{"title":"分数CO2激光与聚焦超声治疗外阴硬化地衣的回顾性比较。","authors":"Maoyu Liu, Xuerui Zhang, Linlin Xiao, Jing Liang, Dan Cheng, Yue Zhu, Shufang Chang","doi":"10.1080/02656736.2025.2507958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy of fractional carbon dioxide laser (FxCO<sub>2</sub>) and focused ultrasound (FUS) in treating vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included biopsy-proven VLS patients who did not respond to first-line topical corticosteroids and were treated with FxCO<sub>2</sub> or FUS as an alternative between January 2020 and October 2022. The efficacy was evaluated using the Cattaneo score and clinical scoring system (CSS). A subgroup analysis was conducted to compare efficacy based on VLS severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 3-month follow-up, the total effective rates were similar between FxCO<sub>2</sub> (91.18%, 31/34) and FUS (88.57%, 31/35) (<i>p</i> > 0.05). At the 6-month follow-up, the total effective rates for FxCO<sub>2</sub> decreased to 85.29% (29/34), while FUS remained at 88.57% (31/35) (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Recurrence rates were 14.7% (5/34) for FxCO<sub>2</sub> and 11.4% (4/35) for FUS (<i>p</i> > 0.05) at the 6-month follow-up. Although there was no significant difference in total CSS scores and clinician-administered sign scores between FxCO<sub>2</sub> and FUS at both follow-ups (<i>p</i> > 0.05), FxCO<sub>2</sub> suggested superior patient-administered symptom improvement at 3-month (median: FxCO<sub>2</sub> 3 vs. FUS 5, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and 6-month follow-ups (median: FxCO<sub>2</sub> 3 vs. FUS 5, <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FxCO<sub>2</sub> and FUS show similar efficacy in treating VLS, with FxCO<sub>2</sub> suggesting a trend toward greater symptom relief. Further studies are needed to validate these preliminary observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520653,"journal":{"name":"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group","volume":"42 1","pages":"2507958"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comparison of fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser and focused ultrasound for vulvar lichen sclerosus: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Maoyu Liu, Xuerui Zhang, Linlin Xiao, Jing Liang, Dan Cheng, Yue Zhu, Shufang Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02656736.2025.2507958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy of fractional carbon dioxide laser (FxCO<sub>2</sub>) and focused ultrasound (FUS) in treating vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included biopsy-proven VLS patients who did not respond to first-line topical corticosteroids and were treated with FxCO<sub>2</sub> or FUS as an alternative between January 2020 and October 2022. The efficacy was evaluated using the Cattaneo score and clinical scoring system (CSS). A subgroup analysis was conducted to compare efficacy based on VLS severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 3-month follow-up, the total effective rates were similar between FxCO<sub>2</sub> (91.18%, 31/34) and FUS (88.57%, 31/35) (<i>p</i> > 0.05). At the 6-month follow-up, the total effective rates for FxCO<sub>2</sub> decreased to 85.29% (29/34), while FUS remained at 88.57% (31/35) (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Recurrence rates were 14.7% (5/34) for FxCO<sub>2</sub> and 11.4% (4/35) for FUS (<i>p</i> > 0.05) at the 6-month follow-up. Although there was no significant difference in total CSS scores and clinician-administered sign scores between FxCO<sub>2</sub> and FUS at both follow-ups (<i>p</i> > 0.05), FxCO<sub>2</sub> suggested superior patient-administered symptom improvement at 3-month (median: FxCO<sub>2</sub> 3 vs. FUS 5, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and 6-month follow-ups (median: FxCO<sub>2</sub> 3 vs. FUS 5, <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FxCO<sub>2</sub> and FUS show similar efficacy in treating VLS, with FxCO<sub>2</sub> suggesting a trend toward greater symptom relief. Further studies are needed to validate these preliminary observations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"2507958\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2025.2507958\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2025.2507958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较分数二氧化碳激光(FxCO2)与聚焦超声(FUS)治疗外阴硬化性地衣(VLS)的疗效。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了活检证实的VLS患者,这些患者对一线局部皮质类固醇没有反应,并在2020年1月至2022年10月期间接受FxCO2或FUS作为替代治疗。采用Cattaneo评分和临床评分系统(CSS)评价疗效。进行亚组分析,比较基于VLS严重程度的疗效。结果:随访3个月,FxCO2总有效率为91.18% (31/34),FUS总有效率为88.57%(31/35),差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。随访6个月,FxCO2总有效率为85.29% (29/34),FUS总有效率为88.57% (31/35)(p < 0.05)。随访6个月,FxCO2复发率为14.7% (5/34),FUS复发率为11.4% (4/35)(p < 0.05)。虽然FxCO2和FUS在两次随访时的CSS总分和临床给药体征评分没有显著差异(p < 0.05),但FxCO2在3个月时显示患者给药症状改善的优势(中位数:FxCO2 3 vs. FUS 5, p < 2.3 vs. FUS 5, p)。结论:FxCO2和FUS治疗VLS的疗效相似,FxCO2显示更大的症状缓解趋势。需要进一步的研究来验证这些初步观察结果。
The comparison of fractional CO2 laser and focused ultrasound for vulvar lichen sclerosus: a retrospective study.
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of fractional carbon dioxide laser (FxCO2) and focused ultrasound (FUS) in treating vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS).
Methods: This single-center retrospective study included biopsy-proven VLS patients who did not respond to first-line topical corticosteroids and were treated with FxCO2 or FUS as an alternative between January 2020 and October 2022. The efficacy was evaluated using the Cattaneo score and clinical scoring system (CSS). A subgroup analysis was conducted to compare efficacy based on VLS severity.
Results: At the 3-month follow-up, the total effective rates were similar between FxCO2 (91.18%, 31/34) and FUS (88.57%, 31/35) (p > 0.05). At the 6-month follow-up, the total effective rates for FxCO2 decreased to 85.29% (29/34), while FUS remained at 88.57% (31/35) (p > 0.05). Recurrence rates were 14.7% (5/34) for FxCO2 and 11.4% (4/35) for FUS (p > 0.05) at the 6-month follow-up. Although there was no significant difference in total CSS scores and clinician-administered sign scores between FxCO2 and FUS at both follow-ups (p > 0.05), FxCO2 suggested superior patient-administered symptom improvement at 3-month (median: FxCO2 3 vs. FUS 5, p < 0.05) and 6-month follow-ups (median: FxCO2 3 vs. FUS 5, p < 0.01).
Conclusions: FxCO2 and FUS show similar efficacy in treating VLS, with FxCO2 suggesting a trend toward greater symptom relief. Further studies are needed to validate these preliminary observations.