Z Megdiche, M Lamloumi, B Maamar, S Dhraief, A A Messadi, L Thabet
{"title":"[头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和头孢托ozane-他唑巴坦对临床分离的肠杆菌科和假单胞菌的体外活性:来自突尼斯创伤中心和烧伤病房的结果]。","authors":"Z Megdiche, M Lamloumi, B Maamar, S Dhraief, A A Messadi, L Thabet","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibiotic resistance is an escalating public health challenge, particularly among Enterobacteriaceae and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>. In this study conducted at a burn center in Tunisia, we collected 307 non-redundant strains of Enterobacteriaceae from predominantly hospitalized patients, with a majority in the burn intensive care unit (59%), the primary identified species being <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (34.8%). We evaluated the efficacy of two antibiotics, ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (CT). The results revealed that the overall resistance to CZA was 11.7%, while to CT it was 25.7%. CZA proved to be the second most sensitive molecule among all tested antibiotics, following fosfomycin. Among strains resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, 73.3% were sensitive to CZA, and 41.5% to CT. Out of seventy-nine CT-resistant strains, eight were ESBL producers, twenty-two were high-level cephalosporinases, thirty-three carried <i>blaNDM</i>, twelve carried <i>blaOXA48</i>, and four carried both <i>blaNDM</i> and <i>blaOXA-48</i>. Indeed, <i>blaNDM</i> were the most prevalent carbapenemases. For <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> strains (n=161), resistance to CZA was 42.2%, and to CT it was 47.8%. These antibiotics ranked as the second and third most active beta-lactams after aztreonam. Among the 71 strains of CZA and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, 54.1% produced VIM2. Resistance to enterobacteriaceae against CZA and CT is relatively high in our study. However, CZA remains a salvage therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms, and its use should be considered only after documentation and in the absence of other alternatives among β-lactams. For <i>P. aeruginosa</i>, CZA currently represents the most active β-lactam against CAZ-R strains and the second most active molecule overall, including those producing carbapenemases.</p>","PeriodicalId":93873,"journal":{"name":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","volume":"38 1","pages":"31-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[In vitro activity of ceftazidime- avibactam and ceftolozane- tazobactam against clinical isolates of enterobacteriaceae and <i>pseudomonas æruginosa</i>: results from a trauma center and burn unit in tunisia].\",\"authors\":\"Z Megdiche, M Lamloumi, B Maamar, S Dhraief, A A Messadi, L Thabet\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antibiotic resistance is an escalating public health challenge, particularly among Enterobacteriaceae and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>. In this study conducted at a burn center in Tunisia, we collected 307 non-redundant strains of Enterobacteriaceae from predominantly hospitalized patients, with a majority in the burn intensive care unit (59%), the primary identified species being <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (34.8%). We evaluated the efficacy of two antibiotics, ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (CT). The results revealed that the overall resistance to CZA was 11.7%, while to CT it was 25.7%. CZA proved to be the second most sensitive molecule among all tested antibiotics, following fosfomycin. Among strains resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, 73.3% were sensitive to CZA, and 41.5% to CT. Out of seventy-nine CT-resistant strains, eight were ESBL producers, twenty-two were high-level cephalosporinases, thirty-three carried <i>blaNDM</i>, twelve carried <i>blaOXA48</i>, and four carried both <i>blaNDM</i> and <i>blaOXA-48</i>. Indeed, <i>blaNDM</i> were the most prevalent carbapenemases. For <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> strains (n=161), resistance to CZA was 42.2%, and to CT it was 47.8%. These antibiotics ranked as the second and third most active beta-lactams after aztreonam. Among the 71 strains of CZA and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, 54.1% produced VIM2. Resistance to enterobacteriaceae against CZA and CT is relatively high in our study. However, CZA remains a salvage therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms, and its use should be considered only after documentation and in the absence of other alternatives among β-lactams. For <i>P. aeruginosa</i>, CZA currently represents the most active β-lactam against CAZ-R strains and the second most active molecule overall, including those producing carbapenemases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of burns and fire disasters\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"31-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096279/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of burns and fire disasters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[In vitro activity of ceftazidime- avibactam and ceftolozane- tazobactam against clinical isolates of enterobacteriaceae and pseudomonas æruginosa: results from a trauma center and burn unit in tunisia].
Antibiotic resistance is an escalating public health challenge, particularly among Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this study conducted at a burn center in Tunisia, we collected 307 non-redundant strains of Enterobacteriaceae from predominantly hospitalized patients, with a majority in the burn intensive care unit (59%), the primary identified species being Klebsiella pneumoniae (34.8%). We evaluated the efficacy of two antibiotics, ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (CT). The results revealed that the overall resistance to CZA was 11.7%, while to CT it was 25.7%. CZA proved to be the second most sensitive molecule among all tested antibiotics, following fosfomycin. Among strains resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, 73.3% were sensitive to CZA, and 41.5% to CT. Out of seventy-nine CT-resistant strains, eight were ESBL producers, twenty-two were high-level cephalosporinases, thirty-three carried blaNDM, twelve carried blaOXA48, and four carried both blaNDM and blaOXA-48. Indeed, blaNDM were the most prevalent carbapenemases. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains (n=161), resistance to CZA was 42.2%, and to CT it was 47.8%. These antibiotics ranked as the second and third most active beta-lactams after aztreonam. Among the 71 strains of CZA and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, 54.1% produced VIM2. Resistance to enterobacteriaceae against CZA and CT is relatively high in our study. However, CZA remains a salvage therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms, and its use should be considered only after documentation and in the absence of other alternatives among β-lactams. For P. aeruginosa, CZA currently represents the most active β-lactam against CAZ-R strains and the second most active molecule overall, including those producing carbapenemases.