Ana Pascual-Sanchez, Nidhita Singh, Clara Lee, Paulina Smoter, Amabel Dessain, Toby Zundel, Emma Baker, Dennis Ougrin
{"title":"危机服务青少年强化社区治疗服务的服务评估和治疗途径:我们能学到什么?","authors":"Ana Pascual-Sanchez, Nidhita Singh, Clara Lee, Paulina Smoter, Amabel Dessain, Toby Zundel, Emma Baker, Dennis Ougrin","doi":"10.1177/13591045251343115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Intensive community treatment services are emerging as an alternative to admission and/or to support discharge from hospital. This service evaluation aims to assess treatment pathways and factors associated with treatment duration and general functioning. <b>Methods:</b> A service evaluation using routinely collected data from an intensive community treatment service between 2016 and 2023 was performed. <b>Results:</b> 141 adolescents aged 12 to 17 received intensive community treatment over 8 years. The average treatment duration was 29.2 weeks, significantly longer than the initial 12-week pathway proposed. Those treated for significantly longer seemed to present with more complex mental health needs. Lack of education provision, being part of an ethnic minority or having a higher number of services involved were significantly associated with higher treatment duration (<i>p</i> < .05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Results suggest that a longer treatment pathway might be necessary in intensive community care, so a 24-week treatment pathway was proposed. General functioning also improved over the course of treatment, and 89.4% were discharged back to their local community teams. The involvement of multiple specialist services and the presence of specific diagnoses (e.g., autism) deserve consideration. Future evaluations will clarify if more targeted treatment pathways are more effective and efficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":93938,"journal":{"name":"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"13591045251343115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Service evaluation and treatment pathways in an intensive community treatment service for adolescents in crisis services: What can we learn?\",\"authors\":\"Ana Pascual-Sanchez, Nidhita Singh, Clara Lee, Paulina Smoter, Amabel Dessain, Toby Zundel, Emma Baker, Dennis Ougrin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13591045251343115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Intensive community treatment services are emerging as an alternative to admission and/or to support discharge from hospital. This service evaluation aims to assess treatment pathways and factors associated with treatment duration and general functioning. <b>Methods:</b> A service evaluation using routinely collected data from an intensive community treatment service between 2016 and 2023 was performed. <b>Results:</b> 141 adolescents aged 12 to 17 received intensive community treatment over 8 years. The average treatment duration was 29.2 weeks, significantly longer than the initial 12-week pathway proposed. Those treated for significantly longer seemed to present with more complex mental health needs. Lack of education provision, being part of an ethnic minority or having a higher number of services involved were significantly associated with higher treatment duration (<i>p</i> < .05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Results suggest that a longer treatment pathway might be necessary in intensive community care, so a 24-week treatment pathway was proposed. General functioning also improved over the course of treatment, and 89.4% were discharged back to their local community teams. The involvement of multiple specialist services and the presence of specific diagnoses (e.g., autism) deserve consideration. Future evaluations will clarify if more targeted treatment pathways are more effective and efficient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13591045251343115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045251343115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045251343115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Service evaluation and treatment pathways in an intensive community treatment service for adolescents in crisis services: What can we learn?
Background: Intensive community treatment services are emerging as an alternative to admission and/or to support discharge from hospital. This service evaluation aims to assess treatment pathways and factors associated with treatment duration and general functioning. Methods: A service evaluation using routinely collected data from an intensive community treatment service between 2016 and 2023 was performed. Results: 141 adolescents aged 12 to 17 received intensive community treatment over 8 years. The average treatment duration was 29.2 weeks, significantly longer than the initial 12-week pathway proposed. Those treated for significantly longer seemed to present with more complex mental health needs. Lack of education provision, being part of an ethnic minority or having a higher number of services involved were significantly associated with higher treatment duration (p < .05). Conclusion: Results suggest that a longer treatment pathway might be necessary in intensive community care, so a 24-week treatment pathway was proposed. General functioning also improved over the course of treatment, and 89.4% were discharged back to their local community teams. The involvement of multiple specialist services and the presence of specific diagnoses (e.g., autism) deserve consideration. Future evaluations will clarify if more targeted treatment pathways are more effective and efficient.