高CRC筛查的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond age and family history: Symptoms as predictors in colorectal cancer screening.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines have prioritized age and clinically relevant family history, yet other clinically relevant parameters remain underutilized. Our study investigates the correlation between CRC-related manifestations and screening performance metrics-polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). This cross-sectional retrospective study analyzed 235,781 colonoscopy procedures from eight medical centers in Israel conducted between 2016 and 2022. The dataset comprised the identification and classification of polyps, adenomas, and CRC, in conjunction with patient demographics, clinical background, and particular clinical-laboratory manifestations, including hematochezia, abdominal pain, family history of CRC, fecal occult blood results, and presence of anemia. Our study found significant variations in PDR and ADR based on symptom presence. Patients with hematochezia exhibited a PDR of 36.8% and an ADR of 12.1%, compared to 28.7% and 10.8% in those without it. Furthermore, individuals with occult blood in their feces had a PDR of 48.3% and an ADR of 21.5%, respectively, while those without had rates of 31.6% and 11.0%. In addition, having a family history of CRC is also related to a more significant increase in PDR and ADR of 37.7% and 13.8% compared to patients with no family history of CRC, who had PDR and ADR of 33.3% and 12.2%. Moreover, clinical combinations, including CRC family history with hematochezia or occult blood, had the highest PDR of 62.3% and 58.9%, and ADR of 15% and 20.6%, respectively. Incorporating hematochezia and fecal blood occult tests enhances the effectiveness of the CRC screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信